By JOSH GERSTEIN | Politico
A three-judge panel assigned to hear South Carolina’s request to implement its new voter ID law revealed an unusual split Friday, dividing 2-1 on a preliminary ruling in the case.
The two judges in the majority, U.S. District Court Judges Colleen Kollar-Kotelly and John Bates, took a harder line against South Carolina’s efforts to invoke attorney-client privilege to shield material prepared by staff attorneys in the state Senate as the voter ID measure was being drafted.
The dissenter, D.C. Circuit Judge Brett Kavanaugh, would have allowed South Carolina to keep more of the information secret from the Justice Department and civil rights groups who have intervened in the case.
Lawyers following the case could not immediately point to another time in this election cycle that the the two-district-judge-and-one-appeals-court-judge panels that hear such disputes divided in a ruling.
“The baseline principle in this Circuit is…that a government attorney’s ‘advice on political, strategic, or policy issues [is] not . . . shielded from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege,'” Kollar-Kotelly and Bates wrote. “On the other hand, when a government attorney is not legislating but rather is providing legal advice, the attorney-client privilege does cover any confidential communications between the government client and attorney.”
To read more, visit: Â http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/
Don’t let the MSM censor your news as America becomes Great Again. Over 500,000 Americans receive our daily dose of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness along with Breaking News direct to their inbox—and you can too. Sign up to receive news and views from The 1776Coalition!
We know how important your privacy is and your information is SAFE with us. We’ll never sell
your email address and you can unsubscribe at any time directly from your inbox.