Bill would outlaw abortion for sex selection

May 30, 2012

By Cheryl Wetzstein-The Washington Times

Congress is set to wade into one of the most sensitive topics in the abortion debate, with a House vote Wednesday on a bill that would ban abortions that are performed solely because of an unborn child’s sex.

Pro-life advocates say sex-selection abortion amounts to a “war on baby girls,” and maintain that the practice – which is outlawed but still common in countries such as India and China – is on the rise in the United States.

“The real war on women occurs every day all over the world, even here in the United States,” said Susan Armacost, legislative director of the Wisconsin Right to Life.

Worldwide, more than 100 million girls are estimated to be “missing,” and a first-of-its kind study by University of Texas economics professorJason Abrevaya estimated that more than 2,000 girls were “missing” among Asian women who gave birth in California between 1991 and 2004.

But pro-choice advocates counter that the House’s Prenatal Nondiscrimination Act (PRENDA) is just another attempt to curb the right to an abortion, and doesn’t address the underlying cultural and economic behaviors that feed the so-called “son preference” in some cultures.

“We will not be used as a weapon in the war on women,” said Miriam Yeung, executive director of the National Asian Pacific American Women’s Forum. Sex-selection abortion bans haven’t worked elsewhere, she said, but South Korea saw its sex-ratio return to near-normal levels after the country changed property laws, expanded economic growth and launched a “Love Your Daughter” campaign.

The House bill would criminalize the “barbaric” practice of aborting a child solely because of its sex, and makes it illegal to coerce, fund or transport a pregnant woman to have such an abortion. Women who have such abortions would not face prosecution, and health-care providers would not be required to ask why a woman is having an abortion.

“This is an issue upon which all Americans should be able to find agreement, regardless of our party affiliations or even our beliefs about abortion,” said Rep. Trent Franks, Arizona Republican and lead sponsor of the bill.

PRENDA is being brought to the House floor Wednesday under a fast-track procedure known as a suspension of the rules, and thus would require a two-thirds majority to pass – a tall order for the current body, which is split 242 Republicans to 190 Democrats, with three vacancies.

The measure would face even longer odds in the Democrat-controlledSenate, where most give it no chance of passage.

The House vote follows the release of a video taken surreptitiously in April at a Texas Planned Parenthood clinic by anti-abortion activist Lila Rose’s Live Action group, which purportedly showed an employee of the organization counseling a woman contemplating a sex-selection abortion.

To read more, visit:

No comments yet - you can be the first!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Keep the Fake News Media in check.

Don’t let the MSM censor your news as America becomes Great Again. Over 500,000 Americans receive our daily dose of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness along with Breaking News direct to their inbox—and you can too. Sign up to receive news and views from The 1776Coalition!

We know how important your privacy is and your information is SAFE with us. We’ll never sell
your email address and you can unsubscribe at any time directly from your inbox.
View our full privacy policy.