Trump: Clinton’s bodyguards should drop guns and ‘see what happens to her’

by Harper Neidig | The Hill
September 17, 2016

Donald Trump on Friday said that Hillary Clinton’s Secret Service detail should have their guns taken away to “see what happens to her.”

During a rally in Miami, Fla., Trump railed against Clinton’s gun control policies, saying she wants to “destroy your Second Amendment.”

“I think that her bodyguards should drop all weapons,” he said. “They should disarm. Right? I think they should disarm immediately.

69 Comments - what are your thoughts?

  • Bethimckim1 says:

    Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !st28f:
    On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash318MediaPropertyGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★::::::!st28f:….,……..

  • Karll says:

    Trump should’ve also mentioned the WALL she’s placed
    around her NY “compound” to keep out undersirables.
    Hypocritical much, hellary?

  • Linda Pfister says:

    THATS WHAT MR. TRUMP was talking about is if we AMERICAS cant carry to protect us then they shouldn’t have guns either they are no better than us they need to live by the laws that they the cock roaches make us live under the parasites are not NOT SPECIAL NOR SHOULD THEY BE above the law

  • Linda Pfister says:


  • ONLYJB1 says:

    Great point, but unfortunately it will never happen! Now take away what ever her team carries to inject her with during one of her spells and we might be on to something!

  • onefour says:

    This stand Hillary has on guns is another case of those that have don’t want the rest of others to have. In other words they get lifetime protection while taking away that same protection for the rest of us. Some of the elites in this country are becoming like the aristocrats of Europe in the 19 century and early 20th and we are becoming their serfs.

  • Elaine Morris says:

    Hillary Bagged and Perp Walked. Gratitude to US Special Forces.

    1. Karll says:

      Oh come on! Hand cuffs?
      The bich was in the midst of a severe neurological event.
      I love the fact that the agents dropped her, and then had
      to toss her in her ambulance…err…van.
      I hope, for their sakes, that she doesn’t order them killed.

      1. Elaine Morris says:

        Your comment had me Laughing so hard, I had to gather myself before I could comment!!
        You speak the same thoughts in my language. We can never get confused if it is blunt and to the point!

  • Freedom says:

    When she takes our guns the MUSLUM TERRORIST and MUSLUM RELIGON LUNITICS will be coming after her. I hope they put her in as pain like she did the 4 lives she took in in BENGHAZI.

    1. Karll says:

      All the pig has to do is add two more leftist radical hacks
      to the US Supreme Court and the Second Amendment
      will be essentially nullified shortly thereafter.

      1. Bethimckim1 says:

        Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !st28f:
        On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
        ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash318MediaPropertyGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★::::::!st28f:….,…….

      2. The Redhawk says:

        PPICK one from the CBC and Loretta Lynch and there you have two Possible MORONS for SCTUS with SHARPIMPTON or ERIC HOLDER are POSSIBLE other CRETINS for the jobs!

    2. The Redhawk says:

      So here is the Question of the DAY, after the NYC bomb “incident”
      Which NUMB NUT from the Liberal anti gun KKLAN will be proposing a Total BAN on Pressure COOKERS????

  • CBUJAN says:

    She probably be stoned to death just like the muslims she supports

  • The Redhawk says:

    THe Hypocrisy of the “FREE” press ( joke)
    Shillery wants to abolish GUNS for EVERY CITIZEN….Bur has a Platoon of Gun Toting Security all around her ( is she really that SCARED)??
    Trump says that may be she should Practice what she “preaches”..
    And the Moribund WASH Compost calls trump a “killer” Now for anyone with more that TWO functioning Live brain-cells ( no, not KKKLINTON Kamp followers) this is ABSURDITY!!! cannot wait to hear what CNN, BS nbc and the three Network of talking Horse’s rear ends will ” manufacture” as “NEWS” How about that Matt Lauer…

  • chocopot says:

    Hillary and the rest of the Communists – er, I mean Democrats – have been trying to disarm us for nearly 50 years now. For them to claim they respect The Second Amendment and then turn around and do everything they can to destroy it is despicable. There is only one reason for them to want to disarm us: so they can create a dictatorship. Why else would they be so afraid of armed citizens?

    1. bobnstuff says:

      You don’t think that maybe all those people dying from being shot might have a little to do with their wanting to limit guns?

      1. The Redhawk says:

        BUt statistically More folks are Killed by HAMMERS than guns….shall we CLOSE every Hardware STORE ? Are Guns the killers or very Crazy or IDIOTIC people and Anarchists ???you CRETIN

        1. bobnstuff says:

          Very funny but where did you get that number? You are more likely to be struck by lightning twice then by terrorists but we spend billions on stopping those deaths and have given up a lot of rights doing it. You are now just about as likely to die from a gun then from a car. Gun deaths are a problem, admit it and come up with a solution to the problem. We cut auto deaths in half with out taking cars away.

          1. Rodney Steward says:

            But yet, America ranks 112th in the world in gun violence, he just may be right about the hammers! Do U know the number one killer, the KNIFE!!! And cell phones being 2nd now!

          2. The Redhawk says:

            And now you got thr NUMB NUTS “COMFUSED”Like the Facts that say that MORE HAMMERS kill in the USA than Guns.. SO Close Home Depot or LOCK up the DUMMIES

          3. mrpoohead says:

            108th on the best results in decades. All of Europe is better – substantially. America at bottom of pile in Modern countries. Homicide rate on par with Cuba and Libya – nice! Last year we averaged a mass shooting per day – UK one in ten years, Australia one in twenty, Switzerland two in forever. America – toilet of humanity.

          4. Rodney Steward says:

            What rock U been under, have U not been keeping up with the very LARGE infestation of muslims that have all but destroyed Europe, rapes, beatings, killings, robbing, just plain gutter rats! And these SAME countries have told us NOT to take in these made up refugees, but what does the brown clown do, double what he said to start with, and Hellary will 5 fold these numbers! And the 112th came from an FBI report, and what you’re saying about these European countries is pure bullshi$ NO FACTS HERE!

          5. mrpoohead says:

            Try Googling homicide rate per capita per country – duh!
            Current figures put them at 108th – but four spots immaterial.
            Europe – no Muslim hordes. Turkey has 2 million Syrian refugees, Lebanon 1, Jordan’s population has grown by 25%. Europe has 10,000s over a big space. Rape has not risen exponentially – though in Sweden it has – however squeezing a ladies behind also comes under the definition of rape in Sweden.
            If the Syrian Crisis continues then refugees will be assessed and moved around world. Don’t worry per capita US takes smallest numbers – obviously repatriation best case scenario, same thing happened after WWII with East Europeans.
            Islamic terrorism makes up 5% of all (FBI and Europol figures).
            Get a life dopey!

          6. Rodney Steward says:

            Sorry moophead, but this is on the news all the time, and this BS just don’t add up!! Do U even own a TV, or even a radio, and you’re calling me dopey!!

          7. mrpoohead says:

            Yes, it’s cherry-picked you ignoramus.

            Example; last year we averaged a mass shooting per day (NY Times and Time magazine had stories). Which one made the TV news? San Berardino – why? More shocking if it’s a Muslim, none of the others were. Duh! Yup; you’re dopey.

          8. Rodney Steward says:

            Yep, there has been more mass shooting under this President than any other in history, and the last 4 have been by muslims, RIGHT, doesn’t say much about the Prez. does it! No wonder Carter is so happy!

          9. mrpoohead says:

            Nada, nicht.

          10. Rodney Steward says:

            Living in denial !

          11. The Redhawk says:

            hAHAHAHA…ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ…. Are you asmuch of a MORON as SHI T LERY???

          12. The Redhawk says:

            Are you ready to BAN PRESSURE COOKERS NOW??

      2. chocopot says:

        You are just another brainwashed fool. Putting aside the fact that the Constitution protects our right to own firearms as individuals, let’s take a look at the simple facts. Countless studies have been performed showing, without question or doubt, that firearms in the hands of civilians save many times more lives than they take. The overwhelming majority of police officers in this nation support and defend the right of private citizens to own firearms. And finally, despite the fact that the number of firearms in civilian hands has doubled during the last 15-20 years, the murder rate has been halved and violent crime has also gone way down. So no, I do not think that people dying frrm guns has anything at all to do with the desire of the Communists – er, I mean the Democrats – to disarm us. Gun control has never had and does not now have anything at all to do with crime or criminals. It has always been about disarming the civilian population so the Left can create a dictatorship without having to worry about 100 million armed citizens on the loose. Even the Democrats, when proposing and trying to push through more and more gun control laws, freely admit those laws will do nothing to stop or reduce crime. So why do they propose more laws? Very simple: to make it more difficult for law-abiding citizens to purchase and own firearms. So why would they do that? I have already explained that. And every time one of the Dems tells us that no, they don’t want to disarm us, they just want to protect the children – or some other tripe – their own words put the lie to it. Go back 10 or 20 years and check the statements made by these same lying bastards and you will find that every one of them, at some point, has made it clear that the goal is disarmament. In addition, gun owners in this country, as a group, are the most law-abiding subset of people in this country, In fact, they commit way less crimes per capita than police officers. Learn your facts and do some thinking before making stupid, uneducated posts. I could educate you plenty more, but I do not have the time. Educate yourself.

        1. bobnstuff says:

          Your countless studies paid for buy the gun industry in fact don’t show that more guns make us safer. The number of guns is up but the number of gun owners really isn’t.

          1. chocopot says:

            You’re an idiot. I use FBI statistics and studies performed by INDEPENDENT organizations. And the publications you cite are somewhere to the left of Joe Stalin. Just keep living in your fantasyland.

          2. bobnstuff says:

            Really? I showed you where I got my information from. Do you want more links because there are a lot. If more guns make you safer explain why as one of the highest gun per capita countries why are we not the safest? Why is Texas not the safest state and Hawaii not the least safe? Since the government is banned from doing studies by congress who pays for the studies?

      3. Rodney Steward says:

        They be called thugs, as in black on black killings, and the BLM terrorist group, the new putty tats, all these thug groups will always have guns! Why make the rest of America pay by taking their guns! But if your scared of guns, buy a flip, see how long U last in a gun fight!!

        1. bobnstuff says:

          They will always have guns as long as those nice white people at the NRA fight for their rights to have them. Where do you think those guns come from, are they making them in the ghetto? Are there gun factories in the Hood?

          1. Rodney Steward says:

            They get their guns from the same place they’re getting their drugs, and the last time I donated to the NRA, they weren’t in the drug business!

          2. bobnstuff says:

            Why is it so easy for them to get guns? Maybe if gun owners took the effort to keep their guns safe it would be so easy to steal them. What group got all upset about a law making you lock you guns up if you aren’t around. You can make Meth at home, you can grow weed in the woods, where are guns made and who makes them? Who sells them, I bet that new guns are sold by dealers and not by drug dealers. Where are the guns coming from? Do you think maybe those guns are coming from the very people the NRA are trying to protect from law suits? I just love the fact that the head of a nonprofit gets paid over a million dollars per year.

          3. Rodney Steward says:

            It’s this injustice dept. that’s feeding them the guns so they can push their gun control agenda, just like Holder and Obama running guns to the mexicans, they want as much violence as possible for their sick game, and you’ve fallen for it hook, line, and sinker! You don’t keep up with some things do U !!

          4. metheoldsarge says:

            Where have you been?

            In 2010, Wayne LaPierre called Senator Reid “a true champion of the Second Amendment” and said “no one has been a stronger advocate for responsible gun ownership than him.”

            The NRA has supported six gun grabbers that I know of. Sometimes I don’t think that even the NRA has a clue of who is pro or anti-gun. The NRA gave high ratings and endorsements to gun grabbers like Harry Read, Kristin Gilibrand, Mark Warner, Bob Casey, Joe Manchin and Thad Cochran. Cochran also got a generous donation and endorsement from Bloomburg. They are falling right into line with Obama’s anti-gun agenda. Just makes me wonder how many other anti-gun politicians the NRA has supported.

    2. metheoldsarge says:

      The anti-gun movement goes back a lot more than 50 years. Pacifists were trying to kill the Second Amendment back in the 1930s. If they had their way then, there would be a good chance that the Japanese and the Germans would have been shaking hands at the Mississippi. Until the Battle of Midway, we were losing the war in the Pacific. It was by the grace of God or luck that Midway was the turning point. Our Pacific Fleet could also have been wiped out, leaving our West Coast defenseless.

      Admiral Yamamoto believed that an invasion of the US would be extremely costly. No there was no blade of grass statement. Bet some of you thought I was going to site it. He spoke fluent English. He was educated at Harvard and he spoke fluent English. He also spent several years in America as Japanese Naval Attache and knew the American People. That means he knew a large majority of the American families were armed.

      How lucky for us the pacifists didn’t get their way or we could all be goose stepping now. Half of us under Japanese rule and the other half under Nazi rule. There are those who still insist that the American People would be a lot safer if guns are outlawed. They should be careful what they hope for because they just may get it.

      Remember outlaws don’t obey the law and will have guns. If the gun control supporters get their wish of a disarmed American public, what tune will they be singing if some outlaw with a gun robs them or possibly kills family members? I said it before that the police are only minutes away, but that is little comfort when seconds count.

  • bobnstuff says:

    I love how little Trump understands things. Gun control is one of those things. The guns that Clinton’s security carry have never been on any list to ban. Must of the gun control rules put forward are common sense thing that the NRA at one time supported. Our gun death rate is on a third world level and that is a real problem. What is Trump going to do about all those people dying. Trump talks real tough on terrorists and is willing to over look our rights to fight terrorists even though very few people die from terrorist attacks, in fact you are five times more likely to be shot by a cop then by a terrorist. If these gun deaths were being caused by anything other then guns we would be spending billions of dollars trying to find a solution to the problem but because they are gun deaths they are protected under the second amendment they can’t even be studied by the government. As far as I can tell the only amendment that Trump supports is the second and he doesn’t even understand that one.

    1. The Redhawk says:

      So may be “ELIMINATING” all BLM rethorical demands to Kill COPS is a START??? Do guns shoot folks or the MORONS that PULL the Triggers?? DO we have the Right for SELF protection against such Criminals that are NOT lawfully prosecuted and taken out of circulation by an AWOL DOJ and Criminal justice System???And why not have ALL politicians that DEMAND the Guns be Taken OUT of Private Citizen be free from SS Protection or armed Guards to protect them????

      1. bobnstuff says:

        My guess is you have never looked at any of the gun control bills, None of them disarm you, they limit who can buy guns and try to keep them out of the wrong hands. Most of the laws are meant to keep guns out of those people you fears hands but you wouldn’t know that. Are you planning to need a thirty round clip to defend your home?

        1. The Redhawk says:

          My guess is that a FEW multi rounds short clips or a mega rounds ONE clip have similiar Effect… One just has to know how to use them for SELF DEFENSE…and in case you have NO CLUE….Multi rounds NON AUTOMATIC AR 15 ( for example) can be fired only at Each trigger pull just like a 9 mm hand gun or a .45 Hand gun….Now Automatic assault Weapons should only be used by the Military ot Police under extreme conditions…in Civilian protection efforts like when a gang of Anarchists or Criminals have US under attack …. unless like politicians have a platoon of gun toting Security is all around them…carryig a Bunch of 12/18 rounds clips in their hand guns…and the differenv=ce IS????????????????????

          1. bobnstuff says:

            If you need thirty rounds to protect your home you shouldn’t own a gun because you don’t know how to use one. One shoot kills. An AR15 will shoot at a rate of better then 90 shoots per minute in the right hands and can be converted to fully automatic with out to much trouble. It’s not the gun but the size of the clip that matters. If you want to defend your home get a 12

          2. Rodney Steward says:

            U must have went to Joe blows double barrel gun class, and it’s not a bad weapon at close range, but at times U have to reach out and touch someone, that’s where the AR as U call it comes in handy! I know a lot about the M-16 # AR15, I lived with one for 12 years in the military!! And 30 RDs is nothing when 5 people are trying to raid your house!

          3. bobnstuff says:

            Where do you live that five people are going to raid your house. I would take the M1 Grand over the AR15 but not for defending my home. I have this thing about going to jail and if you reach out touch people you will be in jail. If it’s the government you will be dead.

          4. Rodney Steward says:

            I did it for the GOVERNMENT!

          5. The Redhawk says:

            More tounds make for Fewer Magazines to reload!! NUMB NUTS! Now try to learn the Difference betwern an SUTOMATIC WEAPON nad a SEMI Automatic weapon…Don;t be an idiot like SEN FEINSTEIN who had NO idea of what she was talking about!!!

          6. Bill Hartman says:

            I suspect that you actually believe that. But actually, only about 25% of shots fired even BY TRAINED POLICE OFFICERS in real guns fights hit their targets. If the perps are shooting at you, then you do not have the luxury of carefully aiming each shot. So yes, you can go through more than a few rounds.

            I will put it another way. Back in the 70’s, police officers carried revolvers. But it was discovered that officers were dying because 6 shots is not enough if there is more than one perp. Likewise, the 1911 45 semi-auto pistol has been replaced by 9mm pistols where used by police and military, as 8 rounds simply isn’t enough either.

          7. bobnstuff says:

            When you look in a cop car do you see AR15 or a shoot gun? The shoot gun is much less picky about aiming and can take out more then one person at times plus that large barrel in itself has a value.
            One of the good things about our world is how rare it is for a police officer to shoot his weapon. If you listen to the talking heads you would be lead to believe that there are shoot outs all over the place and that officers are dying left and right. It just isn’t the case. As far as dangerous jobs police officer isn’t in the top ten, it’s number 17 in fact.

          8. Bill Hartman says:

            I agree with all of your points. In particular, BLM (and liberal politicians and media supporting them) try to imply that police-on-black shootings are common, and that the police are usually in the wrong. Police SWAT teams do often use AR15 or equivalent, but not other officers.

            However, my points that you are replying to stand. Although it is rare for an officer to shoot his gun, in a real gun fight with more than one perp, he needs more than a few rounds. A person carries a gun for the worst case scenario, not the best.

        2. The Redhawk says:

          So are Pressure cookers to be Taken off al STORE SHELVES ??? Yiou NUMB NUTS!

        3. Karll says:

          Bull! That’s the same old garbage the left has been shoveling for years.
          They are incrementally restricting US citizens Second Amendment rights with the end goal of outlawing the ownership of firearms altogether. Feinstein, Reno, Bloomberg have said as much.

    2. Rodney Steward says:

      Try to stick to something you know about, because GUNS AIN’T IT, U fall in the stupid category on that!

      1. The Redhawk says:

        THE NUMB NUTS does not have a simgle CLUE about what he is blabbing about!!

      2. bobnstuff says:

        Sorry guy but you really don’t impress me. I grow up with blank 50 cal. in my toy box. Just because I don’t want nut jobs and gang bangers from getting guns doesn’t mean I did know anything about them.

        1. Rodney Steward says:

          Well thank God you’re not as stupid as U act, and I’m like U, been around all types of weapons too and who in the he$$ wants any nut job to have a gun! We’re all talking about civilized people here, that should not have their rights taken away to own a gun! NO ONE wants IDIOTS to have guns, they’re called THUGS!!

    3. Bill Hartman says:

      Huh? Liberal politicians have, indeed, suggested that semi-auto handguns (which is nearly all handguns) should not be in civilian hands. Exactly the weapons used by the secret service. Restrictions on the issuance of concealed carry permits, which gun control advocates believe should be very limited, are all about handguns. Rifles and shotguns cannot be concealed.

      Hillary wants to take away from others exactly those firearms that are being used to protect her.

      1. bobnstuff says:

        Here’s an idea, why don’t the republicans put together a real gun control law that will cut down on guns in the wrong hands and show they value life. There was a time when the NRA would be pushing for better laws to protect people instead of protecting the gun manufactures. Now here is where Clinton stands on gun control, it’s not what Trump or the NRA says it is.

        “I’m not looking to repeal the Second Amendment. I’m not looking to take people’s guns away,” she said. “But I am looking for more support for the reasonable efforts that need to be undertaken to keep guns out of the wrong hands.”

        1. Bill Hartman says:

          I am going to give you the benefit of the doubt, that you are not dishonest, but merely ignorant on the subject of gun control. Please verify my facts through official sources, if you have any remaining doubts.

          I followed your link and read the material. First and foremost, it (accurately) depicts the way that Hillary has changed on gun control over time, back and forth, to whatever seems politically expedient. So her words on the subject (as well any any subject you might wish to choose) cannot be relied upon.

          There is no “gun show loophole”. The rules for gun sales at gun shows are exactly the same as anywhere else in the US. If the seller is a dealer, that dealer must do a background check. If the seller is not a dealer, then there are no requirements, if the sale is face-to-face. Those who buy booths to sell guns at gun shows are, of course, dealers (you can sell only a limited number of guns a year without a license)..

          Internet sales always require background checks. If you buy a gun through the internet, you are required to have it delivered to a local dealer, who must do a background check before giving you the gun.

          Making gun manufactures legally liable for acts beyond their control would be the equivalent of abolishing the second amendment. All gun manufactures would be shut down. There is, after all, no such thing as a “safe gun”. A firearm’s function is to do violence; thus, this is even less fair than holding a kitchen knife manufacturer responsible for a death by knife. No one who purchases a firearm is unaware of its deadly abilities, and must assume responsibility for its use.

          So her so-called “reasonable” restrictions are, in fact, either empty talking points or effective gun sale bans.

          In short, all of the article’s core “facts” are outright lies.

          The basic point is that criminals do not obey gun laws, and thus such laws only take guns away from non-criminals.

          1. bobnstuff says:

            I read this a while back. You might find it interesting.

            I grow up around guns and was taught at a early age to respect them. I find that I wasn’t the norm though. I have seen some very unsafe gun handling from people who should know better. One day I went to pick up my twelve year old son from a friends house and when I walked into the living room on the table was a 9 mm. the only two people in the room was my son and his friend. The next week-end I took my son out and taught him the basics of gun safety. He also never got to visit that friends house again. I am pretty sure the government will never come for my guns, even if they wanted to it can’t be done.

          2. Bill Hartman says:

            Article is interesting, but not at all surprising. Most guns used by criminals were stolen. Since Chicago suppresses civilian gun ownership, it makes sense that crooks would be stealing most of their guns from the suburbs.

            It also shows how rare it is to identify a criminal based on the registration of the firearm. Making registration of little practical use.

            A quick-open gun safe to keep a firearm out of the reach of children is practical. But a safe which can keep out a determined bugler yet allow for easy access is nearly impossible. Thus, they do get stolen. I have also seen statistics on how many police firearms go missing or stolen. No easy answers.

          3. bobnstuff says:

            No easy answer is the truth here but we as a nation need to find one. The reason why gun registration doesn’t work is because there isn’t really any. We have no data base to work with. I own guns and no one has any record of them. I don’t have their numbers written down, never even thought to do it till right this moment. I fave no fear of them being stolen since they would have to find all the pieces. I don’t lock up the guns, just the bolts and not with the guns. The problem is someone has sold people on the idea that they should fear the police and the government. We live in a democratic nation and we choose our government so why do so many people fear it. I respect my local police and have been very thankful for their help from time to time. I don’t fear them and the idea that the government is coming for our guns is about as stupid a idea as has ever been put out there. Just who is going to take your gun? The police? The military? add both these groups together and you don’t have 2% of the population. Add in the fact that both these groups are private gun owners and the whole idea that big brother is coming for our guns becomes absurd.

          4. Bill Hartman says:

            Sounds logical. However, not only is it possible, it has actually happened. Here in the US. Twice that I know of.

            In California, the legislature passed a law requiring the registration of all so-called “assault rifles” (meaning certain rifles that have military-looking features like metal or synthetic where there might be wood on a hunting rifle). Largest in numbers were the AR15s. Penalties were severe and it was just registration, so many/most complied. A few years later, those rifles were outlawed. Sheriff’s deputies visited homes and picked them up.

            Following hurricane Katrina, the national guard went door to door and confiscated all firearms they could find. National guardsmen who refused were allowed to substitute other duties (to avoid conflict). The result was a playground for criminals.

            In both cases, am unaware of anyone standing their ground, using the “cold dead body” statement. People complied. Or they avoided the law. For example, I suspect that many California gun owners gave their “assault rifles” to relatives in other states to avoid the registration requirement. Some may have thoroughly hidden them.

            The police and/or military merely have to visit one house at a time with overwhelming force. Easy as can be. Absent an actual civil war, individuals will meekly comply.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Keep the Fake News Media in check.

Don’t let the MSM censor your news as America becomes Great Again. Over 500,000 Americans receive our daily dose of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness along with Breaking News direct to their inbox—and you can too. Sign up to receive news and views from The 1776Coalition!

We know how important your privacy is and your information is SAFE with us. We’ll never sell
your email address and you can unsubscribe at any time directly from your inbox.
View our full privacy policy.