Missing Libyan Jetliners Raise Fears of Suicide Airliner Attacks on 9/11

Islamist militias in Libya took control of nearly a dozen commercial jetliners last month, and western intelligence agencies recently issued a warning that the jets could be used in terrorist attacks across North Africa.

Intelligence reports of the stolen jetliners were distributed within the U.S. government over the past two weeks and included a warning that one or more of the aircraft could be used in an attack later this month on the date marking the anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks against New York and Washington, said U.S. officials familiar with the reports.

“There are a number of commercial airliners in Libya that are missing,” said one official. “We found out on September 11 what can happen with hijacked planes.”

The official said the aircraft are a serious counterterrorism concern because reports of terrorist control over the Libyan airliners come three weeks before the 13th anniversary of 9/11 attacks and the second anniversary of the Libyan terrorist attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi.

Four Americans, including Ambassador Christopher Stevens, were killed in the Benghazi attack, which the Obama administration initially said was the result of a spontaneous demonstration against an anti-Muslim video.

31 Comments - what are your thoughts?

  • gangbuster says:

    I kinda feel like there is going to something happening on 9/11 this ISIS where dealing with isnr going away its going to get stronger.

  • Carrie Barton says:

    We need to be on it!

    America is craving for a leader. One who is not afraid of taking charge. A person that will protect it’s citizens and make America strong. Help us keep America’s Republic strong. sign the petition for Dr. Carson to run in 2016.http://www.runbenrun.org/petition?recruiter_id=207883

    1. I Seigel says:

      It now looks like Obama has taken the leadership role in forming a coalition of allies to go after ISIS.

      What. No comments?

      1. Carrie Barton says:

        Yeah, why is he waiting and why did the French and English have to give him an ultimatum. This has nothing to do with 911 or the Iraq war. This has to do with the take over of Europe. By the way ISIS is outside Texas but don’t worry Reid says our boarders are secure.
        James O’Keefe as Osama bin Laden crosses border from …
        ► 6:25► 6:25

        1. I Seigel says:

          Are you trying to make a point?

          He waited to gather a coalition. The same strategy that Bush 1 used to good effect. What would you have had him do? Do you think the Republicans in Congress would have given him the go-ahead? They didn’t last summer, when he wanted to attack Syria.

          And what’s with the silly video? How old is it? 2 years old? 4? If its current, then where are all the National Guardsmen that Perry sent to the border a month ago? Or was that just for show, to make himself look good to the Iowa voters and the Tea Party?

          1. Carrie Barton says:

            You make me laugh. Since when did Obama do anything Congress wanted. He has his pen and his phone. You are a joke! here try some grape kool aid.

          2. I Seigel says:

            Since when did Congress do anything Obama wanted? Since when did Congress do ANYTHING – except shut down the government last year. Have the kool aid yourself. And a Nutty Buddy.

          3. Carrie Barton says:

            Obama never bothers talking, it is his way or the highway. The gov’t shuts down every weekend. The reason it was bad is because of what Obama did. It is the House that has the power of the purse when the President does not negotiate.


            Teddy Roosevelt: 3
            Others Prior To FDR: NONE
            FDR: 11 in 16 years
            Truman: 5 in 7 years
            Ike: 2 in 8 years
            JFK: 4 in 3 years
            LBJ: 4 in 5 years
            Nixon: 1 in 6 years
            Ford: 3 in 2 years
            Carter: 3 in 4 years
            Reagan: 5 in 8 years
            Bush 1: 3 in 4 years
            Clinton: 15 in 8 years
            Bush 2: 62 in 8 years
            Obama: 923 in 3+ years!

          4. I Seigel says:

            Ah, so you DID drink the kool aid AND ate the Nutty Buddy before posting. What kind of idiotic garbage are you trying to sell here? Where did you get these ridiculous numbers?!?!


            Teddy Roosevelt – 1,081
            Woodrow Wilson – 1,083
            Calvin Coolidge – 1,203
            FDR – 3,522
            Truman – 907
            Ike – 484
            JFK – 214
            LBJ – 325
            Nixon – 346
            Ford – 169
            Carter – 320
            Reagan – 381
            Bush 1 – 166
            Clinton – 364
            Bush 2 – 291
            Obama (up to now) – 187

            Obama, thru 5 1/2 years in office, had ONE HALF of the number of EOs compared to St. Ronnie.

            You’re not even CLOSE. Go back to LaLa Land and smoke your Funny Weed. Geez!! You ignoramus. You’re like an adult that never bothered to learn but thinks she knows everything. But congratulations – at least you post in complete sentences and your spelling is good. Keep up the good work.

          5. Carrie Barton says:

            It certainly wasn’t from Wiki pedia. LOSER! LMAO! Can’t stop laughing OMG tears are coming. Thanks for the laugh ! You made my point.

          6. I Seigel says:

            Oh, so you won’t or can’t provide the little bit of proof that I asked for? Too busy laughing, I guess. If you’ll notice, my link wasn’t to Wikipedia. Where’s your link? Still avoiding the truth, or any challenge to your “facts”. You should be crying for your own stupidity, not laughing. As they say, put up or shut up.

          7. Carrie Barton says:

            You are the poster child of COMMUNISM. You would be the first to run like the coward and hide. You are a NON INFORMATIVE voter. They love people like you.
            And if you think I typed all that information , well you are …. I found your link real easy because it is my job to research not just spit out things I here.

            You my friend, are a puppet.

          8. I Seigel says:

            Wait. You say your “job is to do research”?!?!? Now you’ve got me LMAO. Wow, are you a volunteer, or do you actually get paid for this “research”? Minimum wage, I’ll bet. But you STILL have chosen not to provide any sources for your information. Interesting. Talk about being a puppet – you’re just dangling from strings while some right-wing websites make you look like a mindless moron.

            I’ll give you a choice now – give me the FIRST 5 executive orders signed by Obama OR give me 2 different websites that support your “research” OR just be quiet.

          9. Carrie Barton says:

            Not hard to find. Are you in grade school? Just asking.

          10. I Seigel says:

            Tick tock, Carrie. Tick tock. Got nothing, huh? It’s getting pretty obvious by now. I’ve provided one independent source – from a university, non-partisan academic. I have another one waiting to show you. But first, you need to put your cards on the table. Tick tock. You’re really starting to embarrass yourself now.

            By the way, I love your line, ” I found your link real easy because it is my job to research not just spit out things I here.” Yes, you found it because I included it with the information I posted. You research genius, you.

          11. Carrie Barton says:

            Don’t bother to read. looked at your stats and checked it out for my self that is what a conservative does. BOO YA! Do you your homework. Even my kid found it.

          12. I Seigel says:

            Excellent! Then since you seem to be incapable of posting a link to your info, please have your kid do it. I found several identical lists on various websites of the info you posted. I must say, it’s rather mysterious that these websites all post the identical list, identical wording, identical order – almost as if it just came from one source and all these other websites copied and pasted it into theirs. But I want you to show us your source. Or rather, I want your kid to show us where you do your “research”.

            And please have your kid find and post the FIRST FIVE executive orders that Obama signed. Is that REALLY too much to ask, for a research pro like yourself and your kid? C’mon, show us how a CONSERVATIVE does it. Make your fellow Tea Partiers proud. Boo Ya!

          13. Carrie Barton says:

            BOO YA! You are so full of your self. You can’t even find a link and then try to change the subject. You are incapable of researching. This is so funny. You brag about how you know so much; about nothing.

            Political and economic doctrine that emphasizes the rights and freedoms of the individual and the need to limit the powers of government. Is this you?

          14. I Seigel says:

            “You can’t even find a link and then try to change the subject” – WHAT are you talking about? I can’t find WHAT link? What subject am I trying to change? Seems like it’s you who keeps dodging my simple request for a link, or proof of your figures, and the FIRST FIVE EO’s that Obama signed. That can’t be too much to ask of a research expert like you.

            “You are incapable of researching.” – I’ve done the research and posted one link so far. What have you posted, other than a list of numbers? No source, nothing. Just numbers. BS.

            All this typing, but you can’t find the time or energy to cite references and provide the information that I’ve requested.

            Or just a Communist Prole, mimicking what you’re fed. You’ve got nothing to offer.

            You fail.

          15. CowsomeLoneboy says:

            Carrie isn’t here to engage in meaningful dialogue. She spends all her time from morning through late night finding various websites where she can copy and paste her boilerplate verbiage about drafting Ben Carson to run for president, as if his outsized ego would require such a draft.

            I found your whole exchange amusing in how you drew her out to tacitly acknowledge that her ironclad opinions will never be swayed by facts or rational arguments and that she doesn’t have to prove any stuff she makes up or swallows whole. She’s entirely representative of the basic conservative mindset one encounters on all these comment streams–incapable of admitting they’re wrong and incapable of learning anything. It may be sport to draw them out, but let’s admit it–with so many of them out there, it seems as citizens of this great nation, we’re f**ked.

          16. I Seigel says:

            It’s like playing Whack-a-Mole and losing. Rather disheartening.

          17. CowsomeLoneboy says:

            Precisely! At least in Whack-a-Mole you sometimes get the satisfaction of getting your frustrations out. Here it just creates more.

  • The duck says:

    Every nation that has been under attack of radicle Islam needs to be on the alert for Unidentified aircraft. They need to shoot them down wherever they fly. Thanks Obama for taking out Gadhafi. He had Libya under control and you sir disturbed the area politically and gave your Muzzie buddies operational space.

  • defiant1 says:

    “President Reagan worried about terrorist hijackers using airplanes as weapons way back in 1983. He banned Libyans from taking flight lessons or nuclear studies in the United States. Now, believe it or not, President Obama is lifting that ban because, aides say, post-Gaddafi Libya and its relations with the United States are “normalized.” We just abandoned our embassy there last month. Now we have missing Libyan planes. How did they get those planes, were they part of the gun running that was taking place in Benghahi where Chris Stevens was doing the bargaining. Is that why the military was told to stand down, because Obama wanted Stevens killed? Gee these things seem to all be part of the bigger puzzle. Is Obama the puzzle maker? Who is he and what is he doing with the islamofascists??

    1. I Seigel says:

      Nice way of picking and choosing your news reports.

      Let’s go back a couple years. Bush had a team that was working to normalize relations with Gaddafi while he was still in power. After Gaddafi relinquished his nuclear ambitions and admitted to Libya’s role in the downing of the PanAm jet over Lockerbie, Scotland, it seemed the right thing to do. Plus, you know that Bush’s team – Halliburton, Bechtel, et al – was all about OIL. Later, a former Assistant Secretary of State under Bush, who at the time worked for Bechtel, was working behind the scenes during the Obama administration to weaken the rebels and the NATO effort to overthrow Gaddafi.

      The effort to continue normalizing relations was continued by Obama after Gaddafi was overthrown. That policy is now “on hold” following the attack in Benghazi and the current mayhem there.

      Things are changing rather quickly in that part of the world, if you haven’t noticed. Don’t cite a news story that’s a year or 2 old as current news. It’s very misleading.

      1. Ranchman says:

        News Flash, Seigel, Bush is yesterday’s news, Obama the usurping fraud is illegally in office now and the situation on the ground in Libya is much different. Qaddafi is dead, Islamic radicals are in charge and we’ve had our embassy and ambassador killed. That, Seigel, is NOT a two year old story, it’s today’s news and very relevant.

        1. I Seigel says:

          News Flash, Ranchman. While you’ve been living under a rock for the past few years a few things have happened.

          Qaddafi is dead. Yes, it happened 3 years ago.

          We’ve had our embassy and ambassador killed. Yes, it happened 2 years ago.

          Islamic radicals are in charge. Yes, it’s been happening for the past 2 years.

          Everything you’ve mentioned is OLD NEWS, Ranchman. Now crawl back under your rock. Or empty out the rocks from your head.

          And sorry, how is Obama “usurping”? I get the fraud part and the in-office-illegally part. What has he usurped?

          1. insaney says:

            So Chris Stevens life is old news? Who cares, it happened two years ago? YOU ARE PATHETIC.

          2. I Seigel says:

            That’s not what Ranchman said. That’s not what I said. You’re making a pathetic stretch to fit your agenda. Get your head out of…wherever it is.

  • Thomas Goss says:

    ANY unidentified aircraft entering US air space shoot them out of the sky no questions asked. PERIOD

  • Death2Unions says:

    Whatever the easiest route is into the USA will be the one taken.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Keep the Fake News Media in check.

Don’t let the MSM censor your news as America becomes Great Again. Over 500,000 Americans receive our daily dose of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness along with Breaking News direct to their inbox—and you can too. Sign up to receive news and views from The 1776Coalition!

We know how important your privacy is and your information is SAFE with us. We’ll never sell
your email address and you can unsubscribe at any time directly from your inbox.
View our full privacy policy.