Rand Paul is pitching libertarian ideas to social conservatives. And they’re listening.

by Chris Moody, Yahoo News
February 9, 2014

For many, the word that comes to mind when they hear the name Rand Paul is likely “libertarian.” While he gladly embraces the label, Paul brands himself as more a pragmatist than purist, and he’s seeking a way to bring libertarians and social conservatives—long warring cousins on the right—together.

If successful, Paul’s effort could be the start of a fresh form of fusionism on the right that could be a significant asset if he seeks the White House in 2016.

Instead of adopting a hard line on issues like drug legalization and non-interventionism like his father, former Texas Rep. Ron Paul, the younger Paul speaks about these topics in a way he hopes will spark collaboration instead of squabbling. And it seems to be working.

Paul’s efforts were on display Wednesday night at a gala for the American Principles Project, a conservative group that opposes abortion and same-sex marriage and aims to promote religious liberty. The group’s board includes Maggie Gallagher, one of the foremost advocates against same-sex marriage and Robert P. George, the chair of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom. APP is led by Francis P. Cannon, a conservative activist who authored a rebuttal report last year to calls within the Republican Party to de-emphasize social issues.

Speaking to a few hundred APP supporters at Washington, D.C.’s Mayflower hotel, Paul, knowing his audience, began by conceding that “libertarian,” is still “a bad word” to some. A few in the audience nodded.

“But libertarian, or liberty, doesn’t mean libertine,” Paul said. “To many of us, libertarian means freedom and liberty. But we also see freedom needs tradition.”

3 Comments - what are your thoughts?

  • Peter Locke says:

    Rand Paul …”is for open boarders”? Back that up; if you can.

  • Brer_Rabbit says:

    The Whig Party, in the early 1850s thought that compromise with the democratic slavery forces was ok. By 1860 they no longer existed and were pushed aside by the anti-slavery republicans. If Republicans decide to accept, and compromise on amnesty/legalization for illegal aliens, a little bit of abortion, illegal drug use, etc. they may find themselves on the same trash heap of history as the Whigs.

  • m Si says:

    Rand Paul is for open borders; not sure if he understands that you can’t have a country with 80 plus entitlement programs and let every worker on the planet to emigrate here; I think he’s for less government until his corporate cronies ask for an unending supply of cheap labor!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Keep the Fake News Media in check.

Don’t let the MSM censor your news as America becomes Great Again. Over 500,000 Americans receive our daily dose of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness along with Breaking News direct to their inbox—and you can too. Sign up to receive news and views from The 1776Coalition!

We know how important your privacy is and your information is SAFE with us. We’ll never sell
your email address and you can unsubscribe at any time directly from your inbox.
View our full privacy policy.