ByÂ Shailagh Murray, The Washington Post
Yes, the same might be said of every Congress returning from every recess since lawmakers wore wigs and tights. But this time it could be a big problem, especially for the party in power.
WhenÂ Barack Obama took office and the Democrats took control of Washington, they made ambitious promises about how much they’d get done, with or without Republican help. Now, with relatively few working days left before the NovemberÂ midterm elections (in part because lawmakers granted themselves another long break beginning at the end of July), they might not be able to convince skeptical, frustrated voters that they delivered — and that they deserve to stay in charge.
Bills to extend unemployment benefits and impose new regulations on the financial industry have yet to be resolved. An emergency war funding bill, loaded up with unrelated spending, faces a White HouseÂ vetothreat. The Senate must still approveÂ Elena Kagan‘s nomination to the Supreme Court.
Add to that coming debates over campaign finance legislation, long-awaited food-safety rules and a contentious defense authorization bill that would end the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy on gays in the military.
As if that’s not enough, the Senate could add to the list. Sensing opportunity in the public’s outrage over the BP oil spill, Democrats are considering reviving the dormant climate-change debate.Â Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) is assembling legislation that would expand alternative energy incentives and overhaul offshore drilling standards, while requiring BP to assume full liability for damages in the Gulf of Mexico. If Reid decides to do it, the bill could reach the Senate floor as soon as July 19.
One way to tell whether a climate bill is more than an election-year compromise: if it seeks to impose significant restrictions on greenhouse gases, along the lines of the “cap and trade” system that was included in the House legislation passed in June 2009.
Those caps led to fears of rising energy bills among members of both parties, especially in the coal-dependent Midwest, and would do so again this year, resulting in a bitter fight just weeks before the elections. (Translation: Don’t bet on it.) Instead, Senate Democrats are weighing a diluted version that would apply only to power plants; aides said even that could be dropped, depending on the resistance it meets.
To read more, visit: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/11/AR2010071103548.html
Don’t let the MSM censor your news as America becomes Great Again. Over 500,000 Americans receive our daily dose of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness along with Breaking News direct to their inbox—and you can too. Sign up to receive news and views from The 1776Coalition!
We know how important your privacy is and your information is SAFE with us. We’ll never sell
your email address and you can unsubscribe at any time directly from your inbox.