Trump’s phones tapped at Trump Tower’? Was federal surveillance authorized by a judge?

by DailyMail.com
March 5, 2017

‘Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my ‘wires tapped’ in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!’ the president wrote on Twitter.

McCarthyism, which the president used in his first tweet, is the practice of making accusations of subversion or treason without proper regard for evidence.

Trump started tweeting shortly after 3.30am ET and posed the question: ‘Is it legal for a sitting President to be ‘wire tapping’ a race for president prior to an election?’

In another tweet Trump said it was a ‘new low’ for the former president, compared it to ‘Nixon/Watergate’ and called Obama a ‘bad (or sick) guy’.

Ben Rhodes, the former policy advisor for Obama, blasted Trump’s accusations on Twitter: ‘No President can order a wiretap. Those restrictions were put in place to protect citizens from people like you.’

236 Comments - what are your thoughts?

  • barbarakelly says:

    S to Ben Rhodes.!!! YOu serve a devil and you will go down like he will. He is the snake in the grass that doesn’t know his limitations moron/.!!!

  • justinwachin says:

    This needs to be investigated. If it is found to be true, those involved in this scheme need to be publicly identified and prosecuted to the full extent of the law. It’s time we stop running our nation like a third world dictatorship.

    We may need to rethink the whole FISA court system if they are granting wiretaps against political opponents.

  • Ramon1710 . says:

    Ben Rhodes, the former policy advisor for Obama, blasted Trump’s accusations on Twitter: ‘No President can order a wiretap.’
    Just like no President can legally order up FBI files on their political enemies. Oh, wait, what about the Clintons and Filegate?

  • randy jackson says:

    I do not believe a word that Ben Rhoades utters. Ovomit is a lying MF. Is now, has been and always will be. His entire administration and the DemonRAT party are rife with habitual liars.

  • Annrcase says:

    Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours & have longer with friends and family! !do86c:
    On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    !do86c:
    ➽➽
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialCashJobs375DirectStationGetPaid$97/Hour ★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫::::::!do86c:….,….

  • Joe Don says:

    Lets not forget that Putin voted over 10 million times for Trump thus helping him win the election…… and Ohole’s birth certificate is real.

  • Wilbor Gavin says:

    If Obola’s Administration had any damaging information on President Trump or anyone on his staff it would have been front page news all over the world before the election. They would not have had to result to calling his wife a whore and his ten year old son a future serial rapist and murderer. That is how I know this Russian crap Is, a fake news story and deliberate treason by democrats, Obola, and the intelligence services.

  • Wilbor Gavin says:

    Another main point is, did Obola Administration lie to a judge to get a wiretapp on President Trump.

    1. Ramon1710 . says:

      That’s about all he’s capable of. Truth is repugnant to Bathhouse Barry.

  • Tiger says:

    Amen and I too pray for this. Imperative to our nation’s survival.

  • CharlieSeattle says:

    Can’t Melania keep Trump in bed at 3:30 am??

    Accusations are not proof!

    Where is the proof?

    1. Michael Lloyd says:

      You are of course referring to the Democrat’s and Obama’s accusations against Trump. Aren’t you?

      1. CharlieSeattle says:

        Wow! YOU are SHARP!

  • CBUJAN says:

    I new before Obama was out of office he would continue his assault on President Trump and America. This poor excuse of a man belongs in jail with Hillary.

  • Askjrsk says:

    Laws didn’t stop Obamas but OBAMAGATE is not RICHARD NIXON however, ITS ABOUT PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP and interfering and Messing with PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP. This will have a good end. The smoking gun will be found which directly involves OBAMA. What about Russian ambassador those donuts and Pelosi and Schumer? Great diversion REICHMASTERS off relevant and in touch issues WE THE PEOPLE WANT TO GET TO.
    LORETTA LYNCH recently tweeted there will be blood in the streets. She must mean. OBAMA CLINTON PELOSI SCHUMER GRAHM JARRETT MCCAIN including
    but not limited to her own spilled blood.
    THATS WHAT YOU MEANT THERE ” MEET ME ON THE TARMAC BILL “, LYNCH isn’t it?

  • Marc Goldstone says:

    Obama’s spying on his political opponents is despicable, and it’s just what is needed to have the SCOTUS rule on the definition of “Natural Born Citizen” as it was understood by the framers. Vattel’s The Law of Nations used by the framers defined in section 212 that a Natural Born Citizen is a child born of two Citizen parents. Obama’s clearly fraudulent long form birth certificate states that his father was a British Subject and thus former President Obama notwithstanding Nancy Pelosi’s determination to the contrary was ineligible to hold the office. Is it any surprise that the usurper in chief would subvert the intelligence agencies for his own nefarious purposes?

    1. Retired says:

      Didn’t you know Kenya was part of the US when Obozo was born

  • maxx says:

    If it was actually authorized, which I doubt, it would have been a democrat judge. However, when it comes to Ovomit he never did anything that was not illegal, questionable or unconstitutional. Was Trump under surveillance? I would say yes, he, his businesses and his family members. Maybe Congress should ask Assange and Snowden. They are 100000 times more honest than any democommie alive today.

  • Webb says:

    Holder and Lynch need to be put under Oath.

    1. Ramon1710 . says:

      Lying under oath is no problem for communists and muslims.
      “I did not have sex with that woman.” – Bill Clinton

  • Rusell Reitz says:

    TEXRANCHER SAID IT BEST. LAWS DON’T STOP OBAMA. HE MAKES HIS OWN LAWS AND ” YOU ” THE “MOST” PEOPLE LOVE TO LIVE WITH THESE LAWS. IT MUST BE NICE TO HAVE OBAMA BULL THEM AROUND.
    ONLY ‘ YOU ” THE PEOPLE WITH MYOPIA CONDITIONS LIKE THIS GUY
    AND HIS WAYS.

  • mudguy1 says:

    Ben Rhodes’s is right “No President can order a wiretap” We had a king not a President. Obama was not a real President.

  • Rodzzz says:

    Treason is a very serious offense against one’s country and therefore must be fully investigated with every unwavering effort to root out those intent of its downfall. Our government is at stake and needs more than a twitting bird to protect it.

    1. Webb says:

      Obama’s Gone…Government is no longer at Stake.

  • Philip Allen says:

    It sounds to me if the laws were in place to protect us from people like President Obama and Ben Rhodes. t seems to me these are the people that needs to be in prison. Obama is a traitor and committed treason. He let terrorist go from Gitmo Prisons that returned and helped our enemy. He also aided and abetted our enemy Iran a terrorist country an sponsor and supporter of terrorism by giving them 1.7 billion dollars in money and currency and by making a deal with them. Obama should have been tried criminally for being a traitor and for treason

  • Rodney Steward says:

    Too many of the BOY’S left overs in every crack of the system and they’re not going to stop till they start an all out war!

  • DrBillLemoine says:

    No, Donald, this is not McCarthyism where unfounded and unwarranted attacks are made on citizen-opponents of a sitting U.S. Senator in the guise of fighting communism. Any eavesdropping in Trump toward is FISA approved warrant-issued, judge-approved pursuit of Russians who are conducting anti-American activities like espionage and political manipulation by Trump Tower people. No wiretaps are legal in this country without such warrants given for cause by 9 special judges, selected by Pres. Bush to evaluate requests for wiretapping. There is no rogue listening by government agents in an unaccountable way. You are distracting investigators and the general public from real communications by your campaign affiliates with known Russians who intend harm to America.

    1. Ken says says:

      OMG Billy – you need to sit down and have a talk with Edward Snowden and find out how good eavesdropping in the USA is.

      1. DrBillLemoine says:

        You are confusing wiretapping with hacking–not the same thing.

        1. Ken says says:

          Good word games Billy – the results are all the same – snooping, tracking and getting the upper hand. Testimony about how OUR GOVERNMENT does it would probably be no surprise to you.

          1. DrBillLemoine says:

            Time for you to pick up a dictionary. You need help with word meanings. Wiretapping is court controlled; hacking is illegal. No games there, phrasing by you that shows a lack of understanding either deliberate or for diffusion. Our laws conform to the Constitution, Mr. Cynic.

          2. NM Leon says:

            Time for you to learn to do some research Bullschitte Billy. The government legally hacks people all the time. “wiretapping” was a term invented to denote tapping old landline phones, but since cell phones and computers has come to mean electronic surveillance in general.

            https://www.cnet.com/news/rule-41-you-cant-hide-from-government-hacking-warrant/

            You really are kind of a dim bulb, aren’t you?

          3. Ken says says:

            Illegal wire tapping is as common as hacking – let’s just get Snowdon back in the Country so he can testify how our Government does it to everyone.

          4. DrBillLemoine says:

            We’re talking ex-presidential illegal wiretapping here. There may be illegal hacking, but nobody knows its extent, regardless of your certainty of ‘common’ occurrence. You frankly don’t know. Neither does traitor Snowden.
            The government unlike those illegal hackers like Russia and China is restrained by law and Constitution. I’m sorry you are so cynical about our guiding principles and statutes for law and order. Not me. Trump and now you are whistling past the graveyard as there’s NO EVIDENCE of such illegalities by officials. You are watching too much MacGyver fiction on cable tv.

          5. Ken says says:

            Billy – you have a problem with reality. “Traitor” Snowden IS one of the Citizens Patriotic American Heros. He exposed one of our enemies within. I suspect NSA is still not under control and will take a long time before it operates in the best interest of the USA and its Citizens. This is old news and I don’t have time to spend on it when there are so many important current problems in front of us. You can’t debunk the Elite Establishment.

          6. DrBillLemoine says:

            You are clearly watching too much MacGyver. Hacking is illegal and not done without court supervision by government. NSA was not hacking under Snowden, although he may have hacked. Don’t expand that rogue’s actions to others in government. NSA was always under FISA court supervision requiring warrants; and, the metadata collected was not pinpointed to individual Americans unless spyders identified patterns that attracted anti-terrorist attention leading to wiretapping and reading correspondence–again, under court supervision.

          7. Ken says says:

            Billy – you are a skilled and articulate spokesperson for the Wealthy Liberal Elite Establishment and all their Liberal RINO and DEM Puppets. I am a strong advocate of Draining the Swamp and will be looking for you as you swirl around the drain. Get out tomorrow with your horny hat on and join the parade.

          8. DrBillLemoine says:

            Of course I am hoping my position is the accurate one. Every American hopes that they are not being illegally hacked as Russia did to influence the 2016 election. But it’s not wealthy or liberal or elite or establishment people that can be swayed easily by faux news, something that your Trump, Bannon, Flynn and Trump family members swallow hook, line and sinker. They are wittingly or unwittingly agents for Putin and his Russian aims today–discredit, diminish and defeat western democracies led by the USA. Your aversion to those groups you list is one step along the way toward Russian autocracy in the States. If you can’t see how the swamp is growing, not draining under Trump, you are gullible and a ‘useful fool’ just like the media labeled Trump for the past year. Better start practicing your Russian, pal.

          9. Ken says says:

            Have a good day PUPPET.

          10. Ken says says:

            Hey Bill – what is your response to the Wiki Leaks exposure of the CIA and Worldwide covert action with regard to “information gathering” of the Governments and Citizens – including everyone in the USA? They have taken over where NSA was only “small potatoes” AND they do it with no accountability and with OUR TAX DOLLARS.

          11. DrBillLemoine says:

            All modern governments hack others–no biggie. It’s called national security. Abroad no constitutional limits apply ex American citizens. It’s OK. When you say ‘including everyone in the USA’, you are ignoring our prohibitions in law and constitution that require court warrants. Anything else is illegal like Snowden, the traitor. NSA was bigger potatoes before when it collected metadata, now forbidden. Nonetheless our intel agencies are not second bananas to any other nation in capability. That’s what we have government for and they are always accountable as indicated in America by FISA warrants or ordinary warrants for FBI–both strong accountability, unlike your fear. BTW there’s a price for national security–are you too cheap to pay it?

          12. Ken says says:

            Hey Bill – you really are one of the best Soros/Clinton Trolls I’ve run across – I sure hope the Elite Establishment is paying you well – you’re worth it .

          13. DrBillLemoine says:

            Do you know the standard disclaimer in books and cinema that I’ll paraphrase as any resemblance between my thoughts and official ‘elite establishment’ policy is coincidental, but to be expected from straight thinking. Millions of people agree with me, just not many on this blog site.

          14. Ken says says:

            We already know – the hands out/palms up folks living off the system – aka known as the working and paying taxes folks. Not a good job of picking friends, associates and groups to support.Enjoy your life (until the Swamp is Drained)

          15. DrBillLemoine says:

            I know sometimes it seems like ordinary Americans are constantly getting the shaft. I recall Republicans nixing extending unemployment insurance for those laid off in the Great Recession, those who companies (ordinarily strongly supported by the political right voter) refuse to retrain workers only to fire them. I remember the softener for ACA being extra money to the states for Medicaid funds used by red state governors to balance budgets when revenues dropped in 2008-9. I remember Democrats trying hard to avoid sequestration that cut Pentagon funding only to fall to Republican senators in the gang of eight refusing to compromise. I remember Minority Leader McConnell saying he opposed everything in 2009-10 to make Obama a ‘one-term president’. Those are the symptoms of conservatives acting on behalf of conservative taxpayers, fat cats, a universal mandate (or penalty) for joining Obamacare to keep premiums down when they backed away giving no input at all. I remember Bush era congresses abetting huge corporations relocating in China and the Far East to cut labor expenses in favor of cheaper labor abroad. Yet base Republicans, Tea Party members later and Freedom Caucus members now in and out of congress voting for or campaigning against workers, labor unions and raising minimum wages that showed ‘friendship’ with wealthy Republicans while your ‘working and paying taxes’ folks were thrown into the streets, off their jobs and their companies (verbally) allowed to enter bankruptcy. If base Republicans would think a minute, they’d find common cause with Democrats to expand more jobs from emerging technologies, artificial intelligence and automation, solar and wind power, and the like. Problem–all need retraining for employment, supported not by needy Republicans but by Democrats. You are lobbying against the very people and party who would provide you with jobs, free education, higher wages and more rights. That’s the dream of lots of us on the left but matches dreams of your right wing workers–yet you would drain the swamp and foster more policies and people working against your needs. Go figure.

    2. Rodney Steward says:

      You’re the reason why teachers like you need to be cleaned out of our school systems and SHOT! The Pathetic brainwashing of our kids!!

    3. Webb says:

      The Corrupt DNC got exposed…
      Bernie got screwed by his step – party and Democrat Cronies…
      Hillary Lost…Progressives have been exposed for the hypocrisy they represent…
      The next eight years will be all Trump…

      1. DrBillLemoine says:

        Forgetting one little detail–Hillary and the Dems won the popular vote handily. With pressure to fix election district gerrymandering that favors Rs the DNC and state/local races should improve quickly with Trump in office and a congress in disarray.

        1. NM Leon says:

          Are you actually as ignorant as you portray or is it an act?

          The New Orleans handily got more yards than any other team in the NFL and yet they won only 7 of 16 games. Atlanta had more points than any other team but lost the SuperBowl. Neither most popular votes, most yardage, or most points gets you across the finish line first. Deal with it.

          Gerrymandering has been going on in the US since before our founding.

          Partisan gerrymandering, which refers to redistricting that favors one political party, has a long tradition in the United States that precedes the 1789 election of the First U.S. Congress. In 1788, Patrick Henry and his Anti-Federalist allies were in control of the Virginia House of Delegates. They drew the boundaries of Virginia’s 5th congressional district in an unsuccessful attempt to keep James Madison out of the U.S. House of Representatives. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerrymandering_in_the_United_States

          Of course redistricting favors whichever party has power in each state. For years that was the Dems, now it’s the Reps, but it has squat to do with a president.

          Redistricting is the process of drawing electoral district boundaries in the United States.

          In 32 states, the state legislature has primary responsibility for creating a redistricting plan, in many cases subject to approval by the state governor. To reduce the role that legislative politics might play, seven states (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, New Jersey and Washington) determine congressional redistricting by an independent or bipartisan redistricting commission.[1] Four states, Florida, Iowa, Maine, and New York give independent bodies authority to propose redistricting plans, but preserve the role of legislatures to approve them. Seven states have only a single representative for the entire state because of their low populations; these are Alaska, Delaware, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont and Wyoming. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redistricting

    4. NM Leon says:

      Do a google search of “James Rosen, wiretap”.

      Your idiocy is getting worse there BB, You should visit your doctor. They have some meds for that now.

      McCarthyism is the practice of making accusations of subversion or treason without proper regard for evidence.[1] It also means “the practice of making unfair allegations or using unfair investigative techniques, especially in order to restrict dissent or political criticism.”[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCarthyism

      Must be really sad for you to find out that you are not as intelligent as Trump, right?

    5. ezekiel22 says:

      I have been trying my damnedest to not backhand the left leaning fascists in this country. They are hardly paragons of virtue or honesty. However they do seem to have a penchant for assaulting women, older people and those with disabilities.
      I expect from you, in order to honor your claim to be a christian, to be honest on both sides of the issues. You see I find it disconcerting when every democrat tries to pin Russian collusion on Trump. They have ignored Schemer and his multiple dealings with the Russians, Pelosi forgets that she had dinner with the Russians, and let us not forget that the Russian Ambassador was sitting with the democrats during the joint session speech by Trump to Congress. Yes, there is a picture I posted on the net with him next to the democratic senator from Nevada Masto.
      Schumer is just as crooked as any seen yet in Congress. Did you know that he has taken more than 1.5 million dollars from the likes of Goldman Sachs and yet he cries about them? Stupid.
      You have Loretta Lynch basically calling for more riots in the streets. I suppose you seen that video. You would think she would call for calm but no she wants blood. As long as it is not her own.
      Congrats on your new DNC chair. The race you guys had was telling indeed. Perez as you probably know is a figurehead put there to try to keep too many people from leaving. The real power lies in Elison.

      1. DrBillLemoine says:

        Typically you aren’t clear–a label of ‘fascism’ for the left is laughable given Trump rallies advocating violence (even hacking), illegal “Muslim bans” still extant as 2.0 revisions (not), tantrums on twitter about Obama hacking that never happened, false news and spin from every WH spokesperson/aide and more. It’s simply your open attempt to equate the proven authoritarian right with ordinary leaders on the left–false equivalencies.
        I’m always honest, not due to Christian dogma but personal aims and history. Ordinary senator talks with Ruskie ambassadors are frequent. Concealed and lied about Trump company interactions have produced much smoke–and your false equivalences. Talk about truth–you don’t know it and accept lies readily. More shoes on Trump connections with Russia have yet to fall. We may yet get his tax returns with proof, the beginning of the end leading to impeachment and resignation. Know of any pool betting on the exit date?
        Donors unbeknownst to you frequently give to both parties. No biggie.
        Nobody is calling for riots–more lies from you. Democracy requires marches sometimes. We have much buyers’ remorse lately with Trump you overlook.
        I favored Tom Buttigieg from Indianapolis for DNC Chair as more in tune with base Republicans than Perez or Ellison who mostly represent Latinos and Blacks/Muslims, groups rejected by Trump voters. We’ll see more with April elections pitting Ds against Rs in marginal districts. Keep it honest is advice you should take from your own advice.

        1. NM Leon says:

          A label of Fascism for the left is and always has been accurate.

          Point out to us where Trump advocated hacking.

          His travel bans are completely legal.

          The FBI Deputy Director told Reince Priebus that the Dem’s narrative about the Trump campain staff colluding with Russia was bullschitte. That means the FBI had investigated it. If the FBI had investigated it and the Trump campaign headquarters were in Trump tower, then they must have had electronic surveillance (“wiretapping”) there.

          You are never honest about anything. I have exposed your lies here times too numerous to repeat.

          Pool betting on Trump impeachment? Tell you what BB, get yourself a bitcoin wallet and I’ll bet up to 100 bitcoins that Trump is NEVER impeached. Put up or shut up BB.

        2. ezekiel22 says:

          Sorry it took so long to get back to you but honestly your answers were exactly what I expected, unfortunately. Whether you believe me or not is your choice. Ignoring what is going on in front of you is also your choice and understandable. It counters an assumption that you prefer to believe.
          I can fill your in box with all sorts of reports of leftist brownshirts attacking people. That is too easy. Earlier this week a professor was attacked on stage and on the way to a car with another professor who was hospitalized. That is what the left is pulling now days. Free speech as long as it is the allowed free speech. Check it out. There is a glimmer of good news though. A couple of professors are doing something. One is circulating a petition and the other is releasing a book explains the difference between rural thinking and “city” thinking. He too is a professor at Sanford. You can check out the archive on the Tucker Carlson Tonight show.
          The wiretapping allegations it seems are true if not probable. I guess the first easiest inkling that it might be true is the tapping of Gen. Flynn. You want to guess where those conversations took place. Second thing is that the ability to tap everyone in this country is a fact as it is done everyday. It is the sifting that usually needs a judge except in one instance. It seems POTUS can directly order a tap without a judge. Yes, that is in the FISA regs. It also seems that there was another entity that was working on that too. BTW check out Lou Hobbs Tonight too as he goes in depth with references. You won’t like this but the CIA has a program called UMBRAGE that mimics the Russians on hacking including leaving the footprint. How convenient. The interesting note is that this was confirmed months ago by the founder of Norton AntiVirus on the Larry King Show.
          Whether you do any checking or not is your choice. I gave you references that you can easily check. Yes, Loretta Lynch and Killary are both encouraging people to fight in those words and according to Lynch even if some die. Those are facts that you can see for yourself. Do something don’t do something that is your choice. Check it out or not your choice. The truth is there for you to see or ignore.

          1. DrBillLemoine says:

            Once again you fail to distinguish between the progressives who demonstrate/march peacefully and a criminal element who are ever ready to take advantage of public demonstrations for their own aims. It’s a right wing problem including ignoring word meanings, twitter effects, misunderstanding the printed/aired items in media. That’s what’s going on in front of you. No doubt there are radicals on both extremes but you lump them all together as ‘brownshirts’. That’s too bad.
            We’ve always had a rural/city difference in the nation. With the vast majority of people living in cities today we must be ever vigilant that gerrymandering doesn’t continue to tilt the electoral process toward rural sparse populations. A popular vote amendment replacing the Electoral College would suffice.
            Then you confuse wiretapping Gen. Flynn with his being swept up in the quite necessary and ongoing eavesdropping on enemy agents and politicians who Flynn talked to–totally aside from his unnatural favoritism of Russians and Putin. He got his comeuppance as an independent prosecutor will discover when appointed to build a case against Trump and his concealed ties to Russian kleptocrats, the folks who bailed him our and keep him in clover, even while running this country. Yes, every decent American should urge all parties to fight against yielding American hegemony and power to a small Eurasian enemy. Putin is hard at it to take over Western Europe, something you might read about in Nigel Hamilton’s ‘Commander-in-Chief’ exposure of FDR as a clear-eyed director of WW2 strategy. Putin is simply the extension today of Stalin then.

          2. ezekiel22 says:

            No didn’t confuse anything.
            As far as replacing the Electoral College that is completely unwise any way you look at it. Please go back and research the arguments for establishing that system in the first place. If you look at the fact that only 57 counties were carried by hiilary out of nearly 3200 counties in this country. The elimination of the Electoral college would most assuredly lead to a bicoastal tyranny. That would split this country up rather than keep it united. Like I said research. I used to think like you do on this until I did.

            I would like to point something out for you. On the day that CNN and other MSM outlets were having vapors about Kellyanne Conway on the couch in the Oval Office do you know what else was going on? Probably not. Check it out. Trump signed an EO giving Historically Black College Fund 50 billion dollars as opposed to obama who cut them down to 5 billion dollars. She was trying to angle for a good picture in a cramped space. Office was full. Whether you like it or not Trump has done a lot of good for a lot of people without the fanfare. Little things like paying the mortgage of a guy who helped him on the freeway years ago, using his personal jet to fly a medically sensitive child that others refused to medical treatments, he has a definite soft spot for the military, he also has been housing a homeless lady and feeding her at Trump Towers in New York City for the past 9 years. There are many other things he has done without the fanfare and before he even thought of being president. He never brings it up. He also has some very good children that are accomplished and busy working with those that need help. Maybe you could check out where they stand. The MSM won’t bring these things up without a gun to their head.

            I am also trying to figure out why the Alt. Right and Alt. Left are doing working together. On the surface they fight and sometimes bloodily. They don’t have any common goals supposedly. My guess is manipulation for their personal gain. Funny huh?

          3. DrBillLemoine says:

            It’s a tired old argument dating from colonial times, Electoral College. If the population prefers the coasts, that’s where the voting should be weighted in one-man, one vote. It’s reasonable. Colonial arguments are not extant today. 3/5th blacks voting; populous states in the north outweighing agrarian southern ‘colonies’. Elitists voting at state capitols, not citizens. Etc. We’re a long way from those valid arguments 200+ years ago, not germane today.
            Republican gerrymandering after 2010’s Tea Party surge isolated Dems in few urban centers while sparse rural Republicans get too much power. It’s sociological, not political, the reasons why people want to live in cities, not your fantasy and antebellum ideas to maintain more power than you should. I know the research, but live today, not in 1789.
            Not living on the East Coast, or New York, you wouldn’t know that your anecdotes are all trumped up publicity for Trump the tabloids and media maven. A few good stories don’t outweigh the bad he is doing every day in office. He’s got your conned.
            I like the success of his children too. But understand you could do as well with a millionaire or billionaire father. It’s not surprising. But Trump is misusing his kids illegally in office; only Republicans in their thrill to have the presidency again, don’t care it’s unlawful use, including apparently you.
            BTW there’s no alt left, a fiction Rs invent to counter the bad being done by Breitbart, Trump, Manafort, Flynn, Sessions, Price, Ross, DeVos and the other swamp monsters. You can’t cite anything ‘alt left’.

    6. NM Leon says:

      Are you ever correct about ANYTHING BB.?

      McCarthyism is the practice of making accusations of subversion or treason without proper regard for evidence.[1] It also means “the practice of making unfair allegations or using unfair investigative techniques, especially in order to restrict dissent or political criticism.”[2]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCarthyism

      A FISA warrant is issued by one of the 11 FISA Judges who sit on a rotating basis.

      All FISA judges are appointed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, not the president, and the longest sitting judge on the current court, Martin Feldman, wasn’t appointed until 2010.

      There certainly is rogue listening in the sense that warrants are issued for just about anything. Did you miss the news about Snowden/NSA or James Rosen (and parents) or the AP? Of the 35,434 warrants requested from 1979 to 2013 exactly 12 were denied.

      For someone who claims to have received a doctorate you are a terrible researcher.

  • jimahrens says:

    Obama did not do it, But he dam well ordered it done. Demorats think were stupid. Let’s see who gets the last laugh!

  • Ken says says:

    exKing Bo assumed the power of the Clinton Crime Family and has for 7 years considered himself above the law – ANY LAW including the US Constitution. When will Barry and Mikey’s records be unsealed or will the girls on the SSCOTUS block that?

  • Webb says:

    My hope is that President Trump has Hard evidence on his claims…
    Hopefully court records will show up…the actions of Holders DOJ shows its possible!
    The FBI has got to let America know what they have on the tapped phones and Russia…
    ☆★☆

  • Tiger says:

    Just heard on the news, Trump has ordered a serious investigation into the Obama administration and any interference or abuse of power while he was still in office related to this election. O’s people said in a tweet they never wire tapped anyone. Boy will they eat those words. O tapped Rosen of FOX, we already know Flynn was tapped when still a citizen holding no office. We also know O tried to get the courts to grant him a tap on citizens on the Trump Team and was denied. We also know that O before leaving office wrote an EO to let NSA give information to 16 other agencies. These leaks are coming from O’s people plain and simple.

    Trump said there will be no more communication from the WH on this issue until the investigation is over and all facts in. Just like the libs screwed their thumbs to the wall with the cry for Trump to back-up his election fraud comment, and he is doing it they just lit the funeral fire that will burn them out of office for the next 20 years.

    1. Mike N says:

      Be interesting to see how this plays out. Unlike most spineless Republicans Trump will take action.

      1. Tiger says:

        Indeed he will. We already have many goods on O. A true investigation is going to pull the bottom feeders out.

        1. pappy450 says:

          Tiger,
          You can bet there is a LOT of “records” being destroyed and documents being shredded as we speak to “protect” the usurper rmuslime scumbag in chief and his minions from the last administration.

          1. Tiger says:

            Oh yes indeed but for every record destroyed there are many backed up and they will be found.

          2. pappy450 says:

            We can only hope. I, for one am extremely tired of all this underhanded BS from the scumocrat/rinos that are doing everything possible to undermine PRESIDENT TRUMP’S agenda. ALL because their visions of a “New World order” and “One World Government” is being STOPPED by the TRUMP administration.

          3. Askjrsk says:

            Et tu! OBAMAGATE is Huge. Lock them up.

          4. Tiger says:

            You are about the 50th Trump supporter, counting myself who have said that today. Seems to be in the air.

            I’d bet a good lawyer could make a great case out
            of the fact that President Obama was tapping my phones in October, just
            prior to Election!

            — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 4, 2017

            How low has President Obama gone to tapp my
            phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate.
            Bad (or sick) guy!

            — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 4, 2017

            Radio host Mark Levin laid out on his show a timeline of events pertaining to the Obama administration’s surveillance of Trump. From Breitbart:

            1. June 2016: FISA request. The Obama administration files a request with
            the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) to monitor
            communications involving Donald Trump and several advisers. The request,
            uncharacteristically, is denied.

            2. July: Russia joke. Wikileaks releases emails
            from the Democratic National Committee that show an effort to prevent
            Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) from winning the presidential nomination. In a
            press conference, Donald Trump refers to Hillary Clinton’s own missing
            emails, joking:
            “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000
            e-mails that are missing.” That remark becomes the basis for accusations
            by Clinton and the media that Trump invited further hacking.

            3. October: Podesta emails. In October, Wikileaks releases the
            emails of Clinton campaign chair John Podesta, rolling out batches
            every day until the election, creating new mini-scandals. The Clinton
            campaign blames Trump and the Russians.

            4. October: FISA request. The Obama
            administration submits a new, narrow request to the FISA court, now
            focused on a computer server in Trump Tower suspected of links to
            Russian banks. No evidence is found — but the wiretaps continue,
            ostensibly for national security reasons, Andrew McCarthy at National
            Review later notes. The
            Obama administration is now monitoring an opposing presidential
            campaign using the high-tech surveillance powers of the federal
            intelligence services.

            5. January 2017: Buzzfeed/CNN dossier. Buzzfeed releases, and CNN reports, a supposed intelligence “dossier”
            compiled by a foreign former spy. It purports to show continuous
            contact between Russia and the Trump campaign, and says that the
            Russians have compromising information about Trump. None of the
            allegations can be verified and some are proven false. Several media
            outlets claim that they had been aware of the dossier for months and
            that it had been circulating in Washington.

            6. January: Obama expands NSA sharing. As Michael Walsh later notes,
            and as the New York Times reports, the outgoing Obama
            administration “expanded the power of the National Security Agency to
            share globally intercepted personal communications with the government’s
            16 other intelligence agencies before applying privacy
            protections.” The new powers, and reduced protections, could make it
            easier for intelligence on private citizens to be circulated improperly
            or leaked.

            7. January: Times report. The New York Times reports,
            on the eve of Inauguration Day, that several agencies — the Federal
            Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA),
            the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Treasury Department are
            monitoring several associates of the Trump campaign suspected of Russian
            ties. Other news outlets also report the exisentence of “a multiagency
            working group to coordinate investigations across the government,”
            though it is unclear how they found out, since the investigations would
            have been secret and involved classified information.

            8. February: Mike Flynn scandal. Reports emerge
            that the FBI intercepted a conversation in 2016 between future National
            Security Adviser Michael Flynn — then a private citizen — and Russian
            Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. The intercept supposedly was part of routine
            spying on the ambassador, not monitoring of the Trump campaign. The FBI
            transcripts reportedly show the two discussing Obama’s newly-imposed
            sanctions on Russia, though Flynn earlier denied discussing them. Sally
            Yates, whom Trump would later fire as acting Attorney General for
            insubordination, is involved in the investigation. In the end, Flynn
            resigns over having misled Vice President Mike Pence (perhaps
            inadvertently) about the content of the conversation.

            9. February: Times claims extensive Russian contacts. The New York Times cites “four
            current and former American officials” in reporting that the Trump
            campaign had “repeated contacts with senior Russian intelligence
            officials.” The Trump campaign denies the claims — and the Times admits
            that there is “no evidence” of coordination between the campaign and the
            Russians. The White House and some congressional Republicans begin to
            raise questions about illegal intelligence leaks.

            10. March: the Washington Post targets Jeff Sessions. The Washington Post reports that
            Attorney General Jeff Sessions had contact twice with the Russian
            ambassador during the campaign — once at a Heritage Foundation event and
            once at a meeting in Sessions’s Senate office. The Post suggests that
            the two meetings contradict Sessions’s testimony at his confirmation
            hearings that he had no contacts with the Russians, though in context
            (not presented by the Post) it was clear he meant in his capacity as a
            campaign surrogate, and that he was responding to claims in the
            “dossier” of ongoing contacts. The New York Times, in covering the
            story, adds that the Obama White House “rushed to preserve”
            intelligence related to alleged Russian links with the Trump
            campaign. By “preserve” it really means “disseminate”: officials spread
            evidence throughout other government agencies “to leave a clear trail of
            intelligence for government investigators” and perhaps the media as
            well.

            Democrats want every member of Trump’s cabinet and Trump himself
            investigated for these ‘connections,’ even though there isn’t any
            probable cause that anything illegal had been done. All they have is
            conjecture and wishful thinking.

        2. Jeanne Stotler says:

          There will be much knashing of teeth in DC when all comes to light, this is much bigger than many of us can even imangine, time for open politics, as said in preamble, it’s “WE THE PEOPLE” and we need to know what is really going on in Dem. party

          1. Tiger says:

            Going to be the biggest exposure in the history of our country.

          2. maxx says:

            You probably heard this from me before, but back in 2004, before Obama was really in the public arena and I knew nothing about him, when I started to research the guy I was shocked about how much information there was on the internet about him and it was all very suspicious and negative in my view. There were so many red flags waving that I knew he was not going to be good for America and he had not yet said he was running for a higher office. I did my best to spread the word but I can only say for sure that because of what I discovered I could never ever support the traitor.

          3. Tiger says:

            Maxx you and I did the same thing, came to the same conclusion but our day may come soon via Trump he is going to get this bottom feeder and all the scuzzie fungus among us.

            I’d bet a good lawyer could make a great case out
            of the fact that President Obama was tapping my phones in October, just
            prior to Election!

            — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 4, 2017

            How low has President Obama gone to tapp my
            phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate.
            Bad (or sick) guy!

            — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 4, 2017

            Radio host Mark Levin laid out on his show a timeline of events pertaining to the Obama administration’s surveillance of Trump. From Breitbart:

            1. June 2016: FISA request. The Obama administration files a request with
            the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) to monitor
            communications involving Donald Trump and several advisers. The request,
            uncharacteristically, is denied.

            2. July: Russia joke. Wikileaks releases emails
            from the Democratic National Committee that show an effort to prevent
            Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) from winning the presidential nomination. In a
            press conference, Donald Trump refers to Hillary Clinton’s own missing
            emails, joking:
            “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000
            e-mails that are missing.” That remark becomes the basis for accusations
            by Clinton and the media that Trump invited further hacking.

            3. October: Podesta emails. In October, Wikileaks releases the
            emails of Clinton campaign chair John Podesta, rolling out batches
            every day until the election, creating new mini-scandals. The Clinton
            campaign blames Trump and the Russians.

            4. October: FISA request. The Obama
            administration submits a new, narrow request to the FISA court, now
            focused on a computer server in Trump Tower suspected of links to
            Russian banks. No evidence is found — but the wiretaps continue,
            ostensibly for national security reasons, Andrew McCarthy at National
            Review later notes. The
            Obama administration is now monitoring an opposing presidential
            campaign using the high-tech surveillance powers of the federal
            intelligence services.

            5. January 2017: Buzzfeed/CNN dossier. Buzzfeed releases, and CNN reports, a supposed intelligence “dossier”
            compiled by a foreign former spy. It purports to show continuous
            contact between Russia and the Trump campaign, and says that the
            Russians have compromising information about Trump. None of the
            allegations can be verified and some are proven false. Several media
            outlets claim that they had been aware of the dossier for months and
            that it had been circulating in Washington.

            6. January: Obama expands NSA sharing. As Michael Walsh later notes,
            and as the New York Times reports, the outgoing Obama
            administration “expanded the power of the National Security Agency to
            share globally intercepted personal communications with the government’s
            16 other intelligence agencies before applying privacy
            protections.” The new powers, and reduced protections, could make it
            easier for intelligence on private citizens to be circulated improperly
            or leaked.

            7. January: Times report. The New York Times reports,
            on the eve of Inauguration Day, that several agencies — the Federal
            Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA),
            the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Treasury Department are
            monitoring several associates of the Trump campaign suspected of Russian
            ties. Other news outlets also report the exisentence of “a multiagency
            working group to coordinate investigations across the government,”
            though it is unclear how they found out, since the investigations would
            have been secret and involved classified information.

            8. February: Mike Flynn scandal. Reports emerge
            that the FBI intercepted a conversation in 2016 between future National
            Security Adviser Michael Flynn — then a private citizen — and Russian
            Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. The intercept supposedly was part of routine
            spying on the ambassador, not monitoring of the Trump campaign. The FBI
            transcripts reportedly show the two discussing Obama’s newly-imposed
            sanctions on Russia, though Flynn earlier denied discussing them. Sally
            Yates, whom Trump would later fire as acting Attorney General for
            insubordination, is involved in the investigation. In the end, Flynn
            resigns over having misled Vice President Mike Pence (perhaps
            inadvertently) about the content of the conversation.

            9. February: Times claims extensive Russian contacts. The New York Times cites “four
            current and former American officials” in reporting that the Trump
            campaign had “repeated contacts with senior Russian intelligence
            officials.” The Trump campaign denies the claims — and the Times admits
            that there is “no evidence” of coordination between the campaign and the
            Russians. The White House and some congressional Republicans begin to
            raise questions about illegal intelligence leaks.

            10. March: the Washington Post targets Jeff Sessions. The Washington Post reports that
            Attorney General Jeff Sessions had contact twice with the Russian
            ambassador during the campaign — once at a Heritage Foundation event and
            once at a meeting in Sessions’s Senate office. The Post suggests that
            the two meetings contradict Sessions’s testimony at his confirmation
            hearings that he had no contacts with the Russians, though in context
            (not presented by the Post) it was clear he meant in his capacity as a
            campaign surrogate, and that he was responding to claims in the
            “dossier” of ongoing contacts. The New York Times, in covering the
            story, adds that the Obama White House “rushed to preserve”
            intelligence related to alleged Russian links with the Trump
            campaign. By “preserve” it really means “disseminate”: officials spread
            evidence throughout other government agencies “to leave a clear trail of
            intelligence for government investigators” and perhaps the media as
            well.

            Democrats want every member of Trump’s cabinet and Trump himself
            investigated for these ‘connections,’ even though there isn’t any
            probable cause that anything illegal had been done. All they have is
            conjecture and wishful thinking.

          4. Askjrsk says:

            Nothing ever as big as OBAMAGATE! Watergate child’s play in comparison.

          5. Tiger says:

            For sure.

            I’d bet a good lawyer could make a great case out
            of the fact that President Obama was tapping my phones in October, just
            prior to Election!

            — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 4, 2017

            How low has President Obama gone to tapp my
            phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate.
            Bad (or sick) guy!

            — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 4, 2017

            Radio host Mark Levin laid out on his show a timeline of events pertaining to the Obama administration’s surveillance of Trump. From Breitbart:

            1. June 2016: FISA request. The Obama administration files a request with
            the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) to monitor
            communications involving Donald Trump and several advisers. The request,
            uncharacteristically, is denied.

            2. July: Russia joke. Wikileaks releases emails
            from the Democratic National Committee that show an effort to prevent
            Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) from winning the presidential nomination. In a
            press conference, Donald Trump refers to Hillary Clinton’s own missing
            emails, joking:
            “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000
            e-mails that are missing.” That remark becomes the basis for accusations
            by Clinton and the media that Trump invited further hacking.

            3. October: Podesta emails. In October, Wikileaks releases the
            emails of Clinton campaign chair John Podesta, rolling out batches
            every day until the election, creating new mini-scandals. The Clinton
            campaign blames Trump and the Russians.

            4. October: FISA request. The Obama
            administration submits a new, narrow request to the FISA court, now
            focused on a computer server in Trump Tower suspected of links to
            Russian banks. No evidence is found — but the wiretaps continue,
            ostensibly for national security reasons, Andrew McCarthy at National
            Review later notes. The
            Obama administration is now monitoring an opposing presidential
            campaign using the high-tech surveillance powers of the federal
            intelligence services.

            5. January 2017: Buzzfeed/CNN dossier. Buzzfeed releases, and CNN reports, a supposed intelligence “dossier”
            compiled by a foreign former spy. It purports to show continuous
            contact between Russia and the Trump campaign, and says that the
            Russians have compromising information about Trump. None of the
            allegations can be verified and some are proven false. Several media
            outlets claim that they had been aware of the dossier for months and
            that it had been circulating in Washington.

            6. January: Obama expands NSA sharing. As Michael Walsh later notes,
            and as the New York Times reports, the outgoing Obama
            administration “expanded the power of the National Security Agency to
            share globally intercepted personal communications with the government’s
            16 other intelligence agencies before applying privacy
            protections.” The new powers, and reduced protections, could make it
            easier for intelligence on private citizens to be circulated improperly
            or leaked.

            7. January: Times report. The New York Times reports,
            on the eve of Inauguration Day, that several agencies — the Federal
            Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA),
            the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Treasury Department are
            monitoring several associates of the Trump campaign suspected of Russian
            ties. Other news outlets also report the exisentence of “a multiagency
            working group to coordinate investigations across the government,”
            though it is unclear how they found out, since the investigations would
            have been secret and involved classified information.

            8. February: Mike Flynn scandal. Reports emerge
            that the FBI intercepted a conversation in 2016 between future National
            Security Adviser Michael Flynn — then a private citizen — and Russian
            Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. The intercept supposedly was part of routine
            spying on the ambassador, not monitoring of the Trump campaign. The FBI
            transcripts reportedly show the two discussing Obama’s newly-imposed
            sanctions on Russia, though Flynn earlier denied discussing them. Sally
            Yates, whom Trump would later fire as acting Attorney General for
            insubordination, is involved in the investigation. In the end, Flynn
            resigns over having misled Vice President Mike Pence (perhaps
            inadvertently) about the content of the conversation.

            9. February: Times claims extensive Russian contacts. The New York Times cites “four
            current and former American officials” in reporting that the Trump
            campaign had “repeated contacts with senior Russian intelligence
            officials.” The Trump campaign denies the claims — and the Times admits
            that there is “no evidence” of coordination between the campaign and the
            Russians. The White House and some congressional Republicans begin to
            raise questions about illegal intelligence leaks.

            10. March: the Washington Post targets Jeff Sessions. The Washington Post reports that
            Attorney General Jeff Sessions had contact twice with the Russian
            ambassador during the campaign — once at a Heritage Foundation event and
            once at a meeting in Sessions’s Senate office. The Post suggests that
            the two meetings contradict Sessions’s testimony at his confirmation
            hearings that he had no contacts with the Russians, though in context
            (not presented by the Post) it was clear he meant in his capacity as a
            campaign surrogate, and that he was responding to claims in the
            “dossier” of ongoing contacts. The New York Times, in covering the
            story, adds that the Obama White House “rushed to preserve”
            intelligence related to alleged Russian links with the Trump
            campaign. By “preserve” it really means “disseminate”: officials spread
            evidence throughout other government agencies “to leave a clear trail of
            intelligence for government investigators” and perhaps the media as
            well.

            Democrats want every member of Trump’s cabinet and Trump himself
            investigated for these ‘connections,’ even though there isn’t any
            probable cause that anything illegal had been done. All they have is
            conjecture and wishful thinking.

        3. maxx says:

          I would like to see Trump use his presidential authority to “unlock” all the records and documents related to Obozzo that he spent the last 8 plus years hiding from the public. The time has come to open up everything, good or bad.

          1. pappy450 says:

            Excellent idea, BUT you will never see it, because he is too well protected by the DNC and a GAGGLE of high-paid Lawyers. IF he was “outed” and his “secret” exposed there would be MANY scumocrats/rinos that would go “down” with him. (you wouldn’t expect him to go down “alone’ now would you?) Of course that idea might be the best thing that has happened to this country in YEARS!

          2. Tiger says:

            Wouldn’t we all but that won’t happen, Trump can’t do that, they are legally handled and locked away and his lawyers attempted to have them locked for life. Someone might yet get to them, once O goes down, neutralized along with his gang of lawless dirtbags, who knows.

        4. Askjrsk says:

          Hang them for OBAMAGATE!

          1. Retired says:

            That could be a mile long hanging , new world record .

          2. Askjrsk says:

            Obama always sets world records. Look at OBAMAGATE!!!

          3. Tiger says:

            O is surely not as smart as people thought, either that or he is Caligula and Nero mixed into one. Perhaps he honestly thought he had most of America behind him and could pull this Coup off.

            I’d bet a good lawyer could make a great case out
            of the fact that President Obama was tapping my phones in October, just
            prior to Election!

            — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 4, 2017

            How low has President Obama gone to tapp my
            phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate.
            Bad (or sick) guy!

            — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 4, 2017

            Radio host Mark Levin laid out on his show a timeline of events pertaining to the Obama administration’s surveillance of Trump. From Breitbart:

            1. June 2016: FISA request. The Obama administration files a request with
            the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) to monitor
            communications involving Donald Trump and several advisers. The request,
            uncharacteristically, is denied.

            2. July: Russia joke. Wikileaks releases emails
            from the Democratic National Committee that show an effort to prevent
            Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) from winning the presidential nomination. In a
            press conference, Donald Trump refers to Hillary Clinton’s own missing
            emails, joking:
            “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000
            e-mails that are missing.” That remark becomes the basis for accusations
            by Clinton and the media that Trump invited further hacking.

            3. October: Podesta emails. In October, Wikileaks releases the
            emails of Clinton campaign chair John Podesta, rolling out batches
            every day until the election, creating new mini-scandals. The Clinton
            campaign blames Trump and the Russians.

            4. October: FISA request. The Obama
            administration submits a new, narrow request to the FISA court, now
            focused on a computer server in Trump Tower suspected of links to
            Russian banks. No evidence is found — but the wiretaps continue,
            ostensibly for national security reasons, Andrew McCarthy at National
            Review later notes. The
            Obama administration is now monitoring an opposing presidential
            campaign using the high-tech surveillance powers of the federal
            intelligence services.

            5. January 2017: Buzzfeed/CNN dossier. Buzzfeed releases, and CNN reports, a supposed intelligence “dossier”
            compiled by a foreign former spy. It purports to show continuous
            contact between Russia and the Trump campaign, and says that the
            Russians have compromising information about Trump. None of the
            allegations can be verified and some are proven false. Several media
            outlets claim that they had been aware of the dossier for months and
            that it had been circulating in Washington.

            6. January: Obama expands NSA sharing. As Michael Walsh later notes,
            and as the New York Times reports, the outgoing Obama
            administration “expanded the power of the National Security Agency to
            share globally intercepted personal communications with the government’s
            16 other intelligence agencies before applying privacy
            protections.” The new powers, and reduced protections, could make it
            easier for intelligence on private citizens to be circulated improperly
            or leaked.

            7. January: Times report. The New York Times reports,
            on the eve of Inauguration Day, that several agencies — the Federal
            Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA),
            the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Treasury Department are
            monitoring several associates of the Trump campaign suspected of Russian
            ties. Other news outlets also report the exisentence of “a multiagency
            working group to coordinate investigations across the government,”
            though it is unclear how they found out, since the investigations would
            have been secret and involved classified information.

            8. February: Mike Flynn scandal. Reports emerge
            that the FBI intercepted a conversation in 2016 between future National
            Security Adviser Michael Flynn — then a private citizen — and Russian
            Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. The intercept supposedly was part of routine
            spying on the ambassador, not monitoring of the Trump campaign. The FBI
            transcripts reportedly show the two discussing Obama’s newly-imposed
            sanctions on Russia, though Flynn earlier denied discussing them. Sally
            Yates, whom Trump would later fire as acting Attorney General for
            insubordination, is involved in the investigation. In the end, Flynn
            resigns over having misled Vice President Mike Pence (perhaps
            inadvertently) about the content of the conversation.

            9. February: Times claims extensive Russian contacts. The New York Times cites “four
            current and former American officials” in reporting that the Trump
            campaign had “repeated contacts with senior Russian intelligence
            officials.” The Trump campaign denies the claims — and the Times admits
            that there is “no evidence” of coordination between the campaign and the
            Russians. The White House and some congressional Republicans begin to
            raise questions about illegal intelligence leaks.

            10. March: the Washington Post targets Jeff Sessions. The Washington Post reports that
            Attorney General Jeff Sessions had contact twice with the Russian
            ambassador during the campaign — once at a Heritage Foundation event and
            once at a meeting in Sessions’s Senate office. The Post suggests that
            the two meetings contradict Sessions’s testimony at his confirmation
            hearings that he had no contacts with the Russians, though in context
            (not presented by the Post) it was clear he meant in his capacity as a
            campaign surrogate, and that he was responding to claims in the
            “dossier” of ongoing contacts. The New York Times, in covering the
            story, adds that the Obama White House “rushed to preserve”
            intelligence related to alleged Russian links with the Trump
            campaign. By “preserve” it really means “disseminate”: officials spread
            evidence throughout other government agencies “to leave a clear trail of
            intelligence for government investigators” and perhaps the media as
            well.

            Democrats want every member of Trump’s cabinet and Trump himself
            investigated for these ‘connections,’ even though there isn’t any
            probable cause that anything illegal had been done. All they have is
            conjecture and wishful thinking.

      2. Askjrsk says:

        He’s no Richard Nixon leaving town with his tail pulled in behind him. The one coming down OBAMAS and his henchman! OBAMAGATE!

    2. itsfun says:

      Have you seen the case Mark Levin has made against the Obama administration on illegal spying. He is using articles printed by leading newspapers and documents to prove his case. He is basically following the paper trail of actions by the Obama Administration.

      1. Tiger says:

        Yes I have but for millions of us we saw this as it happened and we wondered when this would gather enough steam and enough proof to put them on notice. O will be exposed for what he is and nobody but Trump would have done this. No RINO would have done this.

        We are looking possibly, to the total collapse of the Demonrat party. Everyday I am believing more and more this was in the Almighty’s plan for our country, we prayed by the millions and the one man who could pull this off came out to champion us. All in all the Almighty will take care of these God and Christian hating people and all those dug in to usurp this president.

        How foolish can they be? Trump has the military and all law enforcement behind him. Their thugs already being picked up and jailed. O truly is insane.

        1. Retired says:

          Tiger – Did you ever find anything about the Russian diplomat the was Murdered ??

          1. Tiger says:

            The one murdered in Turkey? Or the one who died recently? I will research if you name which one.

            Obama is going to fry.

            I’d bet a good lawyer could make a great case out
            of the fact that President Obama was tapping my phones in October, just
            prior to Election!

            — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 4, 2017

            How low has President Obama gone to tapp my
            phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate.
            Bad (or sick) guy!

            — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 4, 2017

            Radio host Mark Levin laid out on his show a timeline of events pertaining to the Obama administration’s surveillance of Trump. From Breitbart:

            1. June 2016: FISA request. The Obama administration files a request with
            the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) to monitor
            communications involving Donald Trump and several advisers. The request,
            uncharacteristically, is denied.

            2. July: Russia joke. Wikileaks releases emails
            from the Democratic National Committee that show an effort to prevent
            Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) from winning the presidential nomination. In a
            press conference, Donald Trump refers to Hillary Clinton’s own missing
            emails, joking:
            “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000
            e-mails that are missing.” That remark becomes the basis for accusations
            by Clinton and the media that Trump invited further hacking.

            3. October: Podesta emails. In October, Wikileaks releases the
            emails of Clinton campaign chair John Podesta, rolling out batches
            every day until the election, creating new mini-scandals. The Clinton
            campaign blames Trump and the Russians.

            4. October: FISA request. The Obama
            administration submits a new, narrow request to the FISA court, now
            focused on a computer server in Trump Tower suspected of links to
            Russian banks. No evidence is found — but the wiretaps continue,
            ostensibly for national security reasons, Andrew McCarthy at National
            Review later notes. The
            Obama administration is now monitoring an opposing presidential
            campaign using the high-tech surveillance powers of the federal
            intelligence services.

            5. January 2017: Buzzfeed/CNN dossier. Buzzfeed releases, and CNN reports, a supposed intelligence “dossier”
            compiled by a foreign former spy. It purports to show continuous
            contact between Russia and the Trump campaign, and says that the
            Russians have compromising information about Trump. None of the
            allegations can be verified and some are proven false. Several media
            outlets claim that they had been aware of the dossier for months and
            that it had been circulating in Washington.

            6. January: Obama expands NSA sharing. As Michael Walsh later notes,
            and as the New York Times reports, the outgoing Obama
            administration “expanded the power of the National Security Agency to
            share globally intercepted personal communications with the government’s
            16 other intelligence agencies before applying privacy
            protections.” The new powers, and reduced protections, could make it
            easier for intelligence on private citizens to be circulated improperly
            or leaked.

            7. January: Times report. The New York Times reports,
            on the eve of Inauguration Day, that several agencies — the Federal
            Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA),
            the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Treasury Department are
            monitoring several associates of the Trump campaign suspected of Russian
            ties. Other news outlets also report the exisentence of “a multiagency
            working group to coordinate investigations across the government,”
            though it is unclear how they found out, since the investigations would
            have been secret and involved classified information.

            8. February: Mike Flynn scandal. Reports emerge
            that the FBI intercepted a conversation in 2016 between future National
            Security Adviser Michael Flynn — then a private citizen — and Russian
            Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. The intercept supposedly was part of routine
            spying on the ambassador, not monitoring of the Trump campaign. The FBI
            transcripts reportedly show the two discussing Obama’s newly-imposed
            sanctions on Russia, though Flynn earlier denied discussing them. Sally
            Yates, whom Trump would later fire as acting Attorney General for
            insubordination, is involved in the investigation. In the end, Flynn
            resigns over having misled Vice President Mike Pence (perhaps
            inadvertently) about the content of the conversation.

            9. February: Times claims extensive Russian contacts. The New York Times cites “four
            current and former American officials” in reporting that the Trump
            campaign had “repeated contacts with senior Russian intelligence
            officials.” The Trump campaign denies the claims — and the Times admits
            that there is “no evidence” of coordination between the campaign and the
            Russians. The White House and some congressional Republicans begin to
            raise questions about illegal intelligence leaks.

            10. March: the Washington Post targets Jeff Sessions. The Washington Post reports that
            Attorney General Jeff Sessions had contact twice with the Russian
            ambassador during the campaign — once at a Heritage Foundation event and
            once at a meeting in Sessions’s Senate office. The Post suggests that
            the two meetings contradict Sessions’s testimony at his confirmation
            hearings that he had no contacts with the Russians, though in context
            (not presented by the Post) it was clear he meant in his capacity as a
            campaign surrogate, and that he was responding to claims in the
            “dossier” of ongoing contacts. The New York Times, in covering the
            story, adds that the Obama White House “rushed to preserve”
            intelligence related to alleged Russian links with the Trump
            campaign. By “preserve” it really means “disseminate”: officials spread
            evidence throughout other government agencies “to leave a clear trail of
            intelligence for government investigators” and perhaps the media as
            well.

            Democrats want every member of Trump’s cabinet and Trump himself
            investigated for these ‘connections,’ even though there isn’t any
            probable cause that anything illegal had been done. All they have is
            conjecture and wishful thinking.

          2. Retired says:

            Sorry ,should have been more clear. the recent one.

          3. Tiger says:

            OK hold on.

          4. Tiger says:

            They still don’t know what killed him but this is interesting.

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s35mmdNyRB8

          5. Tiger says:

            Interesting stuff here I am enjoying this.

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4jYGQuEhZ8

          6. Tiger says:

            This is something, listen to the entire thing. Glad you got me started.

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTH0ANncEEU

          7. Tiger says:

            Wow what I have learned. Thank you for getting me on this.

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9t1hqnRVibY

        1. Retired says:

          Is one of those kneeling Mr.O ???

          1. Tiger says:

            You are wishful thinking again my friend but it might as well be when Trump finishes with him.

            As Mark Levin laid out.

            I’d bet a good lawyer could make a great case out
            of the fact that President Obama was tapping my phones in October, just
            prior to Election!

            — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 4, 2017

            How low has President Obama gone to tapp my
            phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate.
            Bad (or sick) guy!

            — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 4, 2017

            Radio host Mark Levin laid out on his show a timeline of events pertaining to the Obama administration’s surveillance of Trump. From Breitbart:

            1. June 2016: FISA request. The Obama administration files a request with
            the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) to monitor
            communications involving Donald Trump and several advisers. The request,
            uncharacteristically, is denied.

            2. July: Russia joke. Wikileaks releases emails
            from the Democratic National Committee that show an effort to prevent
            Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) from winning the presidential nomination. In a
            press conference, Donald Trump refers to Hillary Clinton’s own missing
            emails, joking:
            “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000
            e-mails that are missing.” That remark becomes the basis for accusations
            by Clinton and the media that Trump invited further hacking.

            3. October: Podesta emails. In October, Wikileaks releases the
            emails of Clinton campaign chair John Podesta, rolling out batches
            every day until the election, creating new mini-scandals. The Clinton
            campaign blames Trump and the Russians.

            4. October: FISA request. The Obama
            administration submits a new, narrow request to the FISA court, now
            focused on a computer server in Trump Tower suspected of links to
            Russian banks. No evidence is found — but the wiretaps continue,
            ostensibly for national security reasons, Andrew McCarthy at National
            Review later notes. The
            Obama administration is now monitoring an opposing presidential
            campaign using the high-tech surveillance powers of the federal
            intelligence services.

            5. January 2017: Buzzfeed/CNN dossier. Buzzfeed releases, and CNN reports, a supposed intelligence “dossier”
            compiled by a foreign former spy. It purports to show continuous
            contact between Russia and the Trump campaign, and says that the
            Russians have compromising information about Trump. None of the
            allegations can be verified and some are proven false. Several media
            outlets claim that they had been aware of the dossier for months and
            that it had been circulating in Washington.

            6. January: Obama expands NSA sharing. As Michael Walsh later notes,
            and as the New York Times reports, the outgoing Obama
            administration “expanded the power of the National Security Agency to
            share globally intercepted personal communications with the government’s
            16 other intelligence agencies before applying privacy
            protections.” The new powers, and reduced protections, could make it
            easier for intelligence on private citizens to be circulated improperly
            or leaked.

            7. January: Times report. The New York Times reports,
            on the eve of Inauguration Day, that several agencies — the Federal
            Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA),
            the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Treasury Department are
            monitoring several associates of the Trump campaign suspected of Russian
            ties. Other news outlets also report the exisentence of “a multiagency
            working group to coordinate investigations across the government,”
            though it is unclear how they found out, since the investigations would
            have been secret and involved classified information.

            8. February: Mike Flynn scandal. Reports emerge
            that the FBI intercepted a conversation in 2016 between future National
            Security Adviser Michael Flynn — then a private citizen — and Russian
            Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. The intercept supposedly was part of routine
            spying on the ambassador, not monitoring of the Trump campaign. The FBI
            transcripts reportedly show the two discussing Obama’s newly-imposed
            sanctions on Russia, though Flynn earlier denied discussing them. Sally
            Yates, whom Trump would later fire as acting Attorney General for
            insubordination, is involved in the investigation. In the end, Flynn
            resigns over having misled Vice President Mike Pence (perhaps
            inadvertently) about the content of the conversation.

            9. February: Times claims extensive Russian contacts. The New York Times cites “four
            current and former American officials” in reporting that the Trump
            campaign had “repeated contacts with senior Russian intelligence
            officials.” The Trump campaign denies the claims — and the Times admits
            that there is “no evidence” of coordination between the campaign and the
            Russians. The White House and some congressional Republicans begin to
            raise questions about illegal intelligence leaks.

            10. March: the Washington Post targets Jeff Sessions. The Washington Post reports that
            Attorney General Jeff Sessions had contact twice with the Russian
            ambassador during the campaign — once at a Heritage Foundation event and
            once at a meeting in Sessions’s Senate office. The Post suggests that
            the two meetings contradict Sessions’s testimony at his confirmation
            hearings that he had no contacts with the Russians, though in context
            (not presented by the Post) it was clear he meant in his capacity as a
            campaign surrogate, and that he was responding to claims in the
            “dossier” of ongoing contacts. The New York Times, in covering the
            story, adds that the Obama White House “rushed to preserve”
            intelligence related to alleged Russian links with the Trump
            campaign. By “preserve” it really means “disseminate”: officials spread
            evidence throughout other government agencies “to leave a clear trail of
            intelligence for government investigators” and perhaps the media as
            well.

            Democrats want every member of Trump’s cabinet and Trump himself
            investigated for these ‘connections,’ even though there isn’t any
            probable cause that anything illegal had been done. All they have is
            conjecture and wishful thinking.

    3. Retired says:

      Someone should look into who is paying that $20,000.00 a month rent where O is living .

      1. Tiger says:

        And what Jarrett is doing moving in. This bunch are the scum of the earth.

    4. Askjrsk says:

      Let’s pray they uncover the smoking gun that hangs Obamas for this HUGE OBAMAGATE LOCK OBAMAS UP

      1. Tiger says:

        I think Trump will leave no stones behind but will gather enough to knock some sense into O as the FBI go to his Sanctuary and compound of Trump haters and pulls him out in cuffs. Sedition isn’t a good thing.

        1. Askjrsk says:

          I deep inside know that to be facts and that is how it shall be

          1. Tiger says:

            Me also my friend.

  • Anouk says:

    Nothing should surprise us with this sleazy, slimy Muslim. Obama is worse than a poisonous rattlesnake.

  • John O'gurek says:

    I don’t doubt this story at all! but I ask why isent anyone in cuffs yet???

  • pappy450 says:

    The President wouldn’t just make “accusations” without proof. He MUST have been briefed by someone in the government that “tipped” him off. (a “whistleblower” perhaps) So AGAIN, he goes AROUND the “lame stream media” and takes the information directly to the AMERICAN PEOPLE which ticks off the “Lame stream media” because they can’t “cover up” and “spin” it.

    1. ipsd48 says:

      More likely, he got that info from chief of security at Trump Tower

      1. pappy450 says:

        I just “tweeted” President Trump and told him NOT to “feel alone” “We the People” have been under “surveillance” for quite some time. It has been PROVEN that skype users cameras can be turned on through a “backdoor code” and ALL e-mails are “monitored” by “code words” for years. Even the President of Microsoft stated quite some time ago he himself puts tape over his on board camera when it is not in use. So “wiretapping” Trump Tower isn’t as “farfetched” as the scumocrats are trying to PUSH to “cover up” for the last administration.

      2. Jeanne Stotler says:

        I agree, he’s had his own security for ages, and I am sure the place is swept on a reg. basis, hope they swept the WH, and threw out all land line phones, these are criminals who wanted to end what our forefathers started, and backed by Ge. Soros, otherwise where did Obama’s wealth come from??

  • bobnstuff says:

    Trump is loosing it. They need to give him sleeping pills so he can sleep at night and stop Tweeting. He has a bad dream and thinks it’s real so instead of waiting for day light he goes off in the middle of the night. He makes Nixon seem very sane. If Trump has proof of the wire taps and then can find a link to Obama he should make his case backed up with proof. Twitter isn’t the place to make this claim. Trump needs to stop listening to Tabloid Radio.

    1. pappy450 says:

      And YOU need to watch the REAL news and see all the OSCUMBAG is up to..Can you spell SEDITION? Seems he isn’t even bothering to hide it anymore because he is STILL “protected” by the “lame stream media”. Someone had to brief Trump.Oscumbag NEVER followed the “law” this is not to “farfetched” to be true.

      1. itsfun says:

        Obama will never give up his goal of making America a third world Muslim country.

        1. pappy450 says:

          YES and I just see on the news that his right-hand muslime, Jarrett has moved into the obama “mansion” to keep furthering the “shadow government”. SEDITION!

  • McFerguson says:

    “If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. Period. If you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan. Period.” – Obozo, 15 June 2009.

    Don’t believe anything this man says. Period. – McFerguson, 4 March 2017

    1. bobnstuff says:

      Isn’t it interesting that after eight years this is the only quote anyone comes up with.

      With Trump it’s hard to pick which lie to use.

      My favorite is “I will release my taxes.” or how about “the murder rate is the highest in 47 years” The fact that they are the third lowest in 47 years makes no difference to him. The one that got the whole world laughing at him was “Did you see what happened in Sweden last night.”

      1. Peter Smith says:

        “My administration is committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in government.” Really Bob?
        “I will sign a universal health-care bill into law by the end of my first term as president that will cover every American and cut the cost of a typical family’s premium by up to $2,500 a year.” must be talking about those few who got it free.
        “Allow Americans to buy their medicines from other developed countries if the drugs are safe and prices are lower outside the U.S.” LOL, it’s still there Bob.
        “We reject sweeping claims of ‘inherent’ presidential power.” Remember his quote,”I have a phone and I have a pen”? Inherent presidential powers indeed.
        “Will eliminate all income taxation of seniors making less than $50,000 per year. This will eliminate taxes for 7 million seniors — saving them an average of $1,400 a year– and will also mean that 27 million seniors will not need to file an income tax return at all.” Only tax “overhaul” Obama performed was to increase my taxes to pay for his ACA and to add the individual mandate.
        “If we have not gotten our troops out by the time I am president, it is the first thing I will do. I will get our troops home, we will end this war. You can take that to the bank.” What a bunch of BS from the DC Mulato.
        “We have a choice in this country. We can accept a politics that breeds division and conflict and cynicism…. That is one option. Or, at this moment, in this election, we can come together and say, ‘Not this time….’” So sayeth the great Divider-in-Chief.
        “We’ve got to spend some money now to pull us out of this recession. But as soon as we’re out of this recession, we’ve got to get serious about starting to live within our means, instead of leaving debt for our children and our grandchildren and our great-grandchildren.” $20 trillion in debt Bob.“
        [T]oday I’m pledging to cut the deficit we inherited in half by the end of my first term in office. This will not be easy. It will require us to make difficult decisions and face challenges we’ve long neglected. But I refuse to leave our children with a debt that they cannot repay – and that means taking responsibility right now, in this administration, for getting our spending under control.” He DOUBLED the national debt Bob.
        And the biggest lie of all Bob, “I, Barack Hussein Obama, do solemnly swear that I will execute the office of president of the United States faithfully, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the constitution of the United States.”
        Go pound sand “bobnstuff”, you’re another progressive liberal F-ing IDIOT and we have no time for your ilk.

        1. bobnstuff says:

          Trump has made the same promise about healthcare, lets see if he can pull it of and he doesn’t have the Republican promising to block everything. How many troops do we have in Iraq? Do you miss the body bags coming in daily? I will skip over the rest but address the idea that Obama doubled the debt. Congress doubled the debt. Ever budget Obama sent was DOA. Congress is the body that spends the money not the president and for the last six years they controlled the spending.

          1. Peter Smith says:

            Healthcare will be better than the ACA fiasco, guaranteed.
            http://www.militarytimes.com/articles/us-troops-wounded-iraq-syria-islamic-state
            Read for yourself Bob, Obama guaranteed ALL troops home, what happened? He lied to you F-ing cretins who supported him Bob. The body bags are still coming home Bob, even under the DC Mulato’s watch. How many times did HE go to the airfield to pay his respects to the fallen soldiers and their families? President Donald J. Trump is more of a president in 5 weeks that Obama was in eight years.
            You skip over the rest of the address because you received a large plate of crow and you can’t handle the truth Bob.
            And what does it say about the Obama budgets when even his OWN progressive liberal party rejected them? At least when he fulfilled his constitutional duty and actually presented one to Congress.
            Obama never had a budget passed because he never had a real budget submitted. The bulk of his final six years was paid for by continuing resolutions. The one time they refused to extend the resolution, the Obama administration and the liberal media tried to crucify the GOP.
            Well now, the DC Mulato is gone, get used to it Bob.

          2. bobnstuff says:

            Trump went to welcome the guy who died because of bad planning by the present government. Maybe they should hold some hearings to find out why the intel was so bad. As far as the presidents constitutional duties go dealing with the budget he basically has none. The constitution only says that the president can recommend actions to congress, it says nothing about hie preparing a budget.
            https://billofrightsinstitute.org/educate/educator-resources/lessons-plans/current-events/federal-budget-and-constitution/

          3. Rodney Steward says:

            Yo BOY never followed the Constitution at all and even called an old piece of paper at one time!! Bobby you’re such a sick puppy!

          4. Peter Smith says:

            “The military’s Joint Special Operations Command had been planning the mission for months, according to three senior American officials. Obama administration aides had deliberated extensively over the proposed operation, weighing the value of any information that might be recovered against the risk to the Special Operations forces plunging into hostile territory. But administration officials ultimately opted to hand the decision on the mission to their successors.

            “https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/29/world/middleeast/american-commando-killed-in-yemen-in-trumps-first-counterterror-operation.html?_r=0

            So, let’s go ahead and have YOUR hearings bob, we’ll find out just how pathetic your hero Obama really is. It was Obama and his intel that planned the mission. President Trump and his staff concluded the risk was worth the possible gains.

            As far as a budget, the 1921 Budget and Accounting Act, ” required the President to submit a proposed annual budget for the federal government to Congress, which added to the considerable power allocated to the Executive.” This law is still applicable today, although there have been some movement placing some of the budget matters back to Congress.

          5. bobnstuff says:

            The Obama administration suggested a review but Mattis pushed it through and Trump approved the raid.
            https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/a-raid-in-remote-yemen-and-a-seals-death-still-reverberate-for-trump/2017/03/01/0adc7b32-fd08-11e6-8ebe-6e0dbe4f2bca_story.html?utm_term=.cce2ecf6fec6
            Had the plan looked good you know very well Obama would have taken the glory and OKed it.

            You said it was the presidents constitutional duty but in fact it was a law passed in 1921. You can’t blame the President either Obama or Trump if congress doesn’t pass a budget.

          6. Peter Smith says:

            Do you deny the existence of the 1921 Law? Yes or No. Why did Obama not follow the law every year? Even when he did submit his budget, his own party voted against his budget. What does that say about Obama? President Trump hasn’t submitted a budget since the country is still operating under the final “Obama budget” at this time.
            Obama didn’t go with the Yemen raid because some of his advisers wanted to go in on the next new moon, a coincidence that would occur during the Trump administration. Your DC Mulato is and always will be the worst president the nation has ever and will ever see.

          7. gvette says:

            That actually started under Obama, Bob. Check the time line.

          8. bobnstuff says:

            Yes Obama’s people came up with the plan but he didn’t go with it and advised it should be reviewed. It was Mattis that gave the go ahead and Trump went with it. I guess someone didn’t check well enough.

          9. NM Leon says:

            The success or failure of a military mission is determined by whether or not it accomplished it’s mission. This one did in spades, according to the Pentagon.

            http://www.centcom.mil/MEDIA/NEWS-ARTICLES/News-Article-View/Article/1065112/us-raid-in-yemen-garners-intelligence/

          10. bobnstuff says:

            Had you read this report while Obama was president you would be screaming white wash. The lost an aircraft, one man three other wounded and killed a few people mostly women.

          11. NM Leon says:

            I take it you’ve never been in combat. A mission is rated on it’s success not on it’s casualties. The Nomandy invasion, D-Day, is rated as one of the greatest military successes though we lost over 10,000 men and huge numbers of air and naval assets.

            Many of the women killed were AQ fighters, but there were civilians killed…so what. Did you complain when Obozo had collateral damage from his drone strikes? Civilian casualties are a fact of war. Always have been and always will be.

          12. Retired says:

            bobnbull is so full of it , nothing can be absorbed anymore .

          13. bobnstuff says:

            So Mister Tabloid Conservative. You once again are back to you old myths.

          14. Retired says:

            bobnbull is that you OBAMA ??

          15. bobnstuff says:

            So did you ever find out who Ayn Rand was?

          16. NM Leon says:

            He’s one of our BB’s. He’s Bullschitte Bobby and the other is Bullschitte Billy, the fake “Dr”

          17. Retired says:

            Just add AK notsolady and you have the three Obama Stooges .

          18. Retired says:

            What does not check out well is your ignorance as to how a operation like that works , it had nothing to do with Trump . there is always a chance some may not return. Spread your lies elsewhere.

          19. bobnstuff says:

            So you are saying that Trump didn’t order the raid? Mattis didn’t approve it? I Guess that Trump isn’t the President then.

          20. Retired says:

            You were at the meting , discussing the plan ??? You keep proving what a idiot you are . Is your name Obama ??

          21. bobnstuff says:

            Do you think they discussed it?

          22. Retired says:

            Just not with you Obama .

          23. Retired says:

            Don’t you ever give up spreading lies.??

          24. bobnstuff says:

            We here from the Tabloid Conservative. What does the tabloids say today.

          25. Retired says:

            Never Read them like you do . That is where you Trash Trolls get your information from and Hollywood leads you by the nose that is still up Obamas rear .

          26. Roger says:

            The problem is they didn’t control the spending, everything Obama wanted Obama got, look at how much money was wasted on the affordable care act!

          27. bobnstuff says:

            The congress loved saying no to Obama. These was the group that shut down the government. Did you hear the Republicans may keep some of the taxes because the ACA was funded 100% and repealing it would mean a increase in the National Debt.

          28. MrThorox77 says:

            bob one word for you. Ger Stuffed

      2. McFerguson says:

        Here’s another: “You didn’t build that, somebody else did.” -Obozo trying to make a case for his strong Banana Republic.

        And another: “Your main objective should be to make the Muslim nations feel good about their past achievements in math, science and engineering.” Instructions to his brand new NASA Administrator, USMC General Charles Bolden, on 23 May 2009

        Last one: “The police acted stupidly.” – at Obozo’s press confrence on 23 July 2009, when he characterized the actions of the Cambridge police who arrested Harvard professor ‘Skip’ Gates, Obozo’s buddy, who himself acted stupidly as he attempted to break into his own home, and then attacked the police for arresting him. This incident was the initial phase of Obozo’s campaign to de-value the services of our law enforcement agencies and to galvanize street thugs and anti-police sentiment across the nation.

        1. bobnstuff says:

          Here’s the problem none of these things are lies. I have built a number of businesses and with out the things others do none would have been possible.

          My guess is you don’t understand just what the Muslim world gave us. We use the number system.

          The police did act stupidly in the arrest. Look at the facts.

          1. Webb says:

            The worse President in history, Obama, is Gone…

          2. Rodney Steward says:

            I’ll be glad when you have your head on one of your shovel handles from your muslim scum, or one of your mexican workers!

          3. McFerguson says:

            You’re one lame dude, bobnstuff. I imagine you had your greasy fingerprints all over Solyndra, the solar power company that went bust after taking $535 million in loan guarantees from the Obozo administration. And I can appreciate what the Islamic nations contributed to mankind up until about 700 AD when they went off the rails and decided to collectively pursue the barbarian route of killing people instead. And, no, the police did not act stupidly. Gates, himself, did. He maligned the police, called them racist and intensified the situation until they arrested him. Essentially, any child knows what he should do in a conflict with the police. Shut up, follow directions, and settle arguments later. Harvard professors should learn the same. And so should people who allegedly build businesses and pretend they owe their success to the government. Just sayin’…

          4. bobnstuff says:

            Ever heard of Atlantic City, how much of other peoples money did Trump lose there? Because of Obama the solar industry is now larger then the coal industry.

            You sure haven’t studied history much if you think that the Muslim contribution ended with the rise if Islam.
            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_inventions_in_the_medieval_Islamic_world

          5. NM Leon says:

            It was the regs and policies that Atlantic City passed that caused FIVE casino closings, only one of which was Trump’s.

            Solar is very labor intensive and uses more labor than any other, but solar and wind together are only larger than nuclear.
            Natural gas—32%
            Petroleum (crude oil and natural gas plant liquids)—28%
            Coal—21%
            Renewable energy—11%
            Nuclear electric power—9% http://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/?page=us_energy_home

            What’s the matter Bullschitte Bobby? can’t find any “contribution” since medieval times?

            You aren’t very good at this are you?

          6. bobnstuff says:

            Atlantic City was doomed from the time Trump came in. He overspent and paid to high an interest on his loans. He took a $1 billion project and made it $3.2 billion and financed it a 14%. The idea of the stimulus was job creation and solar did just that.

          7. NM Leon says:

            When I have started businesses I DID THAT. Yes, Dell built the servers I use, Cisco developed the software, etc, but I BUILT MY BUSINESS.

            Our “Arabic Hindu” numeral system was developed by Hindu mathematicians in India. The (more or less) form we use to denote the numerals was made by Arabs in Baghdad.

            The reason the digits are more commonly known as “Arabic numerals” in Europe and the Americas is that they were introduced to Europe in the 10th century by Arabic-speakers of North Africa, who were then using the digits from Libya to Morocco. Arabs, on the other hand, call the system “Hindu numerals”, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabic_numerals

            The officer did exactly what he was supposed to do. http://www.samefacts.com/archives/Police%20report%20on%20Gates%20arrest.PDF

          8. bobnstuff says:

            Thank you for the facts about our number system, it goes to show you can’t trust your seventh grade math teacher. You built your business on the effects of a bunch of people as you said. No man is an island and even though you might do the heavy lifting there are a number of others who’s work you have relied on.

          9. NM Leon says:

            Except that was not the context of Obozo’s speech. Obozo was saying that we needed government to help start businesses. If you have ever actually started a business, you know that’s ridiculous.

          10. bobnstuff says:

            So you didn’t have any roads leading up to your business? No police or fire protection? What did you use for money, clam shells? One of the main reasons for our government is to promote commerce. Some how the idea that you ever started a business seems a little hard to believe.

          11. NM Leon says:

            I pay taxes for all those services as do my clients, but none of them (including money) are required to be provided by the government except “post roads” In fact, there were very few roads in the US until the 20th century, police and fire departments were and are often private, and before 1912 all currency was issued by private banks.

            If your contention were correct, then every smart person would have a successful business as we all have access to tax supported infrastructure and services.

            if you’ve been successful, you didn’t get there on your own. You didn’t get there on your own. I’m always struck by people who think, well, it must be because I was just so smart. There are a lot of smart people out there. It must be because I worked harder than everybody else. Let me tell you something — there are a whole bunch of hardworking people out there. (Applause.)

            If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business — you didn’t build that.

            If Obozo had left it at “you didn’t get there on your own”, I wouldn’t have a problem with it, but to say “If you’ve got a business — you didn’t build that.” is insulting as hell.

            I most certainly DID build my businesses. I risked my own capital, I worked sometimes 100 hour plus weeks for no salary, I hired and fired employees.

            Yes I utilized government services, but the government doesn’t get one iota of credit for my success just because those exist (and are used by everyone), any more than my parents can take credit for my success because they had me.

          12. bobnstuff says:

            You knowledge of history is amazing. It’s almost as amazing as your ego. I have own a number of businesses and I truly understand the role of others in my success. I could go into a long tail of the development of the highway system and the roll of government in it. I could point out that improving our ports was one of the first acts of our young government. If you don’t understand the roll of government in commerce nothing I would say would educate you. Your little one man show makes you feel big but I would rather understand that I build on the work of others. I have had lots of help and try to pass that help along.

          13. NM Leon says:

            My ego Bulschitte Bobby? You’re the libtard trolling a conservative website, lol.

            Okay, let’s say the government built your businesses. Then why haven’t they built businesses for everyone? Are you accusing the government of preferential treatment?

          14. bobnstuff says:

            Anyone who wants to own a business can if the are willing to put the work in. Everything is there waiting for them except the hard work. There’s lots of help if you need it. I have turned down free up and running business more then once. I have helped a number of people start businesses. My last business I sold to one of store my manages. Anyone can own a business if they want to.

          15. NM Leon says:

            Now you’re talking about your own hard work (and presumably your capital)? But that’s ridiculous if you didn’t build that. Make up your mind there BB.

            Given the capital skill and willingness to work anyone could always start a business. Ancient flint knappers, pottery makers, etc were business people long before there was any government infrastructure or services. I wonder who built their businesses for them?

          16. bobnstuff says:

            If you go back in history you will see that commerce is tied to the development of the city. Until there way enough population for people to specialize there was no commerce. With cities can the infrastructure and early government. Business and government grow up together. Even 9000 years ago there was infrastructure to help build businesses.

          17. NM Leon says:

            Stop the bullschitte, BB.

            We have paleolithic evidence of commerce with dedicated flint quarries from 3.3 million years ago. That’s stone age hunter gatherer stuff. What kind of government infrastructure and services do you think they had?

            As far as archaeologists can tell, mankind have always been traders (business people), probably at least as far back as Australopithecus.

            People have been starting businesses for as long as there have been people in whatever environment they happened to find themselves in, whether it was the African Savannah with zero government (maybe a tribal chieftain) or modern America and doing it without government doing it for them (often in spite of government interference).

          18. bobnstuff says:

            Your hunter gatherers had no businesses. there was no trade or commerce. Everyone shared everything. Anthropologists will explain that the first societies were pure communist.There was nothing worth owning. They didn’t trade they raided. There society was based on family. Aboriginal tribes still work that way. Trade didn’t start until there were surplus created by the birth of agriculture and by then government was in place to make the rules. Even those African tribes on the Savannah have a type of government, a hierarchy. Government and religion developed about the same time.

          19. NM Leon says:

            The Encyclopaedia Brittanica says you are full of schitte (but everybody here already knew that).

            Hunter gatherers followed the herds and the harvest cycle, usually stopping at the same places year after year (we call them cave men for a reason). A tribe might be made up of extended family, but contact with “others” was mandatory for the gene pool to survive. During that contact trade would be the natural thing.

            Trade probably started with the development of stone tools (flint knapping). There is good evidence of stone tools being traded, as you’d expect given the difficulty, skill, and time required to make them and the scarcity of flint/obsidian quarries. We absolutely know that flint tools (especially obsidian) wound up far from it’s source, because we can not only age, but tell with certainty which individual site it was quarried from. You weren’t going to raid a tribe a thousand miles away to get flint knives, spearheads, etc, but through trade you might very well obtain them.

            There is also evidence of decorative items like beads and beadwork and possibly medicinal herbs being traded.

            We know that aboriginal tribes often had/have regular trading fairs (Pow Wow to American Natives) where all manner of trades took/take place. No government or infrastructure needed.

            I have visited aboriginal tribes in Indonesian New Guinea and Borneo (Kalimantan), and believe me, they are avid traders, not only with rarely seen outsiders, but with each other.

            Until very recently (circa 1950) the distinct groups in the Kalahari Desert of Botswana, Namibia, and South Africa, the ǃKung, ǀXam, ǂKhomani, Nusan (Nǀu), Khwe (Khoi, Kxoe), Naro, Haiǁom, Tsoa, Auen, Juǀ’hoan, Kua and, Gǀu and Gǁana that we collectively call San or Bushmen were hunter gatherers in a semidesert. They are the oldest population on earth, from which all other Africans came (and hence all of the rest of us) and lived as their ancestors had for probably at least 2.5 million years and they traded with each other on a regular basis (and intermarried, in a broad study of 121 African populations they were among the most diverse genetically). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2947357/ http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/worlds-most-ancient-race-traced-in-dna-study-1677113.html

            And all of that my friend is business.

            Agriculture and cities certainly accelerated trade, but they didn’t start it.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trade#Prehistory
            https://www.britannica.com/event/Stone-Age

        2. BOC says:

          Or that 400 billion left on the tarmac in Iran was not a ransom.

          1. bobnstuff says:

            It’s really cool to pay someone a ransom with their own money. Just for the record the story about money left on the tarmac was proven Fake News.

          2. BOC says:

            Sure bob, sure..,.. you keep singing that mantra….. You can see everyone on this board takes everything you write seriously. Keep playin’ Chief.

          3. pappy450 says:

            THAT is why I BLOCKED his dribble.

          4. BOC says:

            Hey Pappy,
            I actually like Bob. on the other hand that scurrilous hag, AN Lady, what a stretch calling herself a “lady”, is a discussion for another day.
            He’s not a bad guy, but I think he spends a bit too much time on his computer, but that’s his deal not mine. His problem is that his research on issues doesn’t go beyond the information that speaks to his own personal beliefs and ideology.
            However, I’m sure he can be a bit much for others on the board and fully understand the need to shut it off, just like when one of the fake news channels, aren’t they all, comes on and I have to get up and find the remote to change it to something more informative and real, like, say professional wrestling?!?!
            Have a wonderful, blessed Sunday and aren’t they so much more wonderful now than they were over the past 8 years?

          5. pappy450 says:

            BOC,
            You got THAT right. AK “lady” is one that NEEDS to be blocked for sure. It is ONE thing to have your own “beliefs:” and “Ideology”, but when all you can do is “parrot” the same OLD FAKE “liberal talking points” it gets OLD quick. You also have a Blessed Sunday and YES I see MORE “hope” of a better Country than I have seen in the last 8 years of the usurper.

          6. kbfallon says:

            His own mother told him if he sat in the tub and kept smelling his own farts it would damage his brain…but he’s still at it.

          7. BOC says:

            I wish I could more than one up vote! Glad I wasn’t drinking anything when I read this!

          8. Rodney Steward says:

            But NOT the ADDED extra Interest in GOLD!! This is what is called a FAKE President!

          9. bobnstuff says:

            You really need to stop getting your news from Tabloids. Most of the money didn’t even got to Iran but to the people she owed money to. The rest has been spent on things like airplanes and parts as well as equipment for their oil fields. They don’t hall loads of gold around or even pallets of cash. It’s all done electronically.

          10. Rodney Steward says:

            And top of the line anti – missile defense, more enriched uranium, and is also the leading backer of terrorism, but you don’t know this, you watch MSNBC and other comedy shows just like Tabloids!

          11. Retired says:

            You mean like the fake news of talking about the kids, easy to sell you a snow job.

          12. kbfallon says:

            You are a Fake…phony…a real person couldn’t possibly be so ignorant. Trying to talk sense to you is comparable to looking up a woodchucks azz and not liking what you see…..and then doing it again and again.

          13. bobnstuff says:

            Ok, prove your statement. I can give you links to prove what I say.

          14. kbfallon says:

            OK….?……..first–get yourself a woodchuck…..then see if you can get behind em….you may have to distract a bit….let me know if you get that far and i’ll give you some more direction…..are you one of them there city fellers?

          15. NM Leon says:

            Really? Can you provide links to prove that the only lie Obozo is accused of in 8 years is “If you like your Dr you can keep your Dr”?

            Can you provide links proving that Arabs developed our base ten math system?

            Can you provide links to prove that The hacked information and the false flag from the FBI was more than enough to have affected 77,000 votes in three states?

            Can you provide links proving that no other senators from the Armed Services Committee met Russians?

            That’s just a few of the totally false things you have stated here TODAY. Looks like kb is absolutely correct, and you are still Bullschitte Bobby.

      3. Glenn Trail says:

        bobnstuff…I was going to make a comment about your statement, but decided that you are not even worth the time.

        1. goldie says:

          I wish more people would see that and quit replying to his comments. He just fills the space up with idiocy.

      4. Webb says:

        Democrats cannot conceive the fact Trump Beat Hillary…
        The crying continues…We know your pain, but as you, We are enjoying It!

        1. bobnstuff says:

          It only took Russia and the FBI to get him elected. Then his victory is in the bottom third of wins. He squeaked by.

          1. Rodney Steward says:

            It was a LANDSLIDE Bobby!

          2. Webb says:

            A Win is a Win…
            Russia wasn’t involved in evey states election…That fact from National Security agents under Obama.
            Democrats ran A Loser… Then corruption in The DNC and Bernie getting screwed by his Democrat Cronies…
            An inch is as good as a mile…and as stated, The Crying Continues by Democrats everywhere especially in Congress!!

          3. bobnstuff says:

            I will agree that Clinton wasn’t a strong candidate but Trump would have lost if 77,000 votes in three states would have gone the other way. The hacked information and the false flag from the FBI was more then enough to do that.

          4. NM Leon says:

            You mean all the accurate information that was stolen and released?

          5. Retired says:

            No matter how hard Clinton pushed that story she still stunk and sunk.

      5. Rodney Steward says:

        That Turned out to be TRUE, you’re so D’N uninformed, you need to join a circus some where!

        1. Retired says:

          He is a circus.

          1. Rodney Steward says:

            LOL, he sure is and where in the he$$ does he get his info. or lack of, late night comedy shows!

          2. Retired says:

            Probably eats up SNL .

      6. Retired says:

        You should not talk about yourself that way , Obama TROLL

      7. chw2000 says:

        It’s idiot BOB, You can’t remember Obama quotes? Here’s just a couple to refresh your memory. ” I think i’ve been in all 57 states and only 2 more to go”. Or, I don’t know how to say that in Austrian”? Or, how about ” Polish death camps” ” When I bowled i looked like a Special Olympics participant”. There are literally 100’s more. Your time would be better served Bob, if you just went and played with yourself.

      8. NM Leon says:

        “I will release my taxes. after the IRS audit is finished“. “the murder rate is the highest in 47 years in the inner city

        There, fixed it for ya Bullschitte Bobby.

        1. bobnstuff says:

          http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/aug/30/donald-trump/donald-trump-wrong-inner-city-crime-reaching-recor/
          Sorry but the facts don’t back you up. Even Chicago isn’t a record.

          And Trump is now saying he will not release his taxes.

          1. NM Leon says:

            http://time.com/4497814/chicago-murder-rate-u-s-crime/

            I wouldn’t release my taxes either if I were him. It wouldn’t matter what they said, the left would pretend they were a scandal.

          2. bobnstuff says:

            Chicago’s record was 943 murders in 1992 I think the ended up with 762 in 2016. They aren’t even in the top ten as a murder per thousand. The number was going down until they had to give up on their gun control laws.

            We know Trumps taxes are going to make him look bad or we would have them already.

          3. NM Leon says:

            Newsflash “Chicago” does not count as an “inner city”. Try Austin and Englewood where the murder rate is >35 per 1000. In cities over 1 mil, they are second after Philly at 17.5 per 1000.

            Their gun control laws have near zero to do with the problem. Their failure to enforce current law and to turn armed felons over to the feds for additional prosecution has everything to do with it.

          4. NM Leon says:

            If you look at a list of the highest cities in the world, they are all prone to cold weather.

          5. ArcticGrayling says:

            Why should anybody release their taxes? As far as I know there is no law that says he must. As far as I know his only requirement is to report all his personal income as described in the law and report it to the IRS..

            Imagine if he did release his taxes. Then we would be listening to the likes of “know it all” butch broad diesel dyke Rachel MadCow and little nigger queer like Don Lemon (both of which probably have their own taxes professionally prepared) pontificate on stuff they know nothing about.

      9. ArcticGrayling says:

        Trump has released his taxes. Trump releases his taxes every year to the IRS. As far as I know, he hasn’t been charged with tax evasion.

        Lots of things are happening in Sweden, especially in no go zones in places like Malmö. Sand niggers.

      10. Pat Henson Ward says:

        Did you see what happened in Sweden? The neighborhood that was set on fire and many hurt? It came out the officials were trying to keep the lawlessness quiet so as not to deter the tourists, letting them think it was safe to travel there. Guess you missed that.

    2. Askjrsk says:

      Yes Nancy. Don’t you want to choke her with those donuts? Her eyes barely move from all that plastic in her face. She’d choke on the donut hole

      1. Nina says:

        That’s the demon you’re seeing in her eyes!!

        1. KT says:

          So! True…..And there are many more in the Whitehouse…..You can see it on Elizabeth Warren big time!

  • dirkshomebiz says:

    Still can’t understand why Prez Trump has not rescinded the illegal Obama executive order that black Obama wrote for himself, giving his entire tribe SS protection for life. Take that protection away and legal Americans will take care of the black piece of garbage.

  • Doug says:

    Anyone remember Watergate? Where is the Lamestream Media now? As usual, when a Democrat maybe did something wrong – missing in action until the facts force them to meekly get on the bandwagon.

  • Mort Leith says:

    Arrest ODumbo NOW !

  • TexRancher says:

    Laws didn’t stop Obama…..

    1. Chris Robinette says:

      Time for a full investigation to find the truth about Who, what, where, when and why?.

      1. Retired says:

        Will never happen if Democrats are involved, they have a vault full of judges to fill a stadium.

        1. Askjrsk says:

          Dominoes they will fall hard.

          1. Retired says:

            Many of us are hoping for that but the deck is stacked .

          2. Askjrsk says:

            We ll see!

        2. kbfallon says:

          Yes they do-plus they “lie faster than a horse can trot”….I love old sayings…they still are relevant.

          1. McFerguson says:

            How about, “quicker than a hiccup”?

          2. Annrcase says:

            Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours & have longer with friends and family! !do84c:
            On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
            !do84c:
            ➽➽
            ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialCashJobs374MarketStationGetPaid$97/Hour ★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫::::::!do84c:….,……..

          3. ArcticGrayling says:

            Muhammad’s mother was a whore.

      2. Askjrsk says:

        I’d say

      3. Retired says:

        That would also include the Clintons as well as the UN and OWO along with Obamy .

    2. Askjrsk says:

      True not like PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP will. OBAMAGATE is HUGE

      1. Nina says:

        They will trip up!!! Remember they have Peloosi on their side!!

        1. NM Leon says:

          From your keyboard to God’s ears!

  • I Seigel says:

    LOL! Your boy is losing it! Elmer is going wacko while Daffy, Wile E Coyote and Yosemite Sam run the country. Make America Great Again?

    1. dumbvet says:

      Do you know the whole story?

    2. Carl Lewis says:

      You will sing a different tune when Bambo is brought up on charges of Sedition and Treason. Plenty of evidence…just a matter of time. All this has backfired in the face of the “Foreign Student from Indonesia…born in Kenya”

      1. I Seigel says:

        And what if he sues Trump for libel and slander? Wouldn’t that be interesting?!

    3. Sick of Rino's says:

      President Trump isn’t losing it. He’s simply making Americans aware of the POS the liberal faction and the LameStream media have protected for 8 years. He’s already done more for America in 2 months than Obama did in 8 years but you empty-headed dipwads will never admit it. When Obama is arrested and sent back to Kenya, then perhaps you liberals will see the true damage done to this country. His policies very nearly turned this great nation into a 3rd world country but now that President Trump is in charge, all Obama’s evil machinations will be turned around and corrected.

    4. Rodney Steward says:

      He’s just got to clean out the rest of the coon’s SH!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Keep the Fake News Media in check.

Don’t let the MSM censor your news as America becomes Great Again. Over 500,000 Americans receive our daily dose of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness along with Breaking News direct to their inbox—and you can too. Sign up to receive news and views from The 1776Coalition!

We know how important your privacy is and your information is SAFE with us. We’ll never sell
your email address and you can unsubscribe at any time directly from your inbox.
View our full privacy policy.