TX: High court pressed for time in redistricting case

by
January 10, 2012

By Joan Biskupic, USA TODAY

WASHINGTON – In a closely watched fight over Texas voting districts and the rights of Latinos, Chief Justice John Roberts aptly observed, “We are all under the gun of very strict time limitations.”

Monday’s Supreme Court arguments in a case that could affect voting rights nationwide were marked by frustration among the justices. On one side is a looming Texas primary schedule. On the other, separate proceedings in a lower court in Washington could eclipse any action the justices take.

At the end of the sometimes testy session, it was unclear which way the high court was headed among competing interests. Texas Republicans want reinstatement of maps drawn by the GOP-dominated Legislature. Mexican-American advocates favor a lower-court-drawn interim map. The U.S. Justice Department wants the case returned to a lower U.S. court in San Antonio for further proceedings.

The dispute is being closely watched as numerous challenges from other states and localities have been made to a provision in the landmark 1965 Voting Rights Act forcing certain places, mostly in the South, to submit their election procedure changes for screening, also called “pre-clearance.”

Liberals, such as Justice Sonia Sotomayor, expressed skepticism for the Texas Legislature‘s plan, which has yet to be screened under the Voting Rights Act to see whether it would hurt minority voters and their chances to elect their candidates of choice. “I don’t see how we can give deference to an enacted new map, if section 5 (of the Voting Rights Act) says don’t give it effect until its been pre-cleared,” she said.

Cconservatives such as Roberts suggested there should be no presumption that such pre-clearance would be denied, as a lower federal court in San Antonio presumed.

“I don’t know how you lean one way and say, it’s horrible, you can’t use (the state Legislature’s plan) because it hasn’t been pre-cleared,” Roberts said, “but it’s all right in drawing the interim plan to treat it as if pre-clearance has been denied.”

Justice Anthony Kennedy, traditionally a key vote in racially charged cases, expressed some sympathy for Texas because it is one of the nine states that must submit any voting-district maps or changes in electoral procedures to federal officials before they can be implemented.

To read more, visit: http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/judicial/story/2012-01-09/supreme-court-texas-redistricting/52473116/1

No comments yet - you can be the first!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Keep the Fake News Media in check.

Don’t let the MSM censor your news as America becomes Great Again. Over 500,000 Americans receive our daily dose of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness along with Breaking News direct to their inbox—and you can too. Sign up to receive news and views from The 1776Coalition!

We know how important your privacy is and your information is SAFE with us. We’ll never sell
your email address and you can unsubscribe at any time directly from your inbox.
View our full privacy policy.