House GOP pushes back against short-term debt-ceiling increase

July 5, 2011

By Erik Wasson -The Hill

House Republicans are pushing back against suggestions, including from Senate GOP members, that a short-term debt ceiling increase might be acceptable.

The Treasury Department reiterated on Friday that it will not be able to pay all the nation’s bills after Aug. 2 without additional borrowing authority. The White House and Democrats want a debt-ceiling increase that lasts through 2012 and a package of deficit cuts to include hundreds of billion of dollars in tax increases.

With time running out and the GOP unbending on taxes, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) over the weekend suggested that a short-term “mini” deal could be necessary as a larger package of deficit reduction is negotiated over half a year. On Tuesday he said such a small deal, exchanging spending cuts for a short-term increase, is “more likely than not.”

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor’s (R-Va.) office said Tuesday that Cantor continues to oppose such an short-term deal.

Cantor “has said repeatedly that he doesn’t think a short-term deal could pass the House,” an aide said.

House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), speaking on the Laura Ingraham Show, also spoke negatively of the idea, arguing that it would take off the pressure for spending cuts.

“What they want to do is buy as much time as possible until the election with as little damage to big government as possible,” he said of the Democrats. “If they can just stall, win in 2012, they can keep us on this path … they just don’t want to take the medicine.”

Later in the program he said he was going to consult with Senate leadership on what the talk of a short-term deal means. In recent weeks Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Minority Whip Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) have floated the idea as well only to be told by House leaders that it cannot pass.

Twenty-six House members have already signed a pledge demanding a balanced-budget amendment be passed before the debt ceiling is increased. These conservative members have won a House vote in late July on the balanced-budget amendment, and some members worry that crafting a short-term deal will take away momentum from the vote.

Republican Study Committee head Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) is opposed to a short-term deal, as are many other RSC members, because he believes it will remove pressure for deep cuts and changes to the Constitution.

“This is unacceptable because it means an immediate debt-ceiling increase with spending cuts that may or may not come over 10 years. Congressman Jordan can only support a 7-month debt-ceiling increase if it includes immediate spending cuts, caps spending, and we send the balanced-budget amendment to the states as promised in the Cut, Cap, and Balance pledge,” Jordan spokesman Ben Miller said.

To read more, visit:

No comments yet - you can be the first!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Keep the Fake News Media in check.

Don’t let the MSM censor your news as America becomes Great Again. Over 500,000 Americans receive our daily dose of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness along with Breaking News direct to their inbox—and you can too. Sign up to receive news and views from The 1776Coalition!

We know how important your privacy is and your information is SAFE with us. We’ll never sell
your email address and you can unsubscribe at any time directly from your inbox.
View our full privacy policy.