Elon Musk’s Bold Move in Wisconsin Supreme Court Election

In a dramatic gesture, Elon Musk distributed $1 million checks to two voters in Wisconsin, positioning them as representatives for his political organization. This occurred during a pivotal event in Green Bay, where Musk emphasized the significance of the upcoming Wisconsin Supreme Court election. He linked the outcome directly to President Donald Trump’s agenda and described it as crucial for “the future of civilization.”

Addressing a crowd of approximately 2,000, Musk, donning a distinctive yellow cheesehead hat, expressed his commitment by stating, “I’m not phoning it in. I’m here in person.” His involvement includes a substantial financial backing exceeding $20 million to support conservative candidate Brad Schimel. This election is set to determine the court’s ideological balance, which is expected to influence major state and national issues.

Musk’s Influence and Legal Challenges

The involvement of Musk has stirred controversy, particularly among supporters of Susan Crawford, the liberal candidate. They argue against the influence Musk seeks to exert over the judiciary. Despite these objections, Musk defended his actions by highlighting potential risks, such as redistricting that could impact Republican representation in Congress.

A legal attempt to halt Musk’s financial giveaways was rejected by the Wisconsin Supreme Court, which currently holds a liberal majority. The court declined to hear the case, with no explanation provided, allowing Musk to proceed with his plan just before his rally. Lower courts had previously dismissed the challenge brought forward by Democrat Josh Kaul, who cited violations of state law against inducements for voting.

1776 Coalition Sponsored Don’t let Senate Republicans kill the Trump Agenda Why do Senate Republicans make the rest of the GOP worry every time Congress has a fight over major legislation? They rarely seem to remember that they were elected to protect individual rights, cut spending and limit government overreach. Fortunately, we have our Top Defenders of Liberty leading the way, like: Rand Paul, Mike Lee, and Ron Johnson. Unfortunately, there’s still many others in the U.S. Senate who earned a low score in our Liberty Index, and they need to hear from you. Will you join our efforts to ensure the U.S. Senate passes Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” without compromises or interference from Senate RINOS?

Musk’s legal team countered by asserting his First Amendment rights, arguing that the payments were meant to foster a grassroots movement against activist judges rather than to directly influence the election outcome.

Strategic Legal Maneuvers and Judicial Endorsements

In a strategic legal move, Musk’s attorneys requested the recusal of two liberal justices involved in campaigning for Crawford, citing potential bias. However, both justices declined the request, promising to explain their decision later. This issue highlights the intense judicial partisanship surrounding the election, where even one conservative justice openly endorsed Schimel.

Brad Schimel, echoing the sentiments of restraint and legality, stated in a television interview that he is committed to rejecting activist judges and adhering strictly to the law, aligning himself with the expectations of Trump, Musk, and his supporters.

Implications of the Election

The election has set new records for judicial campaign spending, with totals soaring over $81 million. The Wisconsin Supreme Court’s forthcoming decisions will likely affect critical issues such as abortion rights, congressional redistricting, union power, and voting regulations. These rulings will have profound implications for the 2026 midterms and the 2028 presidential race, underscoring the national significance of this high-stakes judicial contest.