CINCINNATI â€” In the first ruling by a federal appeals court onÂ President Barack Obamaâ€™s health care overhaul, a panel in Cincinnati handed the administration a victory Wednesday by agreeing that the government can require a minimum amount of insurance for Americans.
A Republican-appointed judge joined with a Democratic appointee for the 2-1 majority in another milestone forÂ Obamaâ€™s hotly debated signature domestic initiative â€” the first time a Republican federal court appointee has affirmed the merits of the law.
The White House and Justice Department hailed the panelâ€™s affirmation of an earlier ruling by a federal court in Michigan; opponents of the law said challenges will continue to the U.S. Supreme Court.
At issue is a conservative law centerâ€™s lawsuit arguing on behalf of plaintiffs that potentially requiring them to buy insurance or face penalties could subject them to financial hardship. The suit warns that the law is too broad and could lead to more federal mandates.
The Thomas More Law Center, based in Ann Arbor, Mich., argued before the panel that the law was unconstitutional and that Congress overstepped its powers.
The government countered that the measure was needed for the overall goal of reducing health care costs and reforms such as protecting people with pre-existing conditions. It said the coverage mandate will help keep the costs of changes from being shifted to households and providers.
White House adviser Stephanie Cutter called the ruling â€œanother victoryâ€ for millions of Americans and small businesses benefiting from the overhaul.
â€œAt the end of the day, we are confident the constitutionality of these landmark reforms will be upheld,â€ she said in a statement.
The law center predicted its case would have a good shot on appeal.
â€œClearly our case wonâ€™t resolve all the issues, because we donâ€™t raise the state rights issue, but we are the only one that is currently ripe for Supreme Court review that raises the challenge on behalf of an individual,â€ said David Yerushalmi, an attorney for the law center.
The three-judge 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel delivered a lengthy opinion with disagreement on some issues, moving unusually quickly in delivering its decision less than a month after hearing oral arguments.
â€œCongress had a rational basis for concluding that the minimum coverage provision is essential to the Affordable Care Actâ€™s larger reforms to the national markets in health care delivery and health insurance,â€ Judge Boyce F. Martin, appointed by former President Jimmy Carter, wrote for the majority.
A George W. Bush appointee concurred; a Ronald Reagan appointee who is a U.S. district judge in Columbus sitting on the panel disagreed. Judges are selected for panels through random draw.
Don’t let the MSM censor your news as America becomes Great Again. Over 500,000 Americans receive our daily dose of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness along with Breaking News direct to their inbox—and you can too. Sign up to receive news and views from The 1776Coalition!
We know how important your privacy is and your information is SAFE with us. We’ll never sell
your email address and you can unsubscribe at any time directly from your inbox.