Trump will make an announcement on Arpaio at ‘appropriate’ time: White House

by MAX GREENWOOD
August 24, 2017

President Trump will make an announcement on whether he will pardon former Maricopa County, Ariz. Sheriff Joe Arpaio “at the appropriate time,” White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said Wednesday.

“I think that he’ll continue to make his plans clear when he’s ready and at the appropriate time, and we’ll certainly keep you guys posted on that,” she told reporters aboard Air Force One.

Trump himself appeared to hint at a rally in Phoenix, Ariz. Tuesday night that he was preparing to pardon the controversial former sheriff, who was convicted last month of criminal contempt.

“I won’t do it tonight because I don’t want to cause any controversy, all right?” Trump said. “But Sheriff Joe can feel good.”

16 Comments - what are your thoughts?

  • Bob says:

    So the Draft-Dodger didn’t have the guts to enter Military service years ago, and now he doesn’t have the balls to pardon Arpaio while he was in Arizona. It must be that yellow streak down his back. Drumpf will probably wait until he’s out of the Country when he pardons the convict.

    1. bobnstuff says:

      Now don’t be to hard on Donny, he just lost his puppet master and is having a hard time trying to think. Bannon would have told him what to do.

  • bobnstuff says:

    Say I’m a member of law enforcement and there is a court order that I break, what should happen to me. I just broke the law. It makes no difference whether I agree with the order, if I don’t I can appeal it, but until the appeal it’s the law. Would someone who believes in law and order break that ruling? Would some one who believes in the rule of law give me a pass. Our good ex sheriff broke the law and Trump is sending a message that it was OK to do it. I guess Trump doesn’t believe in laws.

    1. Bob says:

      ” Our good ex sheriff broke the law and Trump is sending a message that it was OK to do it. I guess Trump doesn’t believe in laws.” Using that “logic”, all the murderers, drug dealers and alike pardoned by previous Presidents show that they don’t believe in laws, either. I would think that pardoning a person for contempt of court is far less than pardoning people convicted of drug distribution, tax evasion, and fraud. Yes, he was a law enforcement and government official and is held to a higher standard than most, but he is also a citizen and eligible for this parole (unlike many who were pardoned in Jan 17).

      1. bobnstuff says:

        All those people Obama pardoned had spent time in jail for their crimes, a lot of time. In many cases more then others who did the same crime served. Not once did Obama hold up any of the people he pardoned as being great citizens. Our good Sheriff hasn’t spent day one in jail and most likely won’t. As sheriff he showed contempt for our justice system. I think there’s a difference here. Trump has shown his contempt for the courts over and over in the past so why would you think he beliefs have changed.

        1. Bob says:

          So you have no problem putting convicted drug dealers, many who also had gun charges, back on the street? You have no problem putting con artists back on the street after minimal sentences so that they can offend again? And what of Bradley Manning? He violated his oath of Enlistment and his security clearance. Yes he spent time in jail but should finish it rather than be a poster child for the PC crowd. Again, using your “logic”, President Obama cares little for our drug laws or the security of the US.
          Yes, the Sheriff broke the law by showing contempt to the judge. But I bet you would have no problem with the pardon had the judge ordered the arrest and deportation of illegals and the sheriff declined to, rather that the other way around. The Judge showed contempt for the FEDERAL LAW that the sheriff was trying to enforce, but that’s okay, right?
          To quote Hillary: “What does it matter?” If he spends a day in jail or not, he is will never work in law enforcement again. Doesn’t that just make you guys happy?

          1. bobnstuff says:

            You sure are all about justice, how about justice for all those people stopped for driving while Hispanic, I think our founding fathers had some problems with that kind of thing as has the SCOTUS over the years. Your boy was violating the rights of citizens. Then to make matters worse he violated a court order. The judge show no contempt for immigration laws, just how they were being enforced. And yes it makes me happy to know he will never work in law enforcement again although the voter had already decided that.

          2. Bob says:

            How about all those killed by gang bangers who have come to the country illegally? How about the immigrant Hispanic families terrorized by these same gangs? They force the sons and daughters of these folks to join or die. They shake down the families for money, or get their family members hooked on drugs. They rape CHILDREN, juvenile females, just for gang initiation. How about justice for them? Had these been Irish gang members who came to the country illegally, would you remain as dismissive?

          3. bobnstuff says:

            You seem to think that Gang Bangers are all illegals, there not. The gangs are there because the police aren’t. They are there because the immigrants can’t trust the police, and for good reason, there are police that will stop them for just being Hispanic. Do you know of any of those cops? As far as Irish gangs, there were no restrictions on immigration when they came over but there were still gangs. Go watch the movie “The Gangs of New York”. They were replaced by the Italian gangs, you remember them. We call them the Mob. Go watch “The God Father”. You also had your Puerto Rican gangs. “West Side Story”, We still have the black gangs and believe it or not white gangs. Ever heard of the Hell’s Angles.

          4. Bob says:

            Never said ALL gang bangers are illegals. I said that some do come in illegally. Deny that? You seem to label all Police as racial profilers. You actually believe this to be true? Or are you just repeating mantra of the left? I live in an area where MS-13 is rampant, and many (not all) ARE illegals. I have seen gangs take over neighborhoods. You say they are there because the Police aren’t. This may be true, but when the Police go in they get little to no cooperation from the residents, but do get a major attitude. And not just from the residents, but from “well meaning” outsiders, like you, who are there to find fault in everything the Police do. We had 2 adults have sex with a high school aged female, posting it on social media, and the press was incensed when the criminals were reported as being illegals. Life is NOT a movie. You can watch all you want, some are even fact based, but few are factual.

          5. bobnstuff says:

            I’m only labeling one Ex Sheriff a racial profiler and he was given that label by a judge so it’s not my opinion. If your neighborhood has been taken over it’s a number of peoples fault. The police didn’t build relationship with the community but instead road around in their cars and only showed up when there was a problem. How many police officers went in to help vs went in to arrest people. Respect for the police needs to be earned and trust goes both ways, Even the best officers can only do their job if they are trusted. When the local police start doing the job of ICE instead of serving and protecting the locals trust is lost.

            When the neighborhood started going down hill how many city council meetings did the local citizen attend and what neighbors went to complain before things got bad. The city can stop the decline but it’s up to the people that live there to put up a fight, after all it’s their neighborhood to defend.

            Immigrants don’t want to live in bad neighborhoods anymore then you or I do but they have no reason to trust the police unless the police create a bond with the people and the city needs to be willing to support that bond of trust. The sanctuary cities understand that they need the support of everyone both legal and illegal to keep people safe. It’s that bond of trust that counts.

            I have seen areas go bad and I have seen them turn around. No one person or group of people can do it by themselves but if all involved work together things can work out. What you don’t need is some cowboy coming in to make a name for himself at the expense of the trust of the people he is suppose to be protecting.

            I respect good officers and support their work. My nephew is a police officer and my local Chief of Police and I went to school together. I trust my local police force.

        2. Roy Fredrichsen says:

          bobnstuff – Sheriff Joe DID NOT get a trial by a jury of his peers as he requested. Everybody knows he was enforcing the existing immigration laws and a Democrat supporting judge really issued an unlawful order based on O’Bamas’ “pick and choose” which laws to enforce and denied a citizen a right according to the Constitution.

          1. bobnstuff says:

            Everyone knows he was conducting illegal harassment of American citizens. It wasn’t a Obama order her was violating but a court order. It was the Good Sheriff who broke the law and he should have paid the price but now our racist and chief has given him a pass. As far as our existing immigration laws, I’m sure you know nothing about them. Being in the country illegal is a
            misdemeanor, the same level of crime as a parking ticket. Our constitution give anyone in the country protection even the illegals. That has been established law for over a century. As far as selective enforcement, that has been a part of our system since day one and every time you get stopped and given a warning it’s that same principle.

  • Humble Servant says:

    Joe is a no nonsense type of American who loves his country and the people he served. The loony liberals were upset because he refused to bow to their wishes of evil and they wanted to make him pay. Joe is a solid honorable man and he knows Trump will take care of him in do time. He will wait and us his time to honor the people he has served. Thanks you Joe for your service…

  • Wingedgodd3ss says:

    I’m thinking Joe would feel good if he got pardoned already!

  • Genevarroldan says:

    Logic109j

    Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family!
    On tuesday I got a Smart new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    !ao139d:
    ➽➽
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobs429CashSportLogic/GetPay$97/Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!ao139l..,..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Keep the Fake News Media in check.

Don’t let the MSM censor your news as America becomes Great Again. Over 500,000 Americans receive our daily dose of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness along with Breaking News direct to their inbox—and you can too. Sign up to receive news and views from The 1776Coalition!

We know how important your privacy is and your information is SAFE with us. We’ll never sell
your email address and you can unsubscribe at any time directly from your inbox.
View our full privacy policy.