Highlights from the Wisconsin Supreme Court Debate

During a heated debate at Marquette University Law School, moderated by WISN 12, Wisconsin Supreme Court candidates Susan Crawford and Brad Schimel exchanged sharp criticisms and defended their records. The debate, crucial for determining the partisan balance of the court, saw both candidates, identified as liberal and conservative respectively, articulating their stances ahead of the April 1 election.

The Debate Intensifies

The atmosphere was charged from the start as both candidates did not hesitate to challenge each other. Crawford accused Schimel of merely paying lip service to impartiality, citing his previous comments on the state’s 1849 abortion law. Schimel countered by insisting his views were taken out of context, emphasizing the law’s historical legitimacy but questioning its current relevance to Wisconsin’s populace.

Elon Musk’s Influence Discussed

Elon Musk became a focal point during the debate, with Crawford highlighting his financial support for Schimel through his America PAC, which has contributed over $6 million. She criticized Musk’s involvement as an attempt to influence the judicial race, while Schimel defended his campaign’s independence from external groups.

Discussion on Voter ID Laws

Both candidates also touched on the upcoming ballot measure that seeks to embed voter photo ID requirements into the state Constitution. Schimel voiced his support for the measure, stressing the importance of voter integrity. Conversely, Crawford refrained from stating her voting preference on the measure, citing the inappropriateness of judicial influence on voter decisions.

Controversy Over Fundraiser Appearance

1776 Coalition Sponsored George Soros’ Goons came to my District George Soros sent his goons into my district to hold a fake townhall meeting. This is Rep. Jack Bergman. They didn’t invite me, but they used an empty chair as a prop while they attacked my support for DOGE and America First policies. If you’re tired of Soros-funded leftists attempting to sabotage America’s future, then please help me keep up the fight in Congress.

Crawford addressed concerns about her participation in a donor advisory briefing, which was criticized for potentially implying bias in future congressional redistricting cases. She clarified her limited involvement in the call, which was intended to share her background and reasons for running, and disassociated herself from the controversial email sent prior to the event.

Schimel Distances Himself from Trump

In an effort to establish his judicial independence, Schimel emphasized his commitment to applying the law impartially, distancing himself from President Trump despite previous endorsements. He assured that his allegiance would be to the law and not to any individual, including the President.