Olympic opening ceremony: Boisterously, Britishly odd

July 28, 2012

By Robert Bianco, USA TODAY

If the goal of an Opening Ceremony is to get you talking about the Olympics, consider London’s a success.

True, much of the talk inspired by NBC‘s tape-delayed broadcast Friday night probably hovers somewhere between “well, that was just nuts” to “what the …?” But as long as it shoves the Olympics to the front of the national conversation, NBC will take it.

Granted, “strange” seems to be the Opening Ceremony stock in trade these days, as each organizer tries to out-do, and out-shock, the last. But even when you apply the 1992 Albertville opener-as-Cirque du Soleil standard, London’s show, designed by Oscar-winning Slumdog Millionaire director Danny Boyle— with its grassy knoll and light-board hospital beds — was boisterously, Britishly odd.

It was delightful at times, to be sure. But just as often, it was trying so hard to create magic and impart meaning that it became impenetrable.

The Queen parachuting into the stadium as a Bond girl? Fun. Rowen Atkinson destroying Chariots of Fire?Peculiar, but fun. The flying bicycle dove? Also fun, even if it did look more like a flying monkey.

But the dancing sick-kids salute to the National Health Service, complete with a Mary Poppins air raid and a giant Franken-baby? Much less fun, and more than a bit bizarre. “I don’t know if that’s cute or creepy,” said NBC’s Matt Lauer proclaimed about the baby, as if “cute” were actually an option.

As for the house-afire digital-age tour of British popular music, it was way too long, and the story it was barely telling kept getting in the way of the songs. But even at that, it was better than an opening effort to tell the history of Britain, complete with a pause for World War I and a rip-up-the-grass switch from agrarian to industrial that aimed for spectacle and instead just seemed like the longest scene change ever aired.

Perhaps the lesson is that you cannot tell the story of a people and culture on a stadium field, no matter how many high-tech enhancements and volunteer dancers you have at your disposal. Note to Rio: Please, don’t try.

It’s hard to imagine why these events have to run on so long — you could have recreated the first Olympics in the time it took to get to those kids lighting that cauldron (a neat effect), let alone by time you got to Paul McCartney‘s concert. And while we’re pondering, are we now stuck with that silly looking hill in the stadium for the next two weeks, or was it a one-night-stand folly?

A scattershot collection of lights, songs and music, London’s ceremony lacked the awe-inspiring, heavily rehearsed, synchronized mass madness of Beijing. On the plus side, if it seldom made you marvel, it also never forced you to consider the amount of state-organized repression required to get that many people to drum as one.

To read more, visit: http://www.usatoday.com/life/television/reviews/story/2012-07-28/Olympic-Opening-Ceremony/56551368/1

1 Comment - what are your thoughts?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Keep the Fake News Media in check.

Don’t let the MSM censor your news as America becomes Great Again. Over 500,000 Americans receive our daily dose of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness along with Breaking News direct to their inbox—and you can too. Sign up to receive news and views from The 1776Coalition!

We know how important your privacy is and your information is SAFE with us. We’ll never sell
your email address and you can unsubscribe at any time directly from your inbox.
View our full privacy policy.