David Hogg’s Bold Declaration on Democracy

David Hogg has made a startling declaration that sheds light on a broader sentiment within the Democratic Party. Hogg, known for his forthright manner, has essentially suggested that democratic principles should be sidelined if they do not align with leftist objectives. This isn’t a call for outright autocracy, but rather an endorsement of a system where democracy is only acceptable if it guarantees the desired outcomes by the left, reminiscent of regimes like those in Cuba or Venezuela where elections are merely a formality.

The Democratic Party’s Technocratic Tendencies

What Hogg’s statement reveals is a confirmation of what many have suspected: the Democratic Party has adopted a technocratic approach to governance. This approach prioritizes the appearance of democratic legitimacy while manipulating outcomes to fit their agenda. This was evident in the Democratic primary elections of 2016, 2020, and the upcoming 2024 election, where the selection process seemed heavily controlled and predetermined, sidelining the voice of ordinary voters and party members.

The 2020 Election and Beyond

The manipulation of democratic processes was starkly illustrated in a Time Magazine article by Molly Ball, titled “The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign” to save the 2020 election. The article outlined how the election was influenced by substantial financial investments and strategic changes to election laws, often bypassing legislative approval. This included extensive use of mail-in ballots and other tactics that were designed to ensure a loss for Trump, highlighting a disturbing manipulation of democratic processes.

Democratic Party’s Open Disdain for Democracy

The vice chair of the Democratic Party’s candid critique of democracy is unprecedented in its honesty. It reflects a growing sentiment among left-wing activists and intellectuals that America is fundamentally flawed and that power should be wrested from the voters to enforce better behavior. This perspective is not isolated but is indicative of a broader strategy within the Democratic Party to use bureaucratic mechanisms as a ‘check’ on the power of elected officials, further eroding the democratic process.

The Role of David Hogg in the Democratic Party

1776 Coalition Sponsored Ted Cruz Targeted, Who’s Next? When a Democrat Congresswoman jokes about assaulting a Senator, it’s clear: the radical Left is out of control. Help Senate Conservatives Fund fight back to defend our Constitution and way of life.

Despite potential dismissals of Hogg’s statements as those of a lone individual, his role as a primary public spokesperson for the Democratic Party suggests otherwise. Unlike Ken Martin, the head of the DNC, who remains largely behind the scenes, Hogg’s high profile and public visibility underscore his influence and the weight his viewpoints carry within the party. This alignment with the party’s tactics and ideologies cannot be overlooked.

In conclusion, Hogg’s admission, though not surprising, adds another layer to the understanding of the Democratic Party’s relationship with democracy. It is a clear indication of a divide that continues to grow between the party’s leadership and the general electorate, highlighting a fundamental shift in the party’s approach to governance and electoral integrity.