Sarah Palin ‘would win hands down,’ if not for the media, her husband Todd says

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin would win a race for the White House with little difficulty if it weren’t for the media that hated conservatives, her husband Todd said.

His exact words, to Inside Edition: She “would win hands down, in my mind, if the media did their job and presented each candidate on experience and their policy and their ideas.”

Instead, members of the media try to sway and influence the direction of elections and steer voters toward their personal choices, he said, Breitbart reported.

22 Comments - what are your thoughts?

  • Nattibratti says:

    I have said many many times before. That America is not ready for a woman President. But I have been corrected. Sarah Palin has everything it takes to be the next president. And she has my vote if we can convince her to run. Sarah would beat the pants off of Hillary. Pleas run for the President Sarah Palin.

  • paintinc56 says:

    Everyone that knew of Sarah Palin BEFORE 2008 LOVED her, including her Alaskan constituency. The excitement & hope she brought to the McCain campaign was electrifying! Soros nearly $hit his drawers, shortly thereafter over $500 BILLION was stripped out of our banking system & suddenly we had an economic COLLAPSE, RIGHT BEFORE THE ELECTION, what a coincidence!
    After Soros & the rest of the LEFTIST/DEMOCRAT billionaires club got done manipulating & partially collapsing our banking system, ObaMAO, the leftist propaganda machines Marxist messiah, was ASSURED victory.
    Sarah Palin has been painted as a moron, she is a college graduate, REAL college, not ELITIST, LEFTIST brainwashing camp, a mother of 5, was a mayor, a governor & served on the oil & gas conservation commission in Alaska, things a drooling halfwit usually can’t master. As for her foreign affairs knowledge, I can GUARANTEE YOU that if the P O S media had asked Obama ANY GOTCHA questions he would have come across far worse than she did! How many U.S. presidents have been foreign affairs experts? Biden was considered such an expert if that tells you anything. Obama has OFFENDED EVERY ONE of our allies & has made an A S S out of the U.S. all over the world. Thank God we didn’t have that country bumpkin, right?

    1. I Seigel says:

      Let’s try dealing with REALITY a little bit, shall we?

      First, your claim that “Everyone … BEFORE 2008 LOVED her…” Yes, she easily won her elections to the Wasila City Council, getting all of 651 (!!!) votes in one election. As the mayor of Wasila, she ran as an incumbent and won 74% of the vote – all 909 of them!!!

      But then things got a little more difficult for her. She lost a gubernatorial primary race in 2002. She won the 2006 Republican gubernatorial primary race 51% to 30% for 2nd-place finisher. She got elected to Governor by a 48%-41% margin, getting 114,700 votes. She didn’t get a majority of the votes in that election.

      So you can hardly claim that “Everyone LOVED her”.

      The next of your “facts” – or did you simply IMPLY? – that George Soros caused the collapse of our banking system, makes my head spin. I live and work very close to the old headquarters for Washington Mutual Savings. In my work, I heard many meetings with the CEO and other officers and the employees. Kerry Killinger, the CEO, was lying to his employees and to the public up to the day that Chase bought them out. Lehman Brothers declared bankruptcy and couldn’t get the Bush Administration to bail them out, as they had AIG. Soros had nothing to do with it, at least not by manipulation of the market, as you claim.

      As to your claim or implication that Sarah Palin is an intellectual powerhouse – are you referring to these “gotcha” questions”.

      “CHARLIE GIBSON: What insight into Russian actions, particularly in the last couple of weeks, does the proximity of the state give you?

      PALIN: They’re our next door neighbors and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.

      GIBSON: What insight does that give you into what they’re doing in Georgia?

      PALIN: Well, I’m giving you that perspective of how small our world is and how important it is that we work with our allies to keep good relation with all of these countries, especially Russia. We will not repeat a Cold War. We must have good relationship with our allies, pressuring, also, helping us to remind Russia that it’s in their benefit, also, a mutually beneficial relationship for us all to be getting along. ”

      Then Palin defended her comments on how Alaska’s proximity to Russia enhanced her foreign policy experience in an interviewe with Katie Couric:
      “COURIC: You’ve cited Alaska’s proximity to Russia as part of your foreign-policy experience. What did you mean by that?

      PALIN: That Alaska has a very narrow maritime border between a foreign country, Russia, and on our other side, the land — boundary that we have with — Canada. It, it’s funny that a comment like that was — kind of made to cari — I don’t know. You know. Reporters —

      COURIC: Mocked?

      PALIN: Yeah, mocked, I guess that’s the word, yeah.

      COURIC: Explain to me why that enhances your foreign policy credentials.

      PALIN: Well, it certainly does because our— our next door neighbors are foreign countries. They’re in the state that I am the executive of. And there in Russia—

      COURIC: Have you ever been involved with any negotiations, for example, with the Russians?

      PALIN: We have trade missions back and forth. We— we do— it’s very important when you consider even national security issues with Russia as Putin rears his head and comes into the air space of the United States of America, where— where do they go? It’s Alaska. It’s just right over the border. It is— from Alaska that we send those out to make sure that an eye is being kept on this very powerful nation, Russia, because they are right there. They are right next to— to our state.
      Sorry, but these don’t sound like coherent, thoughtful answers. They sound like the same mumble jumble that we got from W for 8 years.
      If you asked me, I’d want the smartest guy or woman in the room to be my leader. Mrs Palin went to school a couple of semesters in Hawaii, and then a community college in North Idaho. Then she won a beauty contest in Wasila (she was Miss Congeniality!!!). Then she went back to school in Moscow, Idaho for a while, went to a small school somewhere in Alaska, and then back to Moscow, ID and graduated from Univ of ID. I’ll take the man or woman out of an “ELITEST” school (did you forget that W went to Yale??) over Mrs Palin’s academic resume anyday.

  • Janie Fultz-Reinhart says:

    She is the best runner ,We know where we stand with her.

  • Janie Fultz-Reinhart says:

    I would vote for Sarah Palin

  • ralfo says:

    Sarah Palin would clean Hillarious’s clock in the race for president. She’s been raked over the coals & has been vetted to the Nth degree but still is on her feet & raring to go. Hillarious has blood on her hands & in a debate, Sarah wouldn’t be afraid to take her to task for our four dead at Benghazi. Sarah might have some blood on her hands but it would be that of a moose, bear, or other game animal. The lame stream media will be rooting for a woman for the presidency in 2016. If Sarah runs I’m certain she’ll win, hands down. If a man runs against Hillarious he’s going to lose. My money is on Sarah if she chooses to run the gauntlet & she has my vote & donations. Adios!

  • MaranathaMark says:

    Is Palin the most conservative person in the GOP ranks, no. Is she as conservative as Ted Cruz or Rand Paul, no! But she is far to the right of the likes of McConnell, McCain or Romney. That said, too many GOP folks are about a half inch deep, which allows the damage done by the media to make her a hard sell for the White House at this point. This being the case, she still should be a vary good option for the Senate or House, and could offer some very much needed conservative muscle in either house. I admire the Palin’s taking the crap they taken and still maintaining a civil attitude. And despite what some folks posting here seem to think, the many interviews I’ve seen Sarah do, she comes across as very intelligent and conservative. She is certainly heads and shoulders more intelligent and qualified for the White House then the offerings of the DNC – Obama, Clinton, Biden, Kerry, etc.!

    1. Rattlerjake says:

      Realistically she is heads above any of the previous libturd presidents, and both of the Bush’s too. A strong conservative woman scares the HE!! out of all libturd women because they know they are not good enough to clean her toilet. I’ve never been an advocate of women in government or leadership positions, but Sarah Palin is one of a kind and only comes around once in a lifetime.

    2. I Seigel says:

      Let us hope she decides to run. The real winner will be Saturday Night Live. Even Tina Fey has a more realistic chance of getting elected than Almighty Sarah.

  • rhondareichel says:

    how’s that for an unbiased source?
    I wouldn’t vote for her – she’s not constitutional for one thing
    a dummy who parrots FOX talking points isn’t what we need now

    1. MaranathaMark says:

      Rhonda I would hardly consider you an “Unbiased” source! Truth of the matter is, I seriously doubt that you have one ounce of the toughness or 1/10th of the brains Sarah Palin has. I would bet a dollar to a dime, that if you had a 1/3rd of the media attacks leveled at you and your family, that the Palin’s have had, you’d fold like house of cards in a tornado! I don’t know what your beef with Palin is, or why you think she is “dumb”, cause you obviously haven’t seen the interviews I’ve seen of her, but either way, you come across as what I’ve heard folks referred to as a “Troll”.

      1. Eugene Sevene says:

        It is hard to get a liberal to see what Obama is up to for they believe every word he says so they can get their handouts.I can not think of any other reason why a person would not do the research and compare Obama to Hitler. The liberal takers are getting theirs for now. I wonder what they will do when the money is no longer there to send the check and they have to work for what they get.

        1. I Seigel says:

          Hitler, huh? Can you describe any research YOU’VE done to reach a valid comparison between Obama and Hitler?
          And could you please name a specific handout or 2 that the “liberal takers” are getting? Are you talking about all those liberals in Texas that got federal drought relief? Or all the liberals in red states like Missouri, Kansas, the Dakotas, etc that got federal flood relief when the Missouri and the Mississippi Rivers flooded? Or all the liberals in Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi and Florida (oh yes, the bluest of states!) that got federal money to clean up BP’s oil mess? Or all the seniors – Democrats AND Republicans AND Tea Partiers – who get Social Security and Medicare checks. Or all the people out of work – Democrats AND Republicans and, I’m sure, a couple of Tea Partiers – who were collecting unemployment insurance? Or all the wealthy farmers – Republicans, Tea Partiers like Clint Didier included – who are recipients of HUGE handouts in the form of “subsidies”? And oil companies? I wonder if the Koch Brothers have gamed the system to get federal handouts? Wanna make a small bet that they have??

  • EaglesFlight says:

    Millions of us would LOVE for the chance to Vote her into the Presidency

    1. rhondareichel says:

      YEP….about the same as McCain and Romney had

      1. MaranathaMark says:

        Rhonda, if you were half as smart as you think you are, your opinion would almost be worth the time it takes to read it! If you think Palin is any where near as liberal as McCain or Romney, you obviously are just a Progressive here to stir up a stink! Anyone who has listened to Palin, knows she got the shaft 1st by the media and then by the Progressive side of the GOP, including her running mate, McCain, who wouldn’t have been with 20 point of Obama, were it not for Palin being on the ticket!!!


    1. rhondareichel says:

      Oh baloney…..she supported TARP

      1. frankenbiker says:

        Big deal, how many other representatives in both partys supported TARP? Look at what we have now, and tell me she couldn’t do a more honest job than Hitlery, or Biden, that just makes me laugh by the way. I really do hope he try’s to run.

      2. And i bet you think this Moron you put in thr is doing a good job.Well he is, He is tearing this country apart, if they dont get rid of him soon you can call him your counterfeit king. And your only problem is Tarp, Your about as dumb as he is.

  • I Seigel says:

    Wow! The Washington Times sure scooped the liberal media on this story! Now this is REALLY news!
    And this reporter actually gets paid?!

    1. BH says:

      No, the liberal media , if they were smart enough to find this story, would have said “can you believe anyone would think we are biased?”. They think they report straight down the line, dummies.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Keep the Fake News Media in check.

Don’t let the MSM censor your news as America becomes Great Again. Over 500,000 Americans receive our daily dose of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness along with Breaking News direct to their inbox—and you can too. Sign up to receive news and views from The 1776Coalition!

We know how important your privacy is and your information is SAFE with us. We’ll never sell
your email address and you can unsubscribe at any time directly from your inbox.
View our full privacy policy.