Giuliani: Uniformed Police Officers Not Allowed on Democratic Convention Floor

by Jeff Poor,
July 28, 2016

Thursday on Fox News Channel’s “Fox & Friends,” in an appearance from the site of the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani called the convention “the most anti-police” and “the most anti-law enforcement” he had ever seen.

However, he also said that according to “high-ranking police officers” in Philadelphia, uniformed law enforcement was not allowed on the floor of the convention.

224 Comments - what are your thoughts?

  • JB Wright says:

    Does hitlery think she can keep uniformed police officers out of the Democratic conventions? I don’t recall any political party having the power to decide what police could or couldn’t do whilst policing an event in their jurisdiction. I guess the bitch is just used to having the FBI as well as several other government agencies on the payroll. The police need to tell democrats to shut the fuck up!

  • Laurajferguson3 says:

    <<o. ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::::!!br833p:….,…

  • Phil Esposito says:

    I don’t see a problem with the police not being on the floor. When trouble breaks out, the dems can call a crack head for help. This way the cops don’t get hurt.

  • robert sanders says:

    What hole did they dig TIM KAOTIC out of.

    1. jnora says:

      He is really a zero, isn’t he?

      1. I Seigel says:

        Which puts him a half point above Pence. Am I right?!?

        1. jnora says:

          I like Pence a lot. It just means you are a sourpuss!!!!

          1. I Seigel says:

            That could be. I’ve been called worse here. Perhaps by you?

          1. I Seigel says:

            This is the same group that Harris County Texas indicted for those scammed videos of Planned Parenthood. By the way, the case was thrown out on a technicality, not because they were found innocent of fraud.

  • champion2211 says:

    I think they should have just gone out and did their regular jobs. No police at the convention. NONE. They want to play hard ball then let them do the police work also. No rope around the arena either. Let the protesters in.

  • Tammy Dorsey Berthaut says:

    I don’t understand why they all didn’t leave. They think police are so horrible why be here? Let them deal with whatever happens.

  • cutterguy says:

    we can maybe dream of terrorists raiding them? Oh wait they are the terrorists.

    1. robert sanders says:


    2. jnora says:

      Hillary thinks Republicans are the terrorists!

  • Original Anna says:

    The police aren’t needed because it is the democrats through Soroh, whatever his name is who is paying for the activists or better called rioting democrat lovers to show up only at one place, wherever Trump is. Trump doesn’t pay for rioters to show up at Hillary’s stuff. He doesn’t have to in order to win. He lets his enemies talk all they want. The more they talk the more people realize just what they are, a bunch of liers to get voted, socialists, communists, secularists, humanists, anything but Americans, that is for sure.

  • Born in the South and proud says:

    Since the demos don’t believe anything except the police are evil, and they don’t need them for anything. I think it would be a great idea for all the police officers to go on vacation or to the doctor. All I have seen on TV at the demo convention don’t look healthy to me. Looks like the have some type of virus and likely very contagious. So for the safety of the convention goers they should either report to the hospital or stay at least 10 miles away from convention site.
    Trump 2016 God Bless America Let FREEDOM Ring…. Kill-r-hillr for life in jail for crimes against the American people.

  • Tony says:

    Dumb Dem-o-Rats & libtards!
    Most mass shootings are carried out by Dem-o-Rats!
    Over 5 million NRA Members killed no one yesterday!

  • Not a stupid donkey says:

    It shows the world how sick these democrat’s are they are the ones that are preaching hate cops. Cops are banned from being on the floor of the convention by Hillary and her followers She had the unfit mothers who raised their children to be crooks and murder. And their children all had rap sheets a mile long and Clinton made them out to be little angles and but blame on the cop being the bad ones. Did you hear her say one kind word to the officers family or have them speak at the convention no you didn’t. And if you check you will find out that ever mass murder in this country was by a registered Democrat!

  • exceeds performance says:

    And you won’t see a US Flag on the convention floor either

  • GrizzMann says:

    Uniforms do scare Democrats and their constituency.

  • Tony says:

    I’m surprised that the PO’s didn’t get the “Blue Flu”.

    And to the he/she whose dress caught on fire while burning the American Flag: Are you “Feeling the Burn”???….LOL

  • justinwachin says:

    I guess it’s hard to have some of the victims feel comfortable when uniformed police officers are near. The absence of uniformed officers in the crowd shots sends a message to the voters.

    1. Larry says:

      Most of the dimocrats need to run from the law because of all the warrants out against them..Looked like a NAACP meeting any way

    2. jnora says:

      They should take away all the Dems Secret Service protection. Think they would change their tune then? Let the thugs get them. If they think they don’t want or need the police, then let them not have them.

      1. justinwachin says:

        You make a good point, jnora. Barack Obama and the Clintons have no problem with illegal immigrants or coming up with policies that endanger police officers, because they will have Secret Service protection for the rest of their lives.

        If we want to see real change in Washington our elected officials should have to live by the same laws and conditions that they consider to be “good enough” for the citizens.

        1. jnora says:

          I say let them hire their own protection! That’s pretty funny to think about, isn’t it? One of our congress members (Diane Black) carries because she was mugged one time. She is running for re-election one time and she tells the story in her election ads now. I love it.

        2. jnora says:

          And so will their family!

  • bobnstuff says:

    I love reading all the silly statements. Maybe the Democrats do fear each other enough to need uniformed armed guards. Did you notice that the Republicans didn’t let guns into their convention, they must have been living in fear the who time since they believe more guns make you safe.

    1. Larry says:

      Did you see all the rifles and handguns at the RNC, I bet you did not see any at the DNC anywhere in or outside.

      1. jnora says:

        The Republicans need them more…more threats from the Dems.

        1. robert sanders says:

          It does not do any good to try to convince stupid people about guns , until they really wish they had one when someone is robbing them are raping them. All they can do is cry for mama to help them but its too late.

          1. jnora says:

            The stats prove our point. Sometimes when I think they can’t be that stupid, they prove me wrong yet again.

          2. robert sanders says:

            My neighbor was stupid, until he had a home invasion. His wife got off lucky. Just tied her up instead of raping or killing her. They are now a proud owner of a 45 cal. auto and a 12 guage shotgun. Bring it on gangbangers and robbers.

          3. jnora says:

            Shotguns are VERY effective. Hurts ’em all over the place. Hard to miss…LOL.

      2. Papa Bear says:

        Maybe you didn’t see them you can bet your sweet ass that there were plenty there, probably mostly illegal ones too.

    2. Papa Bear says:

      There were plenty of guns at the RNC because Ohio is an open carry state and Kasich refused to suspend that law during the convention. However, the only people carrying guns inside the convention were uniformed police doing their job and the Secret Service doing their job.

      1. bobnstuff says:

        Pa. is an open carry state also but the people in Pennsylvania don’t feel the need to carry guns as much as the people in Ohio plus the Democrats don’t live in fear like the Republicans do.

        1. Papa Bear says:

          Then you just tell all of the thugs to be good boys and turn in their guns because they really have no need for them … see how far that gets you.

          1. jnora says:

            Try the same with the bikers!

          2. Papa Bear says:

            That would really be a hoot lol

          3. bobnstuff says:

            Maybe we should keep the guns away from those thugs in the first place. All those illegal gun owners got guns that were sold by someone and most likely sold legally. Ever wonder were those guns came from in the first place?

          4. Papa Bear says:

            Outlaws and thugs will always find ways to acquire weapons either by hook or crook so you can pass all the gun control laws you want but you will never stop them. The only people who would be affected are law abiding citizens and the powers that be know that.

          5. bobnstuff says:

            Do we have to make it so easy for them. How many of those guns come from law abiding citizens?


          6. Papa Bear says:

            You mean are “stolen” from law abiding citizens

          7. bobnstuff says:

            People don’t take care to be sure their guns are safe and they get stolen. When was the last time you heard of someone loosing a gun from a gun safe. You don’t leave money just lying around but to many people think leaving a gun on the night stand is OK. Also people sell guns as private owners without care of who is buying them. I can get almost any gun I want without a back ground check and the guy selling them doesn’t know anything about me except that I’m a friend of a friend. It’s those law abiding citizens that are supplying the guns to thugs. I own guns but they will never end up in the hands of anyone that I don’t choose and trust. If you can’t keep your guns safe you shouldn’t have them.

          8. I Seigel says:

            I’ve tried posting links to articles in the Chicago Tribune, too. Articles that go thru the very recent history of gun laws in Chicago, and recalling that Chicago passed very strict gun laws THAT HAVE BEEN OVERTURNED THROUGH THE EFFORTS OF THE NRA AND OTHERS. Chicago NO LONGER HAS THESE LAWS ON THE BOOKS, and as a result, more gun crimes are being committed. But these righties here still think that Chicago still has the strictest gun laws in the country. And proof like I’ve posted from the Tribune is just batted away as lies from the MSM. I’ve been told that the FBI website has “the real truth”, but so far no one has been able or willing to post anything to the contrary.

        2. jnora says:

          That falls into the DUH category…it is because it is the Democrats that are the ones shooting people…that is why the Republicans do live in fear!

          1. bobnstuff says:

            Very funny. Since you are most likely to be shot by a family member or some one you know it would seem that it’s Republicans shooting Republicans.

          2. I Seigel says:

            Yeah, we’ve heard enough about Black on Black crime. It’s refreshing to hear about Republican on Republican crime. BRING IT ON!!!

    3. jnora says:

      Some of those protesters looked pretty darned evil. I guarantee those bikers that were at the Cleveland convention had guns to keep things nice and calm and it worked. They are always very patriotic. I heard their favorite first lady was Barbara Bush because she reminded them of their mothers. That is so sweet! Having been in a Harley Group myself, they are mostly pretty neat guys…mostly professionals. The others, we call the one percenters. They sure love this country and aren’t about to let anyone take it away from them. There are lots of bikers in this country, too!

      1. jnora says:

        If you show up in Sturgis, SD at the right time every year, you will see what I mean!

  • Glenn says:

    That would seem to invite trouble. A so called gun free zone. But wait, what about all the security that comes with those people and they carry guns every day. This is done just to make a stupid statement.

    1. Papa Bear says:

      Gun Free Zones ALWAYS invite trouble!

  • joe says:

    Could it be that today’s Democrats (who actually are children of the 60s and thus are accustomed to hiding their “stuff” from police in general) are frightened of police officers?

    1. I Seigel says:

      Black people of the 90’s are afraid of police officers too. Maybe try to have an honest conversation with one of them sometime. You might learn something.

      By the way, the vast majority of Bernie supporters, were born after the ’60s. Just another fun-filled fact that might have escaped your attention – or mention in the RWM

      1. joe says:

        Who mentioned “black” people? Not I…oh wait, YOU did. ***I*** specified Democrats and in specific, the current crop of Democrats.
        Neither did I mention Mr. Sanders, YOU did. Not all Democrats, not even the current crop thereof, support him but the _leaders_ of the Democratic Party who ARE children of the 60s support anyone whom they believe to be able to secure the throne for them.
        You obviously either do not understand my reference, which would label you much too young to have any opinion of the 60s other than what you have gathered from movies and TV shows, all totally inaccurate or you _were_ there, _did_ “participate” and are ashamed of it or still frightened to admit it.
        That, my friend, is a fact that seems to have escaped _your_ attention.

        1. jnora says:

          That Kaine is one of the goofiest politicians I have EVER seen. He acts like he is a taco short of a combination plate!

          1. Papa Bear says:

            Is that the same as five bottles short of a six pack? lol

          2. joe says:

            Who’s Kaine?

          3. jnora says:

            Hillary’s running mate…Tim Kaine. When he was imitating Trump last night, it was about as retarded as Hillary’s barking.

          4. joe says:

            Thanks…I realized that about the second that I had already punched the “GO” button. O well, that’s the internet for ya; firmly insert foot into mouth, echo globally

          5. Tony says:

            LOL…..But not as goofy as Elizabeth Warren!

          6. Papa Bear says:

            That’s for sure lol

          7. jnora says:

            Yeah…they could “goofy” their way across the U.S.! What a pair they would be. I think he will really hurt Hillary. She is screaming her acceptance speech now at the convention. Why does she always have to scream at us. Does she think we are deaf or too stupid to hear and understand her? They are definitely lying about Trump.

          8. Tony says:

            This says it all!

          9. jnora says:

            You got it, Tony. That is hilarious. I just saw Hillary’s “seizure easy” for the first time yesterday. There is definitely something wrong with that woman neurologically!

        2. I Seigel says:

          Actually, Joe, there’s a third possibility that you didn’t mention. That you completely misunderstood my response. And a fourth possibility is that you were very unclear in your post and I misunderstood you.

          1. joe says:

            Absolutely correct. Miscommunication is, unfortunately, rampant on the Web —IMO due to the lack of interpersonal clues, voice inflections, and the other parts of personal comms. but I still did not mention “black” people or Mr. Sanders.
            I did use some ’60s slang that either you did not understand or chose to ignore.

          2. I Seigel says:

            My understanding of your comment is that you implied – no, you ACTUALLY SAID – that the today’s Democrats “actually are children of the 60s and thus are accustomed to hiding their “stuff” from police in general) are frightened of police officers. So my comment to you is that there are other people – not born in the 60s – who are also Democrats. And there are other people – not born in the 60s – who are afraid of police officers, such as young black kids born much later. And there are lots of Democrats who were born after the 60s, like the majority of Bernie supporters.

            So, that’s my explanation of my reply to you, and why I used black kids and Bernie supporters as examples that your statement about Democrats is very narrow-minded.

          3. joe says:

            My statement may be very narrow-minded because today’s Democrat (UNLIKE the Democratic party with which I grew up and supported until the mid 1980s) is very narrow-minded, to the point of mono-mania

          4. I Seigel says:

            Very similar to today’s Republican Party, right? Except without the religion and the hate and the fear.

          5. joe says:

            Democrat was, at one time, a word that referred to someone who opposed aristocracy. It was a word that applied to the Democratic Party of my youth but no longer and the reason that I switched to the Progressive Liberal Party in 1965. Today’s Democratic party is comprised of the elites who wish only to rule over us serfs; people who no longer deserve the label of “Democrat”. Today’s Democratic Party is so similar to today’s Republican party as to present no appreciable difference in policy or government.

            The politicians are all in bed together and there is no difference between the political parties. ALL of the politicos are secretly laughing their collective bu.t.t. off at us over all the division that they have caused with their so-called differences.
            We really would be better off if we could remove the politician from the office and close the office for the remainder of the term or even better, close it permanently but humans are not ready to govern themselves so we are stuck with our elected royalty.
            Let’s be clear, neither party cares if the other party adds new features to the civil government coercion machine as long as both parties get their turns in the throne. The problem for us is not who sits on the throne in the Oval Office, the problem is the Brobdingnagian, monopolistic leviathan occupying and surrounding the Oval Office whose tentacles continue choking more and more of the life out of this country. Only the truly anti-establishment
            candidate who would promise to do less for the citizens and require more of them could possibly begin to relieve us of the burden that we have allowed the politicians to create upon our backs. How do you think that would go over?
            We *do* need to change the names though.
            The politicians have become our masters rather than our servants.
            They are out of control.
            It is time to vote _ALL_ of them out of office.
            We need to have a “REMOVE INCUMBENT” option on the ballot.

          6. I Seigel says:

            Thanks for a well-written and well-thought-out response. I find myself in agreement with much of what you say. Shocking!

            Is this entirely original, or are a few phrases lifted from another source?

          7. joe says:

            Thanks. As for your question, that’s all mine. I have “lifted” a few phrases from some of my previous posts and rants but it’s all mine.
            Caveat: as with any writing, there is possibility (read probability) that some of the phraseology actually is from an outside source but any such plagiarism is purely accidental and since no longer am I creating term papers, theses, & etc., I no longer care. I say that if the thought fits, wear it!
            One of my faves is the one about politicians being masters rather than servants. I have been posting that and variations of it for several years…since around late 2008 to set the general time.

  • Mark Pascucci says:

    I hope everyone remembers this forever. Also, with all the goons and robotic idiots, and armed-to-the-teeth Bodyguards protecting the Democraps, Police should avoid them anyway. Their manpower can be used to protect The People.

    1. I Seigel says:

      I think you’ve also had ” the goons and robotic idiots, and armed-to-the-teeth Bodyguards” protecting Trump, too. Armed bikers, white supremacists – you know, all those freedom-loving, patriotic Americans.

      1. Papa Bear says:

        Your assessment of the bikers who showed up in Cleveland couldn’t be farther from the truth. They were not “white supremacists” but instead were God fearing lovers of America and were willing to put their lives on the line to prove it.

        1. I Seigel says:

          I did not assess the bikers as white supremacists. I wrote the sentence with the proper comma placement, indicating they are 2 different groups. But I apologize if my wording was unclear. I still stand by my statement, however.

          1. Papa Bear says:

            Guess I just missed the pictures of all of the white supremacists filling the streets of Cleveland during the convention. Could you enlighten me as to where you saw all of those pictures or is that just the propaganda being spewed out by the DNC?

          2. jnora says:

            I just bet that some of them were even black.

          3. Papa Bear says:

            Now be careful, we wouldn’t want to be accused of being racist 🙂

      2. jnora says:

        Trump deserves to be protected. Isn’t it odd that the very week the Dems have their convention they let out Hinkley? Another mentally ill Democrat. ANYONE that tries to hurt any president should stay in prison or a mental health prison for LIFE…no exceptions!

      3. Mark Pascucci says:

        Even if that were true, at least Mr. Trump and his team don’t lock out Law Enforcement. Not inviting any Police into the Democrap National Commode shows the contempt that Democraps have for The Law.

        1. I Seigel says:

          You know, I’ve tried to find a corroborating news source about this story, and the only news media I can find that reported on this is Breitbart, which Fox and the other conservative media simply repeated. Is there actually another independent source – not just repeating Breitbart – that reported on this issue?

  • ewasonable says:

    It’s because the DNC wants the “black lives matter votes” at any cost. Trump wants the “all lives matter votes.”

    1. I Seigel says:

      All lives except immigrants, handicapped, Muslims, former POWs, not-model-quality women, etc. So what you REALLY mean is that Trump wants the “all WHITE CHRISTIAN lives matter” votes. He sure has got David Dukes vote!!

      1. Papa Bear says:

        You really do need to go on a koolaid free diet!

        1. jnora says:

          Most of these people are probably too young to remember that 1979 event.

  • Stephen J. Koach says:

    The murderous hag is guilty of Treason many times over of course she wants nothing to do with law and order.

  • Thomas Goss says:

    I say pull EVERY POLICE agency from the convention center and let the rioters do whatever they want, that’s the way it’s done in Baltimore. AND IF ANY OF THE DEMOCRATS GET KILLED SO WHAT, WHO GIVES A SHIT.

  • Beeotchstewie says:

    I did notice the GOP convention did not have a 4 mile long 8 foot high fence either. What we have here is a meeting of anti American socialist bigots who are carrying out Barry’s war on police, I so hope some of those who think this is a good idea need the police and they won’t be available, it would serve them right.

    1. Papa Bear says:

      The RNC did have fences put in place only after threats of “rioting and major violence” by the BLM movement and The New Black Panthers. Seems as though a couple of thousand Bikers for Trump put those protests to rest before they ever really got started. Good Job!!

  • Webb says:

    At the Convention of Democrats the Blue “out of sight, out of mind”…for one reason, VOTES!
    Vilifing Law Enforcement gets Votes for Democrats…Fact! ★★★

  • Luke says:

    When you call 911 be sure to mention if you’re a liberal or not..LOL
    After all the groups the demonrats have alienated from their party the only ones left to vote for them are the takers and the unAmerican trash

  • Allison Sims says:

    It’s time for Officerxit at the DNC–All of them. Since none of the progressives own guns to defend themselves, they can fend off intruders with a feather.

  • Sinnie Kemp says:

    DemocRATS show their true colour that they are officially let the American people know that are outlaw and that they are not just criminals but they are also above the law.

    1. jnora says:

      It IS hard not to think that, isn’t it?

  • Papa Bear says:

    Then maybe the uniformed police should not be on the outside of the convention center either … let’s see how that goes over. Typical Democratic behavior … we don’t want to show them any respect but they had damn well better protect us when we want them to … disgusting!!

    1. 1* says:

      I don’t believe **They= {those in BLUE} have a choice…last I checked civil service employees are bound by LAW to Protect & Serve regardless.

      1. Papa Bear says:

        And politicians are bound by law to honest and trustworthy but that doesn’t stop them … of course I am talking apples and oranges here but LEO are bound by their oaths to protect and serve and stand by their oaths while most politicians think that the oath that they take when entering office are merely words that really don’t mean a hill of beans to them.

        1. 1* says:

          it’s a double standard

          1. Papa Bear says:

            Of course it is but is the Democratic way anymore and shouldn’t surprise anyone.

        2. jnora says:

          Proof is the hard thing there Papa Bear.

          1. Papa Bear says:

            Especially within a corrupt system!

        3. I Seigel says:

          Yeah, absolutely right. Politicians like Dennis Hastert.

      2. Larry says:

        True, but they can stop for a coffee!

        1. Papa Bear says:

          a verrrry long coffee and I’ll even buy 🙂

          1. jnora says:

            Along with a handshake and a sincere thank you!

          2. jnora says:

            I just saw that Dinesh D’Souza’s movie “Hillary’s America” is showing here now. I hate to go to the movies by myself, but I am going to go see it. I love his movies. They are TRUE. It is very timely. I wish every Democrat could see it to see the truth about Hillary.

          3. Papa Bear says:

            Am looking forward to it coming to this area 🙂

    2. jnora says:

      Why is it that it’s only the Democrats that do it? Do they not see that?

      1. Papa Bear says:

        Is just the nature of the beast. Is a total lack of respect for anyone other than themselves but at the same time they demand that everyone respect everything that they do. They have been programed for so long that everyone is there to serve them regardless of what sleaze they perpetrate and that no one has any business telling them what they can and cannot do, illegal or not.

        1. jnora says:

          I have a hard time wrapping my mind around that because I just don’t think in those terms. Good is good and bad is bad. The Bible says that men will call good evil and evil good. Looks like we are there, doesn’t it?

          1. Papa Bear says:

            Is sad but sure does 🙁

  • used_to_be_a_liberal says:

    Although this is disgusting, it is also good news for the rest of us. Here is why. The Obama administration, that also includes the Hilda-Beast have been bashing police and the military for sometime now. Obama and his minions can not achieve their goal with-out the full 100% support of the police and the military. With-out that support they can not do anything extra-ordinary, as they would place themselves into danger in many areas.

  • USPatriotOne says:

    How much more of these Commie/Muslim/NWO/DemoRat/Elites can “We the People” take…it’s time for them to go DOWN..PERIOD..!!! God help us, PLEASE!

  • Delia Holloway says:

    I say take away ALL their police protection paid for by the city and county government.

    1. jnora says:

      Good one… Let them have their stats on TV… Would have good ratings and would help the Republicans immensely.

    2. 1* says:

      tax dollars paid by all citizens pay police salary NOT the government =hence :Civil Service Employee

      1. Papa Bear says:

        Problem is that the majority of those that expect LEO protection at the DNC are not the same citizens paying the taxes to support LEO in Philly or in any other city for that matter.

    3. kbfallon says:

      Hard to see how a Secret Service Agent with a family at home would take a bullet for HillHog…..the way she treats any authority figure–they should push her toward the danger.

      1. Papa Bear says:

        Does make you wonder how they put up with what they do. The Secret Service really do deserve a lot more respect than most people give them. Would LOVE to be a fly on their shirts as they go about their business with that sorry bunch!

        1. onefour says:

          She never gave respect to them while Bill was in the White House why would she start now?

          1. Papa Bear says:

            Good point!!

          2. Laurajferguson3 says:

            <<o. ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::::!!br833p:….,….

          3. champion2211 says:

            You want Bills career stats: Read below.

            BILL Clinton’s Military Career

            Oh! You didn’t know he had a military career

            Ah, Read on me buckos!
            Bill & Hillary got about $12 million for their to-be written memoirs.
            Here’s some help for them since their memories are getting old.

            Bill Clinton registers for the draft on September 08, 1964,
            accepting all contractual conditions of registering for the draft.
            Selective Service Number is 326 46 228.

            Bill Clinton classified 2-S on November 17, 1964.

            Bill Clinton reclassified 1-A on March 20, 1968.

            Bill Clinton ordered to report for induction on July 28, 1969.

            Bill Clinton refuses to report and is not inducted into the military.

            Bill Clinton reclassified 1-D after enlisting in the United States
            Army Reserves on August 07, 1969, under authority
            Of COL. E. Holmes.

            Clinton signs enlistment papers and takes oath of enlistment.

            Bill Clinton fails to report to his duty station at
            the University of Arkansas ROTC, September 1969.

            Bill Clinton reclassified 1-A on October 30, 1969,
            as enlistment with Army Reserves is revoked by
            Colonel E. Holmes and Clinton now AWOL and
            subject to arrest under Public Law 90-40 (2) (a) –
            registrant who has failed to report…
            remain liable for induction.

            Bill Clinton’s birth date lottery number is 311,
            drawn December 1, 1969, but anyone who has
            already been ordered to report for induction is INELIGIBLE!

            Bill Clinton runs for Congress (1974), while a fugitive
            from justice under Public Law 90-40.

            Bill Clinton runs for Arkansas Attorney General
            (1976), while a fugitive from justice.

            Bill Clinton receives pardon on January 21, 1977,
            from President Carter .

            Bill Clinton becomes the FIRST PARDONED FEDERAL FELON
            ever to serve as President of the United States .

            All these facts come from Freedom of Information requests,
            public laws, and various books that have been published,
            and have not been refuted by Clinton .

            After the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, President Clinton
            promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished .

            After the 1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed five U.S.
            military personnel,
            Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished .

            After the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia ,
            which killed 19 and injured 200 U.S. military personnel,
            Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished .

            After the 1998 bombing of U.S. embassies in Africa ,
            which killed 224 and injured 5,000,
            Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished .

            After the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole,
            which killed 17 and injured 39 U.S. sailors,
            Clinton promised that those responsible be hunted down and punished .

            Maybe if Clinton had kept those promises, an estimated 3,000 people
            in New York and Washington , DC , who are now dead
            would be alive today .

            THINK ABOUT IT!
            It is a strange turn of events.
            Hillary gets $8 Million for her forthcoming memoir.
            Bill gets about $12 Million for his memoir yet to be written.

            This from two people who spent 8 years being unable to recall
            anything about past events while under oath.

            Cdr. Hamilton McWhorter USN (ret)

            Please forward this to as many people as you can!
            We don’t want this woman to even THINK of
            running for President!

            HOW DO YOU SPELL ”
            “THE CLINTONS “………..

            God Bless You and Your Family!

            In God We Trust

            “When injustice becomes law, then Rebellion becomes duty!” ~ Thomas Jefferson

            How does this do for a felon?

          4. reggie says:

            Since CDR McWhorter died April 22, 2008, are you related? Where did you get this info? Thanks. Also It’s usually CDR.

          5. Roscoe says:

            Well, if it’s not a felon it will do until a felon shows up!

          6. champion2211 says:

            Sorry the felons were already there.

        2. jnora says:

          All of them that I have heard say that their favorite president to work for was Bush 41 and the least favorite was Clinton. Evidently, the Clintons treated them TERRIBLE and so condescendingly. Think about the poor Marine at the bottom of the helicopter stairs having to salute a draft dodger. Must really get them in the gut, wouldn’t you think?

          1. Born in the South and proud says:

            They should all get medals for performances above and beyond the call of duty.
            Trump 2016 Let Freedom Ring

          2. reggie says:

            Or hold the a$$s umbrella? If the clown’s butt was busted at that point, that military guy would have been the one to be court martialed for dereliction of duty.

        3. Born in the South and proud says:

          They go home and puke for a hour or so to get the evil out of their system. I have nothing but admiration for the Secret Service and Police officers. Like soldiers they are willing to put their lives on the line to protect the public and yes even the sorry ass politicians. When was the last time you heard of a politician going in harms way to help someone. They are too busy yelling, why aren’t those dam cops here when I need them. Tsk Tsk fool go learn to protect your self and leave the police officers along to protect the public. Which I will say that they do a fantastic job considering all the obstacles the idiots put in their way.
          Trump for America in 2016. God Bless the USA

        4. JB Wright says:

          It make me wonder how much respect the Secret Service actually deserves??? I don’t believe it is their job to protect tyrants

      2. jnora says:

        Or, accidentally slip.

      3. Born in the South and proud says:

        I believe they would accidently trip over their shoe laces. Awww justice is a beautiful thing. Trump 2016

      4. reggie says:

        I give them credit. I’d have to stay drunk 24/7 just to stomach my job.

  • David Stewart says:

    We’ve always known that crime is illegal in LaLa Land; for example the gun-free felon-free Chicago!

    1. I Seigel says:

      “gun-free Chicago”?? Huh?

      1. Papa Bear says:

        Chicago has some of the nation’s strictest gun control laws that only serve to take away guns from the people who legally own them. Recent discovery is that over 80% of the guns confiscated during a recent period were possessed illegally!! So much for their strict gun control laws. I would be willing to bet that probably close to 100% of the gun related shootings and murders were done with illegally possessed firearms … just saying 🙂

        1. I Seigel says:

          “Chicago has some of the nation’s strictest gun control laws…” Huh?? What the hell you talking about? What year are you living in? Are you one of those GEICO cavemen, living under a rock? Just got out of prison? You ever heard of the interweb, or a newspaper? Try looking up facts before you go spouting off, cause you just stepped into a big pile of your own papa bearsh*t.

          1. Papa Bear says:

            Ouch, guess I ruffled someone’s feathers but that is ok. You do your fact checking and get back to me when you discover that you are wrong. Hint, don’t go looking for true facts in the MSM because you certainly won’t find them there.

          2. I Seigel says:

            What are the facts then? Or are you too lazy to post some of your own, so that we can see the sources you rely on? And obviously you think the Chicago Tribune can’t be trusted. Why is that? What in their Mission Statement reveals to you that they’re a biased, left-wing propaganda instrument?

          3. Papa Bear says:

            You cant get much more MSM than the Tribune so keep looking.

          4. I Seigel says:

            I see. So you ARE too lazy to post some of your own news sources, so that we can see that you rely on non-biased media without an avowed ideology or religious or political leaning?

          5. Papa Bear says:

            Not the likes of the Chicago Tribune, that’s for sure but I would guess that you feel they are a non-biased media without an avowed ideology and without religious or political leanings.

          6. I Seigel says:

            And your non-biased source for news would be…? (for the 3rd time…)

          7. Papa Bear says:

            Like Larry said, try the FBI and just in case you can’t find it, the website is www dot fbi dot gov. Have fun and maybe you will learn some REAL facts.

          8. I Seigel says:

            The Chicago Tribune article is very current. What’s wrong with the facts as provided by them?

          9. savage says:

            Heil Siegel,you are the only socialist to comment on a capitalist site.where are the others?

          10. I Seigel says:

            I do have many “likes” for all the wonderful, intelligent comments I’ve made here, so there are those who agree with at least some of what I say. But you’re right, there aren’t very many. Which just goes to show how much more work I have left to do, bringing enlightenment to those who need it most. It’s something to do in my spare time while I collect all the free stuff from the government.

          11. I Seigel says:

            The REAL facts are that there is no information about Chicago gun laws on the FBI website because the laws were local jurisdiction. They weren’t federal laws. So, unless you got something else, you can just crawl away in disgrace. Or produce some actual, verifiable FACTS. So far, you and your friends haven’t produced squat. Just insult, innuendo and vague references to a treasure trove of info if you just click on this or this website. BS. You got nothing. Put up or shut up.

          12. Larry says:

            Try FBI source! Papa Bear is correct and you still are a dipshit!!

          13. Papa Bear says:

            Messing with the heads of the likes of him is such a fun pastime 🙂

          14. I Seigel says:

            Oh, please Larry, give us a link to the FBI information you’re referring to. Much appreciated.

          15. ARJAY says:

            LOOK it up YOURSELF you lazy so & so!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

          16. jnora says:

            I always heard that Chicago and DC had really strict gun laws.

          17. I Seigel says:

            That”s old news. The Chicago laws were overturned a year or so ago. I’d have to look up the status of the DC laws, but I’m pretty sure they were watered down, too. Courtesy of lawsuits by the NRA. Check it out for yourself.

          18. jnora says:

            Well, good for them! The results would have been the same. The crooks will ALWAYS have guns. As long as that is true, the public ALWAYS needs to have guns to protect themselves from the thugs. There are ways to childproof your guns. If your child gets your gun and shoots himself/herself, it is YOUR fault. Not a lot of parenting going on nowadays. That is one of the two main reasons for our country’s decline..the decline of the FAMILY. The other is the pushing out of God in the country. Go ahead, sneer at me if you like, but that is the truth. We were fine as long as God was the center of this country’s tenants. People took pride in their country and people were more honest and life was so much better. People didn’t live in fear as they do now. Seigel, there is hope for you yet. If you don’t believe in God, you should check out the people that do and see how nice they are. Yes, there are some hypocrites. Where better for them to be than at church? I would not have made it without my faith in God after the suicide of my son and the mental illness of my only other child, a son. I am not allowed to see my 2 local grandchildren of my son that died…for no reason other than that I gave birth to him. My other grandchild, a girl, is in Virginia and I see her only once a year. She is all I have left in the way of family. My blood family is all estranged because of my father’s will. I am all alone, but I have my Christian family that has been by my side ever since the suicide. My other son didn’t even speak to me at the funeral, nor did he even sit by me, but the attendees were 95% from the church I attend and none knew my son or his wife. There were 5 Christians (including the County Mayor…HUGE county) at my house 1/2 hour after I heard my son died and they were by my side even until now. If I need something, all I have to do is ask and someone steps up. They have paid for my counseling for 4 years now, even before my son killed himself. Yet, they expect nothing in return. THAT is what it is like to be around Christians. I, in turn, would jump through any hoops I could to help any of them and I do. Look to God, Seigel. If you chastise me, then I will take it. After all, Christ took unspeakable verbal and physical pain, did he not? I do NOT want to be adversarial, but rather kind, but I do stand up for my beliefs. If I have come across as mean, I apologize.

        2. savage says:

          you are right again,but that doesn’t happen to often.Chicago is the home town of Al Capone,and 80% of the Chicago’s police force is of italian descendent.I’ve got bad experience in Chicago many years ago,just switching planes to fly to Europe,and they confiscated my collection hand gun,made of silver and gold and being in a checked of the cops told me that if I’ll sell him the gun I still have plenty of time to cache my flight.

      2. 1* says:

        that was SARCASM ^^^^

        1. I Seigel says:

          Yeah, but the reason that it’s SARCASM is because the writer is completely ignorant of the FACTS. Try looking up the REAL state of the gun laws in Chicago, and then you’ll understand why the writer’s comment is so ignorant – and scary.

      3. jnora says:

        The Democrats are too stupid to understand that the crooks will always have guns. They break into every law, including killing people, do you think they are worried about breaking a gun law. We need to be able to defend ourselves. My ex-husband was a huge liberal. However he had guns becausehe had look down the barrel of a gun and a hold up. That’s all it takes, even for a diehard liberal.

        1. I Seigel says:

          Being a conservative doesn’t give you exclusive rights to the gun-owners’ club. Lots of liberals have legal, registered guns, too. What’s your problem? Many polls indicate that conservatives, as well as liberals, support stronger background checks and other measures to make sure guns are held by safe, sane people with no criminal ties or terrorist ties. Many polls also show that both conservatives and liberals don’t see the need for military assault rifles for hunting or personal protection, which, if you remember, was the selling point that the NRA has used to convince liberals that America needs guns.

          1. Larry says:

            You dip shit the NRA has never made any such selling point about guns being for hunting,an out right LIE by YOU. The NRA and the signers of our Constitution aimed(no pun) the 2nd Amendment is to protect ourselves from our Government..That is why we need semi auto weapons.

          2. I Seigel says:

            Really? The signers of our Constitution had in mind assault rifles? Or was it muskets? You dip shit with a memory like a sieve.

          3. Elaine says:

            If you actually believe that the Second Amendment is limited to muskets, then you’d better get used to someone telling you that your First Amendment right to freedom of the press and freedom of speech is hereby limited to using a quill pen and a megaphone. Our rights don’t change just because technology does. You might want to brush up on your understanding of the Constitution.

          4. Larry says:

            You stupid SOB we have been in the 21st century for a long time,Times change IDIOT

          5. I Seigel says:

            Times change, yes. But the Constitution doesn’t. Or are you forgetting that your pals Scalia, Thomas and Alito were or are strict constitutionalists who try very hard to interpret the Constitution according to their beliefs of the intentions of the Signers. The document, according to them, should NOT change with the times. So, you stupid SOB, tell me that you know so much and I’m wrong.

          6. Roxene Kimes says:

            so let me get this right.. as time marches on only the government gets to use new technology? The people and constitutional principals are stuck in 1776 while the government can threaten and HAS threatened its citizenry with drones? Typical brain dead libtard!

          7. reggie says:

            He gets paid.

          8. I Seigel says:

            See my response to Arjay, and please give me your thoughts.

          9. ARJAY says:

            Then why didn’t the founding fathers SAY that we ONLY have the RIGHT TO MUSKETS?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

            Pull your head out of your backside and COMPREHEND the meaning of the CONSTITUTION as written in the LANGUAGE OF THE TIME IT WAS WRITTEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!

          10. I Seigel says:

            Very good point Arjay. And you know what? That’s EXACTLY what I’ve said, many times here. And other lawyers, Supreme Court justices and citizens have said EXACTLY the same thing.

            So what you’re saying is that the Constitution was written with enough “wiggle room” intended so that, as society develops, the Constitution is intended to cover it.

            So when the Framers talked about the Common Good, or Commerce, they had in mind things that developed into the Interstate Highway System, the Federal Aviation Administration, and the Environmental Protection Agency. And the Department of Education, and the Department of Energy.

            Now, do you want to change your mind on what you posted, or do you want to continue on your “progressive”, modern interpretation of the Constitution? Or do you want to go back to the Scalia/Alito/Thomas interpretation of a static, non-evolving Constitution?

            I’m VERY interested to hear your response, especially if you can keep it insult-free. Thanks.

          11. ARJAY says:

            The Constitution gives the congress ENUMERATED POWERS, THAT means they can ONLY make laws that the Constitution gives them the AUTHORITY to make! And NOTHING ELSE!!

            All other lawmaking is left to the STATE’S LEGISLATURES to make!

            ONLY CONGRESS CAN MAKE LAWS, not those alphabet unconstitutional gubbermint created entities (that you named, plus MANY others)!!

            Congress has given up certain of their powers to AVOID THE WRATH of the voters, when they allow these ABC’s to act as LAWMAKERS! The are UN-ELECTED INDIVIDUALS that have NO accountability to ANYONE and UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

            COMPREHEND the meaning of the CONSTITUTION as written in the LANGUAGE OF THE TIME IT WAS WRITTEN!!

          12. I Seigel says:

            The Zika virus in Florida is making big news right now. Is it Congress’ job to do something about it, or each individual state’s? The CDC doesn’t have the authority to do anything, at least Constitutionally, right?

          13. reggie says:

            He can’t, it’s been stuck so long it’s swollen up.

          14. savage says:

            you should be at work at this time .or maybe you are,but you finished your job and your boss allowed you to surf virtual!?

          15. jnora says:

            We need to have guns at least as deadly as those who seek to kill us.

          16. I Seigel says:

            So if we get rid of assault rifles, eventually no one will be able to buy one or get ammo for them. So then youd be ok giving up your assault weapon? If those who seek to kill us don’t have or cant use assault rifles, then you’d have no need for them either, right?

          17. jnora says:

            They already have them and guns last a long, long time. They probably have enough ammo to kill half of America.

          18. Larry says:

            When has Obama went into Muslim country and took all of their rifles..assult,semi auto or bolt..Plenty of these goat humping ragheads running loose all over the world killing the young and old including children

          19. Born in the South and proud says:

            Those that seek to harm or kill us will always have auto rifles, big clips and plenty of ammo. That is why they are crooks and terrorist and they dam sure don’t obey any law regarding guns. If some how the government by hook or crook managed to take all guns away from decent honest citizens. This country would have a huge blood bath from crooks and terrorist because they would know no one was armed to stop them. Why do you think that terrorist shooters love GUN FREE zones, schools, Churches, theaters etc: it is because they know that they can have their way shooting to their hearts content for a good bit before the police will arrive on the site.

          20. I Seigel says:

            So maybe we should make it as hard as possible for those terrorist shooters to get their guns? Better background checks, waiting periods, consultations with terrorist watch lists, etc. will NOT be barriers to law-abiding citizens who want to arm themselves, but it will stop angry, unstable people bent on committing crimes and terrorism. No?

          21. ARJAY says:

            I didn’t realize that CRIMINALS BUY THEIR GUNS LEGALLY!!!!!!!!!

            So I guess that more stringent background checks WOULD REALLY WORK to keep guns out of the hands of CRIMINALS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

          22. savage says:

            yes asshole!you’re right on that aspect.

          23. I Seigel says:

            Like the say, a broken clock is right twice a day.

          24. Elaine says:

            Nobody can own a “military assault rifle” … except the military. They are automatic weapons. If you are talking about an AR or an AK, they are SEMI-automatic rifles, and aren’t “assault rifles”. The NRA has never advertised that guns are for “hunting”, and they aren’t trying to “convince liberals”. They are defenders of the Second Amendment, which was written so that we can defend ourselves against a tyrannical government. Strange … this current administration is trying to disarm us. Oh, right … that’s what tyrants do.

          25. jnora says:

            One of the Barretts (yes, those Barretts) told me they would first go after our ammo, so stock up everyone.

          26. savage says:

            there’s nothing to stock because FEMA bought all of it and is still buying it.

          27. jnora says:

            I think the Barretts still have it. The name of the place is called Outpost Armory in Murfreesboro, Tennessee. Look them up and give them a call and I’m sure they can help you. They are nice people.

          28. jnora says:

            I just looked them up and I guess they have a Christiana, Tennessee address. Their phone number is 615–867-6789. I guess it’s OK to put a phone number on here when it’s a business, isn’t it? They advertise that they have guns and ammo so I guns and ammo before it is too late. If you know of a rule about phone numbers please let me know and I’ll take it out. Just remember it is called the Outpost Armory in middle Tennessee. I’ll just bet you Willy Robertson has quite a stack of it!

          29. savage says:

            AK 47 is an automatic PISTOL,but works as well as a rifle.

          30. Elaine says:

            The AK-47 was designed by Avtomat Kalashnikova (AK) in 1947 (47) as an automatic-fire Soviet military weapon. There are numerous versions of the AK-47, and a modified SEMI-automatic version (pistol or rifle) can be purchased by civilians. No civilian can purchase a fully automatic weapon without a special license, and those licenses are somewhat difficult to obtain, but not impossible – lots of hoops to jump through. If someone without one of these licenses gets caught owning or possessing any automatic weapon …. they are off to prison.

          31. savage says:

            any semiautomatic ak 47 can be modified into an automatic ak 47,no exceptions.this is the kind of weapon I have used in the military service for year and a half.and is not a rifle,even if you can aim and kill at over 800 meters.

          32. Elaine says:

            ANY firing weapon can be modified into an automatic weapon. I’m curious as to which military you serve in. The AK-47 is not a US military issued weapon.

          33. savage says:

            actually ak 47 is an 1946 model.I’ve served in the military service of former Socialist Republic of Romania in 1980,while the military service was compulsory.ak 47 is a soviet developed weapon,and is still better than any US (M) works in any environment,at any temperature,in any conditions.never jams.

          34. jnora says:

            Sane people?

        2. Born in the South and proud says:

          Sort of like the old saying that there is no such thing as a aetheist in a fox hole under fire.

      4. ARJAY says:

        Of course it’s “gun free chicago”, after all, isn’t that THE LAW?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

        1. I Seigel says:

          no it’s not. try again. read and learn

    2. Buzz says:

      Add sanctuary cities..CO outlawed a few years back; however Denver still is…

      1. jnora says:

        That is my home town and that grieves me.

    3. Born in the South and proud says:

      That is a good one you need to have it printed on posters and bumper stickers. Bet you could sell a bunch.

  • Tiger says:

    Then don’t offer protection. Walk off let them get the Black Panthers and Nation of Islam to protect them. And by the way any Security of any of these pieces of excrement if you are true Americans walk off the job.

    Right now all true Americans walk off the job, let them simmer in their juices and let them be unprotected.

    What is the matter with all of you? Just do it.

    1. Douglas B Briggman says:

      I agree, you are a tiger arn’t you.

      1. Tiger says:

        Well I am blunt since a child. Raised by POW no nonsense people who didn’t take crap off anyone.


    2. jnora says:

      We should fence off those neighborhoods and allow the good people to come out, since the man with no police and let them kill each other. That sounds harsh but that’s what they seem to want. If they want no police protection then they lose freedom.

      1. kbfallon says:

        Then trouble with that–is there are a lot of decent folk who are vested in these areas and they need some consideration.

        1. jnora says:

          Since you wouldn’t have to pay the cops, set them up (vested) in a safer and better place. They would love it.

        2. jnora says:

          Since they won’t have to pay all those cops, they can really set those good people up great in a safer and nicer neighborhood. Help them move, fence the bad neighborhood in and throw some food in occasionally. It would be like a mass arrest…sort of like that movie, “Escape from New York,” one of my all-time favorites.

      2. Tiger says:

        I have said the very same thing before. You are a Pragmatist like me and millions of others, you see a problem and you look for answers politics and parties and all be damned.

        Matter of fact I am just about ready to let all the Liberals, refugees, illegals and blacks move into states that are filled with them and wall them off.

    3. Larry says:

      True Tiger, all the sorry scumbags who have 24 round the clock with ARMED guards and big walls think they are better than we. Mexico has a big wall on the Southern end and the Pope has a big wall and armed guards at the Vatican also..Screw these elite bastards! If we do not need guns then why do they?

      1. Tiger says:

        The age old story of the world they honestly believe we care if they are protected or not. Every time the word guns and control come out of O’s mouth gun sales are through the roof. Mexico has a wall to stop Hondurans and others. They are all hypocrites.

        History shows us what happens when the “Elites” put the boot on the necks of the peons, REVOLUTION.

    4. jnora says:

      It seems us women have the best answers. We are certainly no wimps, are we. Hillary is a wimp, though. Also, lets take away her Secret service and let the Black Panthers protect her…she is so in bed with them!

      1. Tiger says:

        Women down through the pages of history have indeed shown their strength and continue to do so today and it is sad to see a woman who claims she is for women make them out as such poor, little, helpless, chained creatures right up there with the blacks who have it so good on the Democrat Plantation they don’t know they are being used.

        I think if her numbers continue to drop along with her popularity and not drawing in the Bernie people or the Independents, Christians, Evangelicals, Police Unions and Border Patrol etc she might have one of those heart attacks like so many who pushed her buttons did.

        1. jnora says:

          She is only FOR one woman and that is herself. Taking that money from all those mid-eastern countries that treat women so badly proves it! Being for abortion proves it…think about all those poor FEMALE babies she is killing! It is just plain sinful and wrong!

          1. Tiger says:

            Yes I do think about the babies I watched every video that was made and they have been let off the hook and the video freed up now and they know it is truth so she will get hit with that also.

            She has taken money from everyone, everywhere. She also bullied the women that Billy messed with. I heard 5 of them talking on a Talk Show and they had never met before and boy were their stories similar. So she backed what Billy did. She has no pride or dignity or charity in her.

            She is a cold, cruel and evil woman. Surely she will get her due sooner than later.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Keep the Fake News Media in check.

Don’t let the MSM censor your news as America becomes Great Again. Over 500,000 Americans receive our daily dose of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness along with Breaking News direct to their inbox—and you can too. Sign up to receive news and views from The 1776Coalition!

We know how important your privacy is and your information is SAFE with us. We’ll never sell
your email address and you can unsubscribe at any time directly from your inbox.
View our full privacy policy.