Controversial Colorado Bill Could Lead to Loss of Custody Over Gender Identity Issues

In Colorado, a new bill, House Bill 1312, is stirring significant controversy as it could lead parents to lose custody of their children based on the recognition of their child’s preferred gender identity. The bill, which has already passed the House with no debate allowed by the Democrats, is now awaiting approval in the Senate and a likely signature from Governor Jared Polis.

Details of House Bill 1312

House Bill 1312 has been presented under the guise of protecting transgender children from bullying. However, its implications are far-reaching, potentially stripping parents of their rights if they do not support their child’s desire to undergo gender transition procedures, such as puberty blockers, at a young age. The bill defines “coercive control” to include actions like deadnaming (using the child’s birth name after they have chosen a new name), misgendering, or threatening to reveal details about a child’s gender-affirming healthcare.

The bill mandates that courts consider these forms of coercive control when determining parental responsibilities, aligning with what is deemed in the best interest of the child. This essentially forces parents to adhere to gender ideology, prioritizing a child’s expressed gender identity over biological reality to maintain custody.

Political Manipulation and Opposition

The manner in which the bill was passed in the House—without debate and with immediate calls for a vote—highlights a disturbing trend of political manipulation. Democrats labeled opponents of the bill as members of a hate group, akin to the KKK, to dismiss and silence any opposition. This tactic reflects a broader strategy to equate dissenting views on gender ideology with extremism.

1776 Coalition Sponsored Predictor of Things to Come? Democrats are going to flood red districts with cash to flip them in 2026 like you saw them try in Tuesday’s election. Are you willing to live through more witch hunts? Are you willing to let President Trump get impeached again? We can’t be caught flat-footed again. Help us Protect American Values before you end up living in a socialist nation! Join the fight early!

Supporters of the bill, like state Rep. Lorena Garcia, argue that it is a step towards actualizing anti-discrimination protections for transgender individuals. However, critics see it as an extreme measure that infringes on parental rights and imposes a specific ideological stance on families.

The Broader Implications and Public Reaction

This bill is part of a growing trend in liberal states to enforce ideology over parental rights, often ignoring even judicial orders from other states in cases of custody disputes. Conversations with liberals often reveal a pattern of denial about these issues until overwhelming evidence forces acknowledgment, yet the acknowledgment comes with a rationalization that such measures are justified by ‘good intentions.’

The frustration lies in the lack of willingness to engage with reality and the blind trust in misleading or false narratives. As more people become aware of the implications of such laws, there is hope that even in states with strong liberal leanings, the public will begin to question and challenge these extreme policies.

The narrative that ‘good intentions’ excuse harmful outcomes is increasingly being questioned as more families experience the direct consequences of such legislation. The need for a balanced approach that respects both the rights of children to express their identity and the rights of parents to guide their upbringing without state interference is becoming ever more apparent.

As this bill moves closer to becoming law, it serves as a critical reminder of the ongoing cultural and political battles over gender identity and parental rights, highlighting the need for vigilant, informed engagement in these issues.