ByÂ David Grant, Christian Science Monitor
Keeping interest rates on federal student loans from doubling as of this summer turned out to be more controversial than expected, as theÂ GOP-ledÂ House of RepresentativesÂ narrowly approved a measure Friday to extend the lower rate for another year.
All but 13Â DemocratsÂ voted against the measure, mainly because they don’t like how House Republicans came up with the money to pay for it. But 30 Republicans also put up “nay” votes, breaking with their leadership. In the end, the bill was approved 215 to 195. It holds interest rates on new federally subsidized Stafford loans at 3.4 percent come July 1, when they would otherwise rise to 6.8 percent.
â€œEvery penny counts when youâ€™re trying to start a career in a job market where even the most experienced workers canâ€™t find a job,â€ saidÂ Rep. Judy Biggert (R)Â ofÂ Illinois, the billâ€™s sponsor, in a statement. â€œAnd the tax-and-spend policies inWashingtonÂ havenâ€™t made it any easier. The last thing these students need is more debt, and my bill will prevent an unfair rate hike at the worst possible time.â€
A student loan bill has not yet come before the Senate, where Republicans have proposed a measure similar to that in the House. But Democrats control the Senate, and their proposal uses a different mechanism to pay for the low loan rate. They would eliminate a tax loophole that allows some individuals providing lucrative consulting or legal services to avoid payroll taxes. The Senate is slated to vote on the Democratic option during the second week of May.
The House student-loan legislation, on the other hand, picks up the $6 billion tab by raiding a part ofÂ President Obamaâ€™s health-care law that provides preventive and public health services. That stuck in many Democrats’ craw. It also created a dilemma for them: Vote against the low interest rate for student loans, or swallow the funding mechanism.
Just hours before the vote, theÂ White HouseÂ rode to their rescue, promising that President Obama would veto the House version because of the funding source.
â€œThis is one of the most cynical in a long string of cynical choices the Republicans have artificially put before us,â€ saysÂ Rep. Gerald Connolly (D)Â ofÂ Virginia. â€œThatâ€™s odious…. From the Democratic point of view, itâ€™s a false choice and weâ€™re not going to fall for that.â€
But the bill likewise ran afoul of some of the Houseâ€™s most conservative members, especially after two key conservative groups â€“ Heritage Action and theÂ Club for GrowthÂ â€“ urged lawmakers to vote against it for different reasons.
â€œThe federal government should not be in the business of distorting the market for student loans,â€ said Club for Growth PresidentÂ Chris Chocola, in a statement. â€œDecades of government intervention have driven tuition costs to record highs and continuing these subsidies is simply bad policy. We urge members of Congress to oppose them.â€
Don’t let the MSM censor your news as America becomes Great Again. Over 500,000 Americans receive our daily dose of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness along with Breaking News direct to their inbox—and you can too. Sign up to receive news and views from The 1776Coalition!
We know how important your privacy is and your information is SAFE with us. We’ll never sell
your email address and you can unsubscribe at any time directly from your inbox.