Emily Kohrs, a 30-year-old Atlanta resident who was the forewoman for the special grand jury for eight-months, expressed excitement about the “not short” list of indictment suggestions that would be handed out and that there would not be any “plot twist” when public finally sees their findings. She spoke about “The big name that everybody keeps asking me about” Trump, saying “I don’t think you will surprise.”

Even leftist media pointed out the bias. CNN’s Anderson Cooper, Elie Honig and CNN’s Elie Holnig wondered if Kohrs’ media blitz had been “responsible.”

“First, I don’t understand why this person is speaking on TV. She’s clearly having fun, but is she responsible? Cooper said that she was the foreperson on this grand jury.

“No. Honig replied, “It’s a prosecutor’s nightmare.” “Mark my words, Donald Trump’s team will make a motion to dismiss the indictment that was based on grand jury impropriety. She is not allowed to talk about anything. She’s not supposed to be discussing the deliberations.

After the media junket, Trump’s lawyers were quick to take advantage of this opportunity.

Drew Findling, Trump’s lawyer, responded by saying “We’re just thinking about everything” and adding that the Georgia inquiry was “poisoned”, due to Kohrs’ appearances.

Findling said, “If, let’s say, there’s a recommendation that goes to a grand jury,” “All potential grand juries living in this area of the country who listen to radios, read newspapers, watch TV, and go online to check out the latest news alerts are now reading about deliberations or what could possibly be interpreted as grand jury deliberations.”

Trump himself attacked Kohrs on Truth Social Wednesday for “doing an Media Tour that revealed, incredibly, Grand Jury’s inner workings and thoughts.”

Maggie Haberman, NYT’s Maggie Haberman, stated to CNN that “If I am the prosecution, I amn’t sure that this media tour is taking place because it’s going to be used by Donald Trump’s lawyers.”

On Wednesday, Charlie Hurt from the Washington Times spoke to Tucker Carlson about the dangers of politicized jury members.

It’s easy to laugh at her, but think about this: If this was a serious case and there were serious adult prosecutors prosecuting the case, you could be facing life imprisonment. You looked up at the jury room and saw the lunatic in the box.

These people make a mockery out of everything we stand up for. I would argue that even more important than voting in this country is the idea of a jury made up of your peers. “You can’t be railroaded or coerced by people like you.”