PHOENIX â€” When Paul Clement walks into the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday, he’s going to try to convince at least five justices that Arizona has an inherent right to enforce federal immigration laws.
He needs them to believe that to get them to overturn lower court decisions which have so far concluded that key provisions of SB 1070, the state’s 2010 comprehensive measure aimed at illegal immigrants, are pre-empted by federal law.
Three law professors say Clement could have an uphill fight.
Paul Bender from Arizona State University College of Law said that, everything else being equal, the conservative justices would tend to side with the state in any legal battle. And the liberal branch of the court is short one of its players, with Elena Kagan having recused herself since she was federal solicitor general in the Obama administration, which is suing the state.
But this isn’t a normal case.
â€œThis is not a question of states’ rights versus individual rights,” said Gabriel â€œJack” Chin of the University of California at Davis.
â€œThis is a conflict between states’ rights and traditional federal authority. There, it’s not clear the traditional conservatives are interested in undermining federal authority in foreign policy and national security.”
That’s precisely what Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr. has argued, with the Obama administration even presenting arguments from foreign governments on how Arizona’s law interferes with their relations with the United States.
To read more, visit:Â http://www.yumasun.com/articles/federal-78460-state-law.html#ixzz1soncT2u7
Don’t let the MSM censor your news as America becomes Great Again. Over 500,000 Americans receive our daily dose of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness along with Breaking News direct to their inbox—and you can too. Sign up to receive news and views from The 1776Coalition!
We know how important your privacy is and your information is SAFE with us. We’ll never sell
your email address and you can unsubscribe at any time directly from your inbox.