Mailers distributed to Wisconsin voters on Wednesday labeled Democrat-aligned Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate Susan Crawford as an “extreme abortion activist, not an impartial judge.” These mailers, part of a campaign by Women Speak Out PAC—a partner of Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America—aim to sway voters ahead of the April 1 election. The PAC, which has invested $1 million in the race, targets supporters of former President Donald Trump and pro-life voters, urging them to support Brad Schimel, a conservative former Wisconsin Attorney General.

The mailer emphasizes that Crawford has previously represented Planned Parenthood and has endorsements from pro-abortion groups such as Planned Parenthood and EMILY’s List. It warns voters against allowing Crawford to use her position to promote unrestricted abortion rights. This messaging campaign coincides with the start of early voting, which runs through March 30.

In addition to the mailers, Women Speak Out PAC has engaged in extensive grassroots efforts, including door-to-door canvassing by students, which began on March 6 and concluded recently with over 152,000 voter interactions. Kelsey Pritchard, Political Affairs Communications Director for SBA Pro-Life America, highlighted the significance of this election in the broader national context, particularly its implications for future abortion policies in Wisconsin.

The upcoming election is seen as a critical opportunity for conservatives to regain a majority in the Wisconsin Supreme Court following the 2023 election where liberal-leaning Janet Protasiewicz defeated conservative candidate Dan Kelly. This shift has heightened the stakes for both parties, with Democrats potentially using the court to influence legislative redistricting and affect the balance of power in the U.S. House of Representatives.

1776 Coalition Sponsored The Truth about Columbia University’s Moral Failure Columbia lost $400 Million in federal funding for good reason; they’ve been coddling up to America’s enemies. And the progressive left shouldn’t be so shocked because they’ve been helping to fund those antisemitic protests on college campuses. In fact, we have proof. Watch it here and then Stand with the Coalition for Jewish Values so we can rebuild America’s moral foundation.

Since the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision overturning Roe v. Wade, abortion has become a central issue in subsequent elections, including this one. Crawford has been vocal about her stance on abortion, referring to it as a matter of personal health care and autonomy, though she has not specified how she would rule on Wisconsin’s 1849 abortion law, which is currently on hold but expected to be addressed by the state’s high court later this year.

According to AdImpact Politics, a significant portion of Crawford’s campaign advertisements have focused on abortion, underscoring its importance in her campaign strategy. Pritchard, in her commentary for Breitbart News, criticized Crawford for her legal defense of abortion rights and her public support for Planned Parenthood.

The race is also being framed by Democrats as a chance to gain strategic advantages in future congressional elections. An email invitation for a briefing with Democrat donors and party leaders explicitly mentioned the potential to impact the allocation of U.S. House seats in upcoming elections.

Brad Schimel, in an interview with Breitbart News, accused Democrats of using the Supreme Court race as a means to secure political power and influence national politics. He emphasized the broader national implications of the race, suggesting it could affect President Trump’s legislative agenda and the Republican majority in the House.

A spokesperson for Crawford responded to inquiries by stating that she has not engaged in discussions about congressional redistricting and emphasized her commitment to impartiality and justice on the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

This election is anticipated to surpass previous spending records, reflecting its high stakes not only for Wisconsin but for the national political landscape. Wisconsin Supreme Court justices serve for ten-year terms, adding to the significance of each election.